![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
What Me Worry?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,416
|
Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
http://cincinnati.reds.mlb.com/news/...s_cin&c_id=cin
I didn't see where this was posted anywhere on here yet, but IMO, and with out question, this has to be this FO's #1 priority in the off-season. Regardless of the fact we won 97 games..... Quote:
We're all excited and dreaming of Billy Hamilton. But the earliest we'll see him is the 2014 season. He's not only learning a new position (CF), but he also has to be allowed to progress through the system and show he can hit, consistently get on base, at this level. So he's not going to be rushed. So what does this FO do in the meantime? Bourn would be nice. Two words though.... Scott Boras. He will be a coveted prize this off-season by a lot of teams. Boras is licking his chops, and IMO, no way you'll see him a Red. The Giant's Pagan, who will be a FA after the WS, would be nice. My guess is he'll stay a Giant because they will throw the money at him. So what's left? I realize that anything, when looking at who may be available in the market, is better then what we had. So do we settle for that, treat it as a stop-gap move, while keeping our fingers crossed on Hamilton? I really want no part of Coco Crisp. Not at $7M/yr, and a career .329 OB%. I guess if I had to choose anyone from this article it would be Juan Pierre... he will rack up the singles and walks, batted .307 with a .351 OBP and 37 steals for the Phillies this past season, and earned $800,000 doing it. He's in our price range. It's just sad what has happened to Grady Sizemore. Always liked him, but the guy has been wrecked with injuries (back, knees).
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,682
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
I'd just keep BP there for the whole season.
Reds need a big bat, not another little one.
__________________
"But I do know Joey's sister indirectly (or foster sister) and I have heard stories of Joey being into shopping, designer wear, fancy coffees, and pedicures." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,919
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
If I had to bet on one guy the Reds pick up, I think it's Denard Span (for young pitching).
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 388
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
They should bat Votto at lead-off. Phillips has been a better hitter in the 3rd or 4th spot than leading off for the past several seasons. Votto is an on-base machine and hitting doubles the way he does from the lead-off spot would put a runner in scoring position immediately.
Let Cozart bat 2nd (he hit 100 points higher from that spot than from leadoff) then follow with Bruce, Phillips, Frazier, LF, CF (whomever that is), Hannigan/Mes, pitcher. Another advantage of moving Votto up is that the Reds wouldn't be at a disadvantage negotiating a trade or signing a FA since what they need (a left handed outfielder with high OBP) wouldn't be as specific.
__________________
If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,430
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
Quote:
But if we get the Joey we all know and love -- the one with the 1.000+ OPS, the doubles machine who hits 30 HR by accident with his "process swing" -- then I think leadoff is a mistake. He's the guy you want hitting with other people on the basepaths; that's how you maximize the value of his XBH.
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,431
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,393
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
Quote:
But, if the Reds are insistent on getting a leadoff hitter, then trading for Shin Soo Choo is my number 1 target and plop him down in left.
__________________
Last edited by _Sir_Charles_; 10-26-2012 at 10:07 AM. Reason: meant left handed. Although a switch hitter would be great. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,682
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
I think we can all agree that as long as Dusty is managing the team, Brandon is going to hit in one of the top four spots in the lineup.
Career numbers in those spots 1 265/325/426 751 2 279/322/427 749 3 277/323/428 750 4 282/331/454 785 IMO 750 and 785 are not acceptable numbers for the 3rd and 4th spots That leaves leadoff or second. I'd keep him at leadoff.
__________________
"But I do know Joey's sister indirectly (or foster sister) and I have heard stories of Joey being into shopping, designer wear, fancy coffees, and pedicures." |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,318
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,427
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
Quote:
1. Justin Upton 2. Dexter Fowler 3. Jacoby Ellsbury 4. Shin Soo-Choo 5. Re-sign Ryan Ludwick to a 2 year deal and get a one year stop-gap in CF.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,636
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
If the Reds get Denard Span this off-season, I will be very happy. Then, I will wonder, if the Reds liked him, why didn't we get him at the trade deadline. I really think Denard Span could have been the difference between an NLDS heartbreaker and something more in the post-season.
Span just makes so much sense for a team like the Reds. Let's hope Walt gets it done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
The Reds need OB. If it comes attached to power great. If it comes attached to speed, that's fine too. And Phillips' main offensive value is putting the ball in play with runners on base. He's a better #2 hitter than a #1 hitter.
Plus, it's time the Reds gave Dusty what he wants. He wants a CF who can hit leadoff. Stubbs can't do it, at least not vs. RHPs. Time to get someone who can.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,427
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
Quote:
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,727
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
It seems simple.... until we see how little money they will likely have.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,427
|
Re: Adding productive leadoff man is Reds' top priority
I'm not entirely convinced that will be the case. They are preparing for a much bigger windfall than has previously been reported.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |