RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-18-2012, 01:14 AM   #376
Slyder
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,061
Re: College Football Realignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reds Freak View Post
Hadn't thought of that. Would have been nice if Kevin Plank could have stepped in when eight sports were getting cut last year. Football is king obviously in Div. I. I wonder how much, if any, consideration is given to these programs non-revenue sports teams when making these conference decisions.
Of course there probably is some. If Maryland starts receiving more money by the move to the Big 10 then they have more to budget and probably renew some of those lost programs. I know WVU restarted a couple non revenue teams with the move to the big 12.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by moewan View Post
Barmaid to patron "Sir you are slurring, I am going to have to cut you off"

Patron to barmaid "I'm not slurring, I'm speaking in cursive"

Slyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 11-18-2012, 11:52 AM   #377
Reds Freak
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,092
Re: College Football Realignment

I'd like to see the NCAA take control of college football realignment. Let schools choose whatever conference they want for their other sports. For football, create four conferences of 32 schools based on geography. Break down each conference into four divisions of eight schools. Schools would play each team in their division once for a total of seven division games and four non-conference games. The four winners of each division would play in a Final Four for their conference title. The four conference winners would play a Final Four for the national title.

This allows every team in the country an equal opportunity to play for a national title. It keeps travel costs down and increases attendance for all sports by breaking the schools up geographically. I would imagine the television money for a system like this would be astronomical. The schools that don't make the playoffs can play in bowl games. It keeps traditional rivalries alive by allowing schools to keep their conference ties with all other sports and allowing them to schedule out-of-conference games against traditional rivals without worrying that one non-conference loss will do them in.
__________________
"In our sundown perambulations of late, through the outer parts of Brooklyn, we have observed several parties of youngsters playing 'base', a certain game of ball. Let us go forth awhile, and get better air in our lungs. Let us leave our close rooms, the game of ball is glorious"
-Walt Whitman
Reds Freak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 01:06 PM   #378
IslandRed
Charlie Brown All-Star
 
IslandRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mt. Juliet, TN
Posts: 4,675
Re: College Football Realignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Revering4Blue View Post
My guess is that the Big Ten Network has their eyes on the D.C TV market (Maryland) and the N.Y/N.J market (Rutgers).

However, College Football is an afterthought in both markets.
Yeah. I get that, but I have to agree with what Dan Wetzel wrote, if it's primarily about BTN money then the league is starting to let the tail wag the dog.

It's also interesting that Maryland was one of the two ACC schools who voted against raising the conference exit fee recently. (Florida State was the other, unsurprisingly.)
__________________
"I don't have a baseball team, I have a theological seminary." -- Charlie Brown
IslandRed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 03:36 PM   #379
Mutaman
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,886
Re: College Football Realignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyder View Post
Rutgers draws well, a couple of ESPNs highest rated games were involving Rutgers a couple years ago when they were potentially playing for Big East crown. Rutgers has always been that "what if" case.
I suspect those Rutgers games were out-rated by an old edition of Yankeeography on the Yes network. The only college football folks in NYC watch is Notre Dame. Turn on WFAN on a Friday afternoon in November and the #2 topic is the NFL. #1, as always , are the Yankees and the Mets. College football- nobody cares. Rutgers- get serious.
Mutaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 07:56 PM   #380
paintmered
SERP Emeritus
 
paintmered's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
Re: College Football Realignment

Looks like we're approaching the endgame for realignment. I just hope my Bearcats aren't relegated to the MAC by the time the dust settles.

ESPN is pulling the strings again.
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question?

All models are wrong. Some of them are useful.

Last edited by paintmered; 11-18-2012 at 08:02 PM.
paintmered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 09:08 PM   #381
Mutaman
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,886
Re: College Football Realignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by paintmered View Post
Looks like we're approaching the endgame for realignment. I just hope my Bearcats aren't relegated to the MAC by the time the dust settles.

ESPN is pulling the strings again.
Marquette will play em. If you insist on a football game too, we'll send UW-Whitewater.
Mutaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2012, 09:25 PM   #382
Hoosier Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,853
Re: College Football Realignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyder View Post
Rutgers draws well, a couple of ESPNs highest rated games were involving Rutgers a couple years ago when they were potentially playing for Big East crown. Rutgers has always been that "what if" case.

I think its a great fit Maryland and Big 10. And a great financial winfall for an university that greatly needs it. I always thought it might happen, I am surprised though Rutgers would be #2, I always thought UVa or Ga Tech made a lot of sense.

Edit:
In a population center like the NY metro area you don't have to draw a huge number to get a lot of tvs. Rutgers does draw enough to move the needle if by default.
Great points. Plus if the Big Ten Network gets even a sniff of the cable fees it currently brings in from the current markets, that's an absolute bucketful of money.

New York, Washington DC and Baltimore, heck at 10 cents per subscriber, that's a boatload. And that's before you get 1 person to tune in.

I'd love UVa. I think they'd be an excellent fit. Ga Tech doesn't really fit in with the other schools. It would be the smallest school outside of Northwestern, and it competes in a crowded market where it barely gets interest.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life.
---Joe Posnanski
Hoosier Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 12:23 AM   #383
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
Re: College Football Realignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by paintmered View Post
Looks like we're approaching the endgame for realignment. I just hope my Bearcats aren't relegated to the MAC by the time the dust settles.

ESPN is pulling the strings again.
It's getting harder to see a scenario where this story has a happy ending for UC fans. I think the silence surrounding them in every one of these expansion stories is getting a tad deafening.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 12:13 PM   #384
Reds Fanatic
Member
 
Reds Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Piqua, OH
Posts: 16,437
Re: College Football Realignment

Maryland is officially moving to the Big Ten starting in the 2014-2015 academic year. Rutgers will announce their move to the Big Ten tomorrow.
Reds Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 12:17 PM   #385
Boston Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
Re: College Football Realignment

Silly season.

And UC is likely screwed.
Boston Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 01:00 PM   #386
LoganBuck
I hate the Cubs
 
LoganBuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,580
Re: College Football Realignment

I don't think they are done at 14. I think you will see the BigTen make a play for 16. I think they will take two more ACC schools. My guess is that they are after two of UNC, Florida St, and Virginia. There has been some rumbling about Georgia Tech, too.

Rutgers and Maryland don't do anything other than grab the money they will need to buy the exit fees for bigger fish.
__________________
Whenever you get mad over a called strike or ball on a close pitch, it's the equivalent of being mad at the QB pump-faking one time before throwing a pass in your average NFL game. ---Caveat Emperor
LoganBuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 02:01 PM   #387
Slyder
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,061
Re: College Football Realignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoganBuck View Post
I don't think they are done at 14. I think you will see the BigTen make a play for 16. I think they will take two more ACC schools. My guess is that they are after two of UNC, Florida St, and Virginia. There has been some rumbling about Georgia Tech, too.

Rutgers and Maryland don't do anything other than grab the money they will need to buy the exit fees for bigger fish.
In this order IMO:
UNC
Virginia
Ga tech
Miami is the consolation prize.

Big 12 if forced keys in on:
Fla St
Clemson
Ga Tech/ Va Tech
Louisville
NC State

SEC is who I want to see and may dictate to the rest.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by moewan View Post
Barmaid to patron "Sir you are slurring, I am going to have to cut you off"

Patron to barmaid "I'm not slurring, I'm speaking in cursive"

Slyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 02:03 PM   #388
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
Re: College Football Realignment

I dont think sec has an appetite to expand further anytime soon.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 02:14 PM   #389
Caveat Emperor
Titanic Struggles
 
Caveat Emperor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
Re: College Football Realignment

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMR View Post
I dont think sec has an appetite to expand further anytime soon.
Nor do they have any financial inventive to. Their TV deal (along with the B12's TV deal) doesn't expand if they add new teams -- it merely increases the number of mouths that need to be fed and shrinks the revenue pool for existing schools.
__________________
Championships Matter.
22 Years and Counting...
Caveat Emperor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-19-2012, 02:31 PM   #390
RiverRat13
Free Aroldis!
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 631
Re: College Football Realignment

Has anyone else read any rumors that Fox, which owns a stake in the B1G Network and is about to acquire a stake in the YES Network, is going to bundle both YES and B1G together for NY/NJ cable networks and basically say if you want to carry YES on your basic tier you'll also need to carry the B1G on your basic tier? If that is pulled off, $$$$$ for the B1G.
RiverRat13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25