RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-09-2012, 05:02 PM   #661
5TimeWSChamps
Member
 
5TimeWSChamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 709
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redsfaithful View Post
You can't really blame fans for feeling that way until they actually have success in the playoffs.
Bingo.

If we think the ceiling of the franchise is a first round playoff loss, then why even watch? They've already hit their ceiling.

But apparently we are to be happy with 9-7 seasons and first round playoff losses
5TimeWSChamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-09-2012, 05:05 PM   #662
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5TimeWSChamps View Post
Then the team needs to fix it.

Because as soon as they actually play to win, and do something unlike the same old Bungles did, then they will turn the corner.

They are allergic to any type of success.
Young teams learning to win go through this type of thing, usually coaching can navigate you through ups and downs. I just don't think Marvin can get you any further than a WC. Not sure Zimmer or Gruden can get this team over the hump but I would like to give someone else a shot before another 4-5 yrs of wasting talent.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:05 PM   #663
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5TimeWSChamps View Post
What does a Wild Card participant get?

If you are happy being in the same exact GD spot the team has been since 2005, that's on you.
If you think we're in the same spot then I have to question whether or not you even watch the games.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:16 PM   #664
Wonderful Monds
Member
 
Wonderful Monds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stray View Post
If you think we're in the same spot then I have to question whether or not you even watch the games.
This is still a team that looked dead midseason, had an embarrassing loss to the Browns, just lost to a Cowboys team that kept shooting itself in the foot etc.

Lets not get ahead of ourselves. It's not the Bungles anymore maybe, but they haven't proven anything else yet.
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.
Wonderful Monds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:17 PM   #665
Wonderful Monds
Member
 
Wonderful Monds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
Young teams learning to win go through this type of thing, usually coaching can navigate you through ups and downs. I just don't think Marvin can get you any further than a WC. Not sure Zimmer or Gruden can get this team over the hump but I would like to give someone else a shot before another 4-5 yrs of wasting talent.
The timeout scenario today was inexcusable. Let the Cowboys play completely easy to end the game.
__________________
They don't think it be like it is, but it do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Schuler View Post
He has also taught me that even when the Reds win it is important to focus on the fact that they could have lost.
Wonderful Monds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:20 PM   #666
5TimeWSChamps
Member
 
5TimeWSChamps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 709
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stray View Post
If you think we're in the same spot then I have to question whether or not you even watch the games.
Ok, what has changed in the Franchise's history between 2005 and now?

Just 2 additional 1st round playoff losses, that's it
5TimeWSChamps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:23 PM   #667
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wonderful Monds View Post
This is still a team that looked dead midseason, had an embarrassing loss to the Browns, just lost to a Cowboys team that kept shooting itself in the foot etc.

Lets not get ahead of ourselves. It's not the Bungles anymore maybe, but they haven't proven anything else yet.
I never said they've proven anything. I'm saying that if you're objective it's impossible to make a connection with the team we have now and the Bungle/jailbird teams.

The back to back streak is because we've never been able to compete with a playoff team's schedule. This year we are. We blew out the SB champs on our home field. Our two first draft selections last year made the PB and are now the face of our franchise. The defense has been amazing. I mean, the list goes on.

I don't know if we'll get in, but people hanging onto teams in the past aren't being fair to the guys we currently have. We're young and talented, a bad game isn't going to suddenly take me back to 15 years ago.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:25 PM   #668
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5TimeWSChamps View Post
Ok, what has changed in the Franchise's history between 2005 and now?

Just 2 additional 1st round playoff losses, that's it
You seem like the kind of fan that wants to talk yourself into being miserable, lets just agree to disagree and let it go.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:35 PM   #669
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Personally I like this team, lot of good young talent that I hope gets signed in the offseason to LTC. However ownership and coaching makes it hard to root for these guys somedays. Personally Marvin has taken this team about as far as it can go, I would be fine bumping Marvin to the FO next season and giving Jay or Zimmer a try. Bengals need a fresh voice as I am sure the team has started to tune Marvin out a bit. A ten yr run is a lot for any coach.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:36 PM   #670
traderumor
Unsolicited Opinions
 
traderumor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,653
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5TimeWSChamps View Post
Then the team needs to fix it.

Because as soon as they actually play to win, and do something unlike the same old Bungles did, then they will turn the corner.

They are allergic to any type of success.
I don't find anything here that has anything to do with the results obtained by the 2012 Bengals, good or bad. Jeff Blake, Ickey Woods, Boomer Esiason, Takeo Spikes, Carl Pickens, Bruce Coslet...none of them has had one bit of impact on the 2012 Bengals. They lost a tough game today, just like NFL teams do every week of every season.

This whole history thing of prior season failures that fans get wrapped up in and then start throwing it out after losses, and using as reminders after wins, as in "don't worry, its the Bengals, they'll screw it up" well, quite frankly, is like eating dog poop in the back yard. No thanks for me. You have at it.
__________________
Can't win with 'em

Can't win without 'em
traderumor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 05:45 PM   #671
cincrazy
Member
 
cincrazy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Vienna, OH
Posts: 4,135
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stray View Post
I never said they've proven anything. I'm saying that if you're objective it's impossible to make a connection with the team we have now and the Bungle/jailbird teams.

The back to back streak is because we've never been able to compete with a playoff team's schedule. This year we are. We blew out the SB champs on our home field. Our two first draft selections last year made the PB and are now the face of our franchise. The defense has been amazing. I mean, the list goes on.

I don't know if we'll get in, but people hanging onto teams in the past aren't being fair to the guys we currently have. We're young and talented, a bad game isn't going to suddenly take me back to 15 years ago.
Yes, they beat the Giants. They also lost to a Cowboys team that had no interest in winning, the Dolphins, the Browns, and three of their four wins during this last streak came against SD, KC and Oakland, three of the most dysfunctional teams in the league.

This is a good group of guys. Not the low-character guys of the last few years. But until they show they can get over the 1st round hump and actually compete with the big boys, I have no reason to believe they can.
cincrazy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 07:43 PM   #672
Redsfaithful
A Little to the Left
 
Redsfaithful's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

SD blew out Pittsburgh today. There aren't many gimme games in the NFL.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
--Oscar Wilde
Redsfaithful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 08:22 PM   #673
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by cincrazy View Post
Yes, they beat the Giants. They also lost to a Cowboys team that had no interest in winning, the Dolphins, the Browns, and three of their four wins during this last streak came against SD, KC and Oakland, three of the most dysfunctional teams in the league.

This is a good group of guys. Not the low-character guys of the last few years. But until they show they can get over the 1st round hump and actually compete with the big boys, I have no reason to believe they can.
How did the Cowboys have no interest in winning? Their players get paid too, and they're also in a playoff race.

I just don't understand the need for so many Bengals fans to be so bipolar about the team. We don't have to either be the Bungles or the Superbowl favorites. There's a lot of teams in the middle and that's where we're at, trying to get better.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 08:45 PM   #674
BuckeyeRedleg
Will post for food
 
BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,093
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

I'm going to have to admit that I'm eating a huge plate of crow right now.

I was wrong about this team.

This is a pretty good football team with the potential to be great. Believe it or not, I finally came around today. Yes, they lost. I get it and it sucks - but they totally dominated the Cowboys everywhere. EVERYWHERE but the scoreboard.

I love the DLine. Honestly, they just need some consistency. It's a young team that could be 10-3 right about now. They win easily today if A.J. Green shows up and doesn't have the worst game of his young life. He was awful today.

Is it true they can go 2-1 (with a win over PIT) and get in? If so, I like their chances.

Of course, this is all assuming they beat Philly on Thursday. That could be tough and will really tell us something about his team, if they can come back from this one on short rest and do business. They just need to forget about today. Remove it from their memory.

Ironically, even though I was pulling for the 'Skins to beat Baltimore today, it was probably in the Bengals' best interest (after the Cowboy loss) that Baltimore win and lay down to us in week 17.

Oh well. Crow is still yummy.

Last edited by BuckeyeRedleg; 12-09-2012 at 08:48 PM.
BuckeyeRedleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-09-2012, 09:14 PM   #675
Redsfaithful
A Little to the Left
 
Redsfaithful's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bexley, OH
Posts: 7,417
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

I think 2-1 and a win over Pittsburgh gets them in as long as the loss is to the Eagles, since that would be an NFC loss. Don't quote me on that, it all gets confusing at this point.

The Jets are back in the picture now also, but the Bengals control their own destiny. They win out and they are in.
__________________
We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars.
--Oscar Wilde
Redsfaithful is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25