![]() |
|
|
#31 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,124
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
REPEAT $13 MILLION PER YEAR. Ludwick is going to want at least $10 Million per year... They say that he can get $3 Million More per year somewhere else... This is simple math. PASS... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 21
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 47
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Millions of dollars are on the line for this man. It is perfectly acceptable and understandable that he is taking his time and weighing all of his options
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 21
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Especially because he is waiting to hear back from Cleveland. I mean he wanted to come here last year. I guarantee if he signs with us he will say and I quote, "I always wanted to come back to Cincinnati."
|
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,124
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
Simply Put... Ludwick wants and deserves the most Money he can make... Maybe his Heart is in Cincinnati but the almighty dollar and capitalism will probably prevail in this situation. We're not talking about the difference between $180 Million and $165 Million... We're talking $14 Million and $20 Million and for this being Ludwick's last chance to cash in... He's going to take the bigger paycheck and you can't blame him... So while Victorino and Ludwick are indeed different players... I would argue hat Ludwick was a better ballplayer in 2012 than Victorino... So yeah... Ludwick wants $10 Million per year. End of Story. IMHO... I politely say "Pass." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 218
|
Re: Ludwick offer
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,124
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
Uhm, also... it's funny that that was the only response you had from my post. It's kinda like when you're arguing points with a girlfriend or wife and then she brings up something from left field and your conversation was in the realm of Football... Congratulations. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 218
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,124
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,124
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
IMHO, I wish he would've took the higher money somewhere else because I would've liked the $7.5 Million Invested to get a Lead-Off Hitter or a Mashing LF. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,884
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
Ludwick is smart, a hard worker, a class act, and perfectly fits the chemistry of this team. And chemistry is what this team has going for it. yes we need a left handed hitter. but resigning ludwick was a very good investment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,124
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
The Reds need runners on base in front of Votto, Bruce, Phillips, etc... This team's biggest weakness is no lead-off hitter, period. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
part of BBN
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,296
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Glad the Reds resigned Ludwick and I fully expect Walt to address the leadoff problem by ST.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 494
|
Re: Ludwick offer
Quote:
In principle I don't diasgree with you Hondo. But I'd say the Reds offense has been marred by two big factors: 1) Nobody on base in front of Votto 2) No protection behind Votto (knowing Dusty won't bat Bruce there) I totally agree with you that the OBP department is the more important of the two because of how prolific a hitter Joey is. But that prolificness is negated when the dude gets intentionally walked twice a night. To get the full value of guys in front of Joey, you need to have a few guys behind him. And honestly, I'm not sure that there was a better option for the dollars in free agency, especially since Ludwick came back under market value. Now, of course, the Reds still need to fix issue #1 to get the full bang out of this Ludwick deal, otherwise we'll be an offense of five hole hitters like we were last year. I still am convinced that something happens this off-season to rectify that area, especially with how frequently Walt's been linked to leadoff guys really since last trade deadline. My speculation still is that the Reds will address this through a trade. I don't think they wanted to pay market value on anyone for more than two years and, to my knowledge, none of the free agent leadoff guys have signed for fewer than 3 years or a total contract of less than $35M. I think they would rather trade away to get a guy who is already affordably under team control by contract than pay a premium for a bridge option until Billy gets here or in case he is uneffective when he does. I'm not sure there was a guy to be had for one season, $15M. It might be Bourn now with the market drying up, but honestly, did anyone expect that? Would you have gambled on the wait and see route with a Boras client? I'm honestly on the fence there. I'm wrong all the time, just thought I'd chime in. Last edited by Larkin88; 12-10-2012 at 04:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |