![]() |
|
|
#106 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,432
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
With Ludwick allegedly signed, CF seems to be the last spot to settle.
Options include a big name like Ellsbury, Fowler, and Bourn. Or a lesser name/platoon partner like DeJesus, Crisp, and de Aza. 2 Questions 1. What would you like to see Walt do? 2. What do you think he will do?
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
KungFu Fighter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 2,331
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
dp
Last edited by AtomicDumpling; 12-07-2012 at 05:56 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
KungFu Fighter
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hamilton, OH
Posts: 2,331
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
Quote:
2. I still think it will be Alejandro De Aza to platoon with Drew Stubbs in centerfield. He is not a bad option, but nothing to get excited about. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,920
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
Considering that's basically what the Twins got for Revere, a guy with a career .278/.319/.323 line in 1000+ PA, you can't blame them.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,398
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
#112 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,432
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
According to MLBTR, it seems like Fowler is a lot more likely than Bourn, who Walt said "would have to drop his asking price a lot."
Assuming the cost in talent would be substantially less, I'd prefer Ellsbury on a one-year deal to Fowler, who is signed for 2-3 years and we'd have a logjam if/when Hamilton is ready. That said, I won't be upset at all if we can get Fowler without giving up Bailey or Stephenson.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#113 | |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,430
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
Quote:
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 | |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
Quote:
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,661
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
Walt mentioned having a trade in place that fell though late. The timing says it could have been Ellsbury, or the recent rumors suggest perhaps Fowler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
Brett William Moore
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Crescent Springs KY
Posts: 3,511
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
keeping Leake gives us depth at SP. this is good in general but for the 2013 team there is an additional hitch. I don't see how Chapman pitches the entire year (and hopefully postseason) in the rotation. It seems like he needs to start or finish the year in the pen to put some sort of innings limit on him. So I'd like to keep Leake around. This means getting an everyday CF for Corcino (or Cingrani) plus Stubbs or keeping Stubbs around & getting a platoon partner via trading spare parts.
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,430
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
If they pulled out of a Fowler deal at the last minute it would make sense that Walt would then say "I don't think they want to move him." Kind of like he got left at the altar or something, eh? I wonder if his voice cracked when he said it.
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,417
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
You can have depth at SP while trading Leake. Our old pal Dustin Moseley could be signed and not be a huge drop-off from what Leake would provide.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,430
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
On a related point - why would Walt favor Ben Revere over a Fowler or a De Aza? From what I can tell, Revere is fast and a good OF, but he isn't really an on-base machine. Isn't that an essential part of what they are looking for in CF, someone to get on base ahead of the middle of the lineup? Not to mention he has ZERO power. Revere has the look of a younger Juan Pierre to me.
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Centerfield 2013
The Reds also have Lecure and Redmond for SP depth on top of Cingrani and Corcino climbing the ladder. I'd like them to add another AAA starter regardless of whether they trade Leake or Bailey, but it's not like the team doesn't have options if one of those two is dealt.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |