|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Would you make the deal? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
33 | 73.33% |
| No |
  
|
12 | 26.67% |
| Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-30-2012, 02:02 AM
|
#1 |
|
Lets Go 'Bird' Hunting
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The University of Akron
Posts: 1,105
|
Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
I have been in a tough twitter negotiations, and I think I have made a deal with an informed Indians fan that would send Shin-Soo Choo to Cincinnati.
We would be giving up Tony Cingrani, Chris Heisey, a PTBNL (from low minor leagues) and possibly Mike Leake (though he is not apart of the original deal, and would only be given up if the Indians got something better from somewhere else). I would probably do this. Lets assume, for this exercise, that Choo is only a Red for a year. Remember that Choo bats lead-off, can play left field, and has an extremely high On Base Percentage. If the answer is no, where would you steer the negotiations? If the answer is yes, why do you like it? and Do you think a trade like this is realistic IRL. This was just a little fun that I sprung on him lol.
__________________
Hey Sparky! Indian Hill English teachers taught me everything I know! Numbers behind the Debate: Small Ball vs. Long Ball |
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 02:38 AM
|
#2 |
|
WOOOOO!!!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midland, MI
Posts: 6,077
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
So is Mike Leake in this proposal or not?
__________________
"On-base percentage is great if you can score runs and do something with that on-base percentage," Baker said. "Clogging up the bases isn't that great to me." |
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 08:36 AM
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 3,847
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Do that deal all day long if Leakes not in it
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 08:51 AM
|
#4 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,632
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Choo is a stud. I would definitely do Cingrani, Heisey and a lower level PTBNL for him. If you throw Leake in, I think we are talking about the Reds' overpaying, but if that is what it took to beat another offer, I would probably do it as long as the PTBNL was not a top 15 prospect.
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 08:55 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 388
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Either Leake or Cingrani but not both. That's an over pay at that point.
__________________
If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve! |
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:05 AM
|
#6 |
|
Redsmetz
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Winton Place
Posts: 10,450
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Are you writing for Redlegs Review these days?
http://www.redlegsreview.com/2012/11...legs+Review%29
__________________
“In the same way that a baseball season never really begins, it never really ends either.” - Lonnie Wheeler, "Bleachers, A Summer in Wrigley Field" The Baseball Emporium - Books & Things, that's Rallyonion.com The Baseball Bookstore http://tsc-sales.com/ http://tscsales.blogspot.com/ http://silverscreenbooks.com/ |
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:21 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Lets Go 'Bird' Hunting
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The University of Akron
Posts: 1,105
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Quote:
__________________
Hey Sparky! Indian Hill English teachers taught me everything I know! Numbers behind the Debate: Small Ball vs. Long Ball |
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:24 AM
|
#8 |
|
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,365
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
I've been pushing to acquire Choo since last off season. No way do I include Leake, but I'd certainly be willing to add pieces to the deal. And I'd definitely have my focus be on an extension.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:29 AM
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,480
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Quote:
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini |
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:30 AM
|
#10 | |
|
Lets Go 'Bird' Hunting
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The University of Akron
Posts: 1,105
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Quote:
I'm sure another name would help push the Reds offer over others. Perhaps you don't need Leake just to beat out another team. The core deal is the three listed above.
__________________
Hey Sparky! Indian Hill English teachers taught me everything I know! Numbers behind the Debate: Small Ball vs. Long Ball |
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:45 AM
|
#11 | |
|
2013 NL MVP and WS MVP
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,365
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:48 AM
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,702
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Too much for one year. We can't give up 2 of our 3 starting depth in one trade for a one year rental.
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:49 AM
|
#13 | |
|
Lets Go 'Bird' Hunting
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The University of Akron
Posts: 1,105
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Quote:
__________________
Hey Sparky! Indian Hill English teachers taught me everything I know! Numbers behind the Debate: Small Ball vs. Long Ball |
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 09:59 AM
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,826
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
Walt has a way of re-signing his one-year rental guys.
If the Reds could keep Corcino and Stephenson, and keep both shortstops, and have the working outlines of a possible extension with Choo, this is attractive. It's basically Leake and Cingrani for Choo. I would not dismiss such an idea. Last edited by Kc61; 11-30-2012 at 10:01 AM. |
|
|
|
|
11-30-2012, 10:10 AM
|
#15 |
|
Where's my chair?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,785
|
Re: Would You Be On Board for Shin-Soo Choo?
I really like Choo, but Leake and Cingrani is just too much for a one year rental.
I'd roll the dice and give in to whatever salary demands Ludwick wants before that. There's plenty of decent LF that could be had for less.. Another thing is according to baseball reference, he has a pending arb hearing on this year's salary, which may be quite expensive.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013!  Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot! 
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Linear Mode
