![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,826
|
Re: Cubs sign Navarro
Not a surprise. I thought Navarro would get major league contract with someone. He's too good a hitter and a viable backup catcher not to be signed by someone. I was surprised the Reds had gotten him on a minor league contract last season. It's time now for Mez to step up and be the catcher we think he can be. I don't think anymore time in the minors would help him that much. More playing time at the big league level will do that. I hope they flip him and Hanigan next year. Mez 3 days or more and Hanigan no more than two days a week. Time to find out if he can handle the bigs or not.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971 |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,631
|
Re: Cubs sign Navarro
Quote:
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,671
|
Re: Cubs sign Navarro
Quote:
BTW, Ryan Hannigan is in the last year of a 3-year contract where he's averaged $1.33M per season. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,631
|
Re: Cubs sign Navarro
Not really, in comparative dollars. He has to barely play above replacement level to hit the breakeven on such a small contract. Perhaps its a big deal to you, but I'm not sure why.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,671
|
Re: Cubs sign Navarro
Quote:
Navaro is no better today than he was at the start of last year. Yet he got a major league contract and guaranteed $1.75M. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,631
|
Re: Cubs sign Navarro
Quote:
The Cubs are a bad team, they have to overpay even for potential slightly above replacement level players or they can continue to run out the same garbage for league minimum. They are trying to upgrade from Clevenger's OPS+ of 48 and Castillo, do you really think that he shouldn't be replaced? For some reason, someone with the Cubs must see something that made him a target for their plans. In the current economy of MLB, I simply think you are extremely overstating the value of that contract.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em Last edited by traderumor; 11-17-2012 at 10:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,819
|
Re: Cubs sign Navarro
Navarro struck me as a solid hitter, good enough to be on most teams' bench. I didn't get the impression that he was a particularly good defender or thrower.
I think the important take away here is that the Reds are not discouraged with Mes and expect him to be on the roster. They will likely pick up a veteran for AAA and possible major league fill in duty. The Reds should and will give Mes more playing time next year. Hanigan is a terrific defender and gets on base well, but has very little power and has a limited offensive game. IMO the Reds should go for it with Mes next year. Of course it is November so I reserve the right to change my view if Mes slumps early. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |