![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 406
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 25
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
i have a feeling the reds will make a trade by sunday and it will be Dexter Fowler
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 83
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
I'd take Fowler. De Aza will be a good player IMO but I think it'd be much riskier to trade just because we've seen less of him compared to Fowler. Honestly if De Aza for some reason would cost a lot less I'd take him. The difference between the two is very small. Bill James is projecting them to have almost identical stats in two hitters parks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 494
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Really good thread everyone, good discussion.
![]() I think what's great is if a move is made that fits the profile really of any of these players named, we'll be a much better club in 2013. I'm optimistic something will happen, just because I'm sort of a "where there's smoke, there's fire" guy. And not to beat a dead horse, but really almost anything in the OBP department is an improvement over last year. All that being said, I guess I would prefer a guy with more than one year left of team control through trade... or for that matter a one year free agent contract for Bourn. (not likely on a few levels) I love that Billy is on the way and if he pans out perfectly right away, I wouldn't mind having an outfield with a few on-base guys since we have so much pop elsewhere in the order. But I'm worried there will be some growing pains with his development, and would like some depth to platoon with him if Billy struggles or even in a platoon with him. I think we might be able to get Parra and perhaps a B/C prospect back for Didi Gregorious. I'm a big fan of Didi, but I kind of wonder if that's the most expendable chip at the moment because I'm pretty confident in Cozart's future. Arizona has an expressed interest in him. That might be the move that could impact the organization the least while filling a good platoon role with Parra until 2016. Quote:
Fowler might be the guy I'd like to see the most, even considering the rumored price (now that we've established it ain't Bailey). Of the options I think we're realistically linked to, I might like his skillset the most. I do think it's fair to assume his extra base hits might suffer some without the forgiving gaps of Colorado. But I also think his HR power will always keep pitchers honest, letting Fowler work at-bats and thrive in the OBP category. I do think it would start with Leake and Stubbs+. I would lead with Lotzkar or someone of that ilk, and it Colorado balks maybe consider Corcino. But that's probably it. No Cingrani. I'll be happy with a lot of guys out there though and am excited to see if anything happens. Last edited by Larkin88; 12-07-2012 at 10:17 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
malingered here too long
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 2,048
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Fowler, clearly.
I also agree with Larkin88 on his power potential (especially at GABP), and that Cingrani shouldn't be offered. Last edited by malcontent; 12-08-2012 at 01:14 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Alejandro De Aza all day, every day. Fowler hasn't hit away from Coors field and had a .390 BABIB in the first year he's ever hit above .266. People are getting fooled by his overall numbers due to Coors field inflated his numbers, .882 life time OPS there vs .698 on the road.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 406
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Quote:
Last edited by drowg14; 12-08-2012 at 06:57 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Quote:
He has a higher OBP with the Cards but his numbers aren't as good as they were with Colorado .319 down to .308 and SLG .552 down to .528 and those numbers are with his good but not Matt Holliday level seasons his first year and a half when he was a .800 OPS player. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 260
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
His BABIP is driven by playing in Denver and its giant park where balls find holes more than anywhere else. He has a .339 road BABIP and that's even after his high 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Defense is an issue as well, -21 Defensive Run Saved for Fowler along with a -12.9 UZR/150 in his career.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 406
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Quote:
When one plays all their games in a place like Coors, they have an approach at the plate tailored to hit there. Changing that approach for each road trip, and back for each homestead, can't be the easiest thing in the world. Getting out of Coors should help him become a better ballplayer overall. And the fact that 3 of the cities he plays the most away games in are LA, San Francisco, and San Diego can't help either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 260
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Quote:
So you are critical of his hitting because he plays in a large park but are also critical of his defense in that same park? I'm not saying he's a top notch fielder, but you can't have it both ways |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,849
|
Re: Who would you rather have?
Quote:
If Fowler got traded his home split is going to fall but his road isn't going to magically spike just like Matt's didn't. I can't recall any player who has ever put up big numbers in Denver go somewhere else and improve across the board, even Matt saw his line drop leaving town. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |