![]() |
|
|
#571 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 362
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Briles would be a fool not get out of Baylor while his name is hot and cash in, whether that's Arkansas, Tennessee, Auburn, or Kentucky. He would be able to bring Texas recruits with him.
__________________
http://diamondvisits.blogspot.com/ My Minor League stadium review site. |
|
|
|
|
|
#572 |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,567
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Bill O'Brien and Butch Jones are probably two "get out of dodge" fast candidates too...
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
#573 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
I don't see why Jones would be in that category. There's no reason he can't keep winning at UC and wait for the right opportunity to come along. It's more obvous to me why Briles and O'Brien would want to leave now (though O'Brien basically has a four-year hallpass after this year and given the sanctions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#574 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,567
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Quote:
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#575 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Well, maybe they're desireable to him, and maybe they're not. Who knows? Kentucky is not desireable. Arkansas may be undesireable to some people. Auburn is generally an excellent job, but who knows what that's going to look like if the NCAA really is moving in. And it sounds like the whole athletic department down there is a mess. Could be a bad situation. Tennessee is generally desireable, and the expectations might even be manageable there for now given how bad they've been. I'm not sure Purdue is a particularly good job. NC State might be a good job, but your potential boss (Debbie Yow) is apparently an idiot.
So maybe Jones is interested in one of those jobs, and maybe he's not. In the meantime, if he's a good coach, he'll keep winning until something he wants is available. It's not like Briles who might lose a bunch of games at Baylor even if he's doing a good job just because the competition is so severe. |
|
|
|
|
|
#576 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Jones turned down jobs with better situations after last season than UK and Purdue. If he goes, I'd expect it to be for something higher profile.
By the way, my Purdue colleagues were convinced they were getting Brian Kelly three years ago. Kelly had already turned down UCLA and Tennessee by that point, and he's going to go to Purdue? Really?
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#577 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 362
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Current Coaching Job Vacancies:
Auburn Out: Gene Chizik In: Arkansas Out: John L. Smith In: California Out: Jeff Tedford In: Colorado Out: John Embree In: Boston College Out: Frank Spaziani In: Tennessee Out: Derek Dooley In: Idaho Out: Robb Akey In: Kentucky Out: Joker Phillips In: NC State Out: Tom O'Brien In: Purdue Out: Danny Hope In: UTEP Out: Mike Price In: Western Michigan Out: Bill Cubit In: Southern Mississippi might be added to this list. I wonder how happy Paul Johnson is at Georgia Tech. He would be a good fit for Tennessee or Auburn.
__________________
http://diamondvisits.blogspot.com/ My Minor League stadium review site. |
|
|
|
|
|
#578 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,567
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Quote:
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#579 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,329
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
As a CFB fan I'd love to see Colorado make the right hire. It's sad how far that program has fallen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#580 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
That's a nice list. But let's add some spice to the discussion. Which is the best job? I'd say Tennessee but Auburn would be a close 2nd, followed by Arkansas
|
|
|
|
|
|
#581 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 2,666
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Quote:
I actually think the best job on that list might be Cal. They just did some major upgrades to their factilities and still get to recruit in California. They don't have the best fan base for sure, but it isn't awful. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#582 |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,567
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
I think Auburn is the best on the list because it has great facilities with more being built, almost unlimited resources, sits in the heart of one of the best recruiting regions in the country, and has a fanbase that is zealous in their passion for the program. It can be done here and there is no doubt that a good coach can achieve at Auburn. This is off of the top of my head but I think one would have to go all the way back to Barfield to find an Auburn coach that didn't win the SEC. The media loves Saban and the Bama narrative but Auburn has out competed Bama in the modern era (i.e. since the Bear died).
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
#583 |
|
Waitin til next year
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,611
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
I would be very wary of taking the Auburn job. The NCAA is apparently launching an investigation into Auburn. I may be wrong but I think the fallout from Chizik may cause a lot of potential coaches to be hesitant. Competing against Saben in Alabama would be a huge hurdle to overcome as well.
I think Arkansas and then Tennessee would by my #1 and #2. |
|
|
|
|
|
#584 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,567
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
Quote:
There is zero concern within the Auburn athletic department. There is no investigation of Auburn's football program. Haggle over Tennesee or Auburn but Arksansas is an obvious distant option from a desireability standpoint. Resources, recruiting, tradition, etc wise, Arkansas has largely been a second tier SEC program traditionally.
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#585 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,342
|
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread
If he bails out now he is a genius, Mizzo is going to be Kentucky2 in the east.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |