RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-29-2012, 07:26 PM   #46
Slyder
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,062
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
Notre Dame being in the NC game would be good for business. Don't under estimate that.
Last time Notre Dame was in a BcS game the result was the media creation of a national nightmare for this Raider fan. Them making the national championship while good ratings to start I'm sure will end up in a farce that will keep the most diehard Domers and haters out there. I like last years national title joke of a game will not watch.

As a WVU fan I hope KSU gets a chance to avenge the crap of last year (2 ACC teams I mean seriously they are BY FAR the WORST conference in BcS) but as a fan I want to see Oregon vs Alabama. The most prolific offense vs the most prolific defense in what should have been the storyline last year (LSU vs OK St). All this IMO.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by moewan View Post
Barmaid to patron "Sir you are slurring, I am going to have to cut you off"

Patron to barmaid "I'm not slurring, I'm speaking in cursive"


Last edited by Slyder; 10-29-2012 at 08:21 PM.
Slyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 10-29-2012, 07:41 PM   #47
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,936
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
Notre Dame being in the NC game would be good for business. Don't under estimate that.
No one that has any say in the algorithm has any vested interest in this "business" you speak of. Voters don't care about it being good for "business" nor do the computers that have algorithms that rank teams. TV networks and universities certainly have a business interest, but they don't have any say in the algorithm. This business isn't going to get them more votes nor is it going to artificially inflate their strength of schedule when playing Pittsburgh, Boston College or Wake Forest. The whole "Notre Dame draws ratings" card is a fictional narrative as far as the BCS formula is concerned.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda

Last edited by Brutus; 10-29-2012 at 07:47 PM.
Brutus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 07:44 PM   #48
Brutus
Et tu, Brutus?
 
Brutus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, Ga.
Posts: 8,936
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by fearofpopvol1 View Post
It certainly will depend on how close the scores are of each game. Notre Dame has a very good shot of playing in the national title game if they win out.
I'll ask you for the fourth time, what technical reason do you have for thinking that? I am getting the impression, no offense, that you don't understand how the system is structured. I keep asking why you think Notre Dame's score would be higher than Oregon's and you haven't answered that question.

The scores have nothing to do with it, by the way. Margin of victory is not a component in this system and voters are certainly not going to reward Notre Dame because they blew out three of the worst teams in college football. If they wanted to bump Notre Dame, they would have done it this week after beating Oklahoma.
__________________
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
Brutus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 10:11 PM   #49
fearofpopvol1
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 8,634
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutus View Post
I'll ask you for the fourth time, what technical reason do you have for thinking that? I am getting the impression, no offense, that you don't understand how the system is structured. I keep asking why you think Notre Dame's score would be higher than Oregon's and you haven't answered that question.

The scores have nothing to do with it, by the way. Margin of victory is not a component in this system and voters are certainly not going to reward Notre Dame because they blew out three of the worst teams in college football. If they wanted to bump Notre Dame, they would have done it this week after beating Oklahoma.
The scores very well may matter. If Notre Dame has good showings, that may be the difference. Maybe it won't be. You obviously disagree. It's my prediction and I'm sticking to it. We'll see if I'm right soon enough.
fearofpopvol1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2012, 11:22 PM   #50
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Notre Dame being good for business will not affect the computers, I agree. But for those who feed at the trough of college football for a living, Notre Dame in the title game is quite appetizing. If there are 3 undefeated teams at seasons end, I'd bet the propaganda machine would be out in full to get voters to rank the Irish second.

I'm not complaining about that, it is just what I anticipate happening.
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 11:01 PM   #51
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Well that discussion is all moot now.

KSU totally exposed.
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 11:11 PM   #52
Boston Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

I hate Pitt's kicker.
Boston Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 11:23 PM   #53
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Oregon - Stanford headed to OT due to Chip Kelly refusing to kick a chip shot FG on 4th down.

Live by the sword.....
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 11:36 PM   #54
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
Oregon - Stanford headed to OT due to Chip Kelly refusing to kick a chip shot FG on 4th down.

Live by the sword.....
Die by the sword.

Congrats on the #1 ranking Irish.
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 11:37 PM   #55
Revering4Blue
All Fired Up
 
Revering4Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,423
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Down goes Oregon.

At this rate, we're looking at an ND/Alabama NC game.

ZZZZZZZ.
__________________
Quote:
I have just been more than a little suspect of all the trades since the Willy (Scott Williamson) cash grab. That one left such a bad taste in my mouth that even a 1985 Dom Pérignon couldn't cleanse it.--Creek14
Revering4Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 11:39 PM   #56
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revering4Blue View Post
Down goes Oregon.

At this rate, we're looking at an ND/Alabama NC game.

ZZZZZZZ.
Not gonna be easy next week in LA.
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 11:50 PM   #57
Revering4Blue
All Fired Up
 
Revering4Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,423
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
Not gonna be easy next week in LA.
True, even though USC is due for a signature win, I'll believe a USC win over Notre Dame if and when I see it. The USC defense is a mess.
__________________
Quote:
I have just been more than a little suspect of all the trades since the Willy (Scott Williamson) cash grab. That one left such a bad taste in my mouth that even a 1985 Dom Pérignon couldn't cleanse it.--Creek14
Revering4Blue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2012, 11:52 PM   #58
Boston Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

USC's best win of the year so far is over Syracuse. I doubt that changes next week.
Boston Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 12:22 AM   #59
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,330
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boston Red View Post
USC's best win of the year so far is over Syracuse. I doubt that changes next week.
Your first sentence is true, but that is not how one projects things going forward.

USC has lost to Stanford, UCLA, and Oregon...all top 20 teams...by an average of of 9.3 points. That suggests they will at least keep it close.

Notre Dame has won 5 games by a touchdown or less. The only other team out there who has done the same is OSU as far as I can see. Both teams have been fortunate. See Purdue and Pitt.

My only contention is that it will not be an easy game for ND.
kaldaniels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 12:32 AM   #60
Boston Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
Re: 2011 Notre Dame Football Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaldaniels View Post
Your first sentence is true, but that is not how one projects things going forward.
It's certainly a factor in predicting the future that every decent team USC has played has beaten them. Close or not.
Boston Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25