![]() |
|
|
#661 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 709
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
If we think the ceiling of the franchise is a first round playoff loss, then why even watch? They've already hit their ceiling. But apparently we are to be happy with 9-7 seasons and first round playoff losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#662 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Young teams learning to win go through this type of thing, usually coaching can navigate you through ups and downs. I just don't think Marvin can get you any further than a WC. Not sure Zimmer or Gruden can get this team over the hump but I would like to give someone else a shot before another 4-5 yrs of wasting talent.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#663 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#664 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
Lets not get ahead of ourselves. It's not the Bungles anymore maybe, but they haven't proven anything else yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#665 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,396
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#666 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 709
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#667 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
The back to back streak is because we've never been able to compete with a playoff team's schedule. This year we are. We blew out the SB champs on our home field. Our two first draft selections last year made the PB and are now the face of our franchise. The defense has been amazing. I mean, the list goes on. I don't know if we'll get in, but people hanging onto teams in the past aren't being fair to the guys we currently have. We're young and talented, a bad game isn't going to suddenly take me back to 15 years ago. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#668 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#669 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Personally I like this team, lot of good young talent that I hope gets signed in the offseason to LTC. However ownership and coaching makes it hard to root for these guys somedays. Personally Marvin has taken this team about as far as it can go, I would be fine bumping Marvin to the FO next season and giving Jay or Zimmer a try. Bengals need a fresh voice as I am sure the team has started to tune Marvin out a bit. A ten yr run is a lot for any coach.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#670 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,653
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
This whole history thing of prior season failures that fans get wrapped up in and then start throwing it out after losses, and using as reminders after wins, as in "don't worry, its the Bengals, they'll screw it up" well, quite frankly, is like eating dog poop in the back yard. No thanks for me. You have at it.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#671 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Vienna, OH
Posts: 4,135
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
This is a good group of guys. Not the low-character guys of the last few years. But until they show they can get over the 1st round hump and actually compete with the big boys, I have no reason to believe they can. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#672 |
|
A Little to the Left
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
SD blew out Pittsburgh today. There aren't many gimme games in the NFL.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. --Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
|
|
#673 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
I just don't understand the need for so many Bengals fans to be so bipolar about the team. We don't have to either be the Bungles or the Superbowl favorites. There's a lot of teams in the middle and that's where we're at, trying to get better. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#674 |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,093
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
I'm going to have to admit that I'm eating a huge plate of crow right now.
I was wrong about this team. This is a pretty good football team with the potential to be great. Believe it or not, I finally came around today. Yes, they lost. I get it and it sucks - but they totally dominated the Cowboys everywhere. EVERYWHERE but the scoreboard. I love the DLine. Honestly, they just need some consistency. It's a young team that could be 10-3 right about now. They win easily today if A.J. Green shows up and doesn't have the worst game of his young life. He was awful today. Is it true they can go 2-1 (with a win over PIT) and get in? If so, I like their chances. Of course, this is all assuming they beat Philly on Thursday. That could be tough and will really tell us something about his team, if they can come back from this one on short rest and do business. They just need to forget about today. Remove it from their memory. Ironically, even though I was pulling for the 'Skins to beat Baltimore today, it was probably in the Bengals' best interest (after the Cowboy loss) that Baltimore win and lay down to us in week 17. Oh well. Crow is still yummy. Last edited by BuckeyeRedleg; 12-09-2012 at 08:48 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#675 |
|
A Little to the Left
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
I think 2-1 and a win over Pittsburgh gets them in as long as the loss is to the Eagles, since that would be an NFC loss. Don't quote me on that, it all gets confusing at this point.
The Jets are back in the picture now also, but the Bengals control their own destiny. They win out and they are in.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. --Oscar Wilde |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |