![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Sign Bourn As Rental Player? | |||
| yes, 8 million + buyout for following season makes sense. |
|
30 | 93.75% |
| No, he isn't much of an upgrade over Drew Stubbs. |
|
2 | 6.25% |
| Voters: 32. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Williamsport, PA
Posts: 12,311
|
One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
With his suitors dwindling, the article mentions the Reds could sign him to a one year deal like they did with Ryan Madison and let him re-enter free agency the following season. By then, Billy Hamilton should be ready to take over the position.
So would it make sense for the Reds to sign him to similar terms to a contract that they did to Madison? http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...the-reds-radar
__________________
If you think small, you'll go nowhere in life. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,410
|
It would make sense, yes. And WJ would once again deserve congratulations for playing the market just right.
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,372
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,218
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
Walt was asked this at Redsfest and said it would take a miracle. Bob took the microphone and said " let me answer this for Walt, no."
He went on to explain how the Madson deal was totally different last year. Who knows for 100% sure though.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,703
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
It is impossible to vote "no" based on how the question is posed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,329
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
I don't think Bourn would ever sign a one year deal with the Reds. But of course I would do it if I'm Cincinnati. But according to a poster in the Hamilton/Stanton thread, that means I should vote no. I'm so confused.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 589
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
I think if it got to the point that Bourne was willing to take a one year deal you would see enough other teams jump in that the reds wouldn't have a real chance. Theres enough money flowing in the league this year that other teams would be willing to give Bourne 8M for a year. Would be great for us if it happened but I just dont see there being any chance of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
-The Insider-
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,833
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
Hell yes I would do this. It would be very reckless not to do it if it came down to it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,682
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
Quote:
Against RHP, there are a lot of guys better than Stubbs. Even below average guys are better than Stubbs against RHP and platooning Stubbs with one would improve the team overall. The real question is can the Reds acquire somebody without blowing a hole in the team somewhere else and/or would that player be a better option than Heisey.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS Last edited by mth123; 12-09-2012 at 10:09 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Party like it's 1990
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,318
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
I bet it would take at least $10 million for one year, but I'd still do it. No long-term risk. Definitely overpaying, but you're only doing it for one season while your top prospect learns the trade. Also, it would be addressing our No. 1 need by far, that of a leadoff hitter who plays CF.
Do it! (Get to the choppa!) |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,112
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
I voted yes, but I figure with then Reds luck, he'll probably needtommy John surgery in spring training and be out the whole year, if the Reds signed him to a one year deal.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
All work and no play.....
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,787
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
It sure seems like their attempt to upgrade the most obvious need is falling way short.
If a 1-year deal for $10M or less could be done, they should do it in a heartbeat. But based on Castellini saying what he said, I don't look for it to happen. At this point, I think they ship Leake off for their less expensive leadoff answer, if they do anything at all.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic. "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,915
|
Re: One Year Rental For Michael Bourn?
This would be an almost ideal circumstance. It's not my money, but short of a Madson situation, it's hard to lose out on a 1-year deal. The guy has been a 4.5+ WAR player four 4 years in a row now.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. Last edited by RedsManRick; 12-09-2012 at 11:54 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |