![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
My guess is the Red Sox will spend a big chunk of their newfound PayFlex on Ellsbury and that they suffer severe buyer's remorse at some point in the not-too-distant future. Ellsbury has never been able to sustain success in his career. I wouldn't want to be the team that paid him for a lot of years or that moved a lot of talent to get him.
If he's on the market, I'd let teams fight over him and Josh Hamilton and go after other options.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,406
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
Quote:
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
The Red Sox?
I'm not sure. It would take huge rebounds from Lester and Buchholz. Add in a step forward for Doubront and a new SP from somewhere else. Then remake the bullpen (possibly with Daniel Bard making a return and Andrew Bailey bouncing back). Then sort out the lineup with Ellsbury coming back strong, a new 1B, a new SS and at least one new OF corner. If all of that happens that team could contend. The upside for Boston is it has cash. It can buy a lot of talent on the open market, though we saw with the Marlins this year that spending does not equate to winning. If the core is rotten then it doesn't matter what they add. And if they don't add the right pieces then it doesn't matter if the core rebounds. Basically, a lot can go wrong with the Sox.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
Yeah, they seem to be still in toppling mode. I'm not sure if I'd rather be the Cubs or Red Sox right now. At least the Cubs are a year ahead in the rebuilding process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,406
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
Quote:
Theo > Cherington and I'm not a big Theo fan. A year ahead in the rebuilding process. Some key pieces locked up for the long term. (Castro, Rizzo, Smardzjia) Less spoiled fan base. Nowhere to go but up. By comparison, the Sox basically have had nowhere to go but down.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Ex-tixe
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Just past Mars
Posts: 4,466
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
I hate to say it, but the Cubs have more of an idea what they're doing now. I wouldn't be surprised if they have a legitimate shot at a World Series in the next decade.
As for Ellsbury, I don't know what direction the Reds will go, but I'm betting they add some offense somewhere. In truth, they need to add a consistent hitter to the lineup as much as they need a leadoff guy. This team's entered new territory now. Look for them to start (or continue) making moves like a contender.
__________________
At the Edge of the Woods Preview Go to the edge of the cliff and jump off. Build your wings on the way down. --Ray Bradbury |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
The Ellsbury injuries, Scott Boros, the Sox having a center fielder (Jackie Bradley) as a top prospect, the Carl Crawford experience, and the need for pitching create a dilemma for Ben Cherington and the Reds Sox.
The Sox don't need one year of Ellsbury. They are unlikely to rebuild and recover enough to contend in the AL East next season. They don't need to gamble a big long term contract on a player who has a history of injuries. Crawford, Lackey, and Matsuzaka should show them that. They have Jackie Bradley coming and need to get something for Ellsbury...but they probably won't due to injuries and Boras. Unless Cherington totally drops the ball and offers Ellsbury at pennies on the dollar, the Reds should probably stay clear of the Ellsbury uncertainty.
__________________
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."- Noam Chomsky Last edited by Spitball; 10-25-2012 at 10:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,491
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
Also, I would not be surprised to see the Red Sox hold onto Ellsbury until the trade deadline. Right now his trade value is down, and the Sox will want to show their fans they intend to be competitive.
__________________
"Colorless green ideas sleep furiously."- Noam Chomsky |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,328
|
Re: Jacoby Ellsbury
This, I really think they're more likely to try to trade for other teams' 1 year left of fairly expensive contract types, unless they get an offer that's too good to pass up. The last thing they want to do is sign free agents to huge long term contracts, but there's a big gulf between their current payroll obligations and their expected budget.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |