![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,388
|
James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
Marc Topkin
@TBTimes_Rays Quote:
Gotta figure Myers is heading to Tampa.
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Who, What, Where, When?
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,531
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
It looks like it's for Myers & other prospects
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Who, What, Where, When?
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,531
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
Shields, Davis, & a PTBNL for Wil Myers, Jake Odorizzi, Mike Montgomery, & Patrick Leonard
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,455
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
Hate this trade for the Royals. Maybe if they were one pitcher away from being a world series contender and their window was closing this would make sense.
But moving Myers, in addition to multiple interesting pitching prospects for a pitcher I would not characterize as an ace, on a team that had a strong enough farm system to stay the course for another few years I think this could be very costly long term. Shields, Davis, Santana, Guthrie.... still not that strong of a rotation considering the cash and prospects it was required to shell out. I don't think they were ready for a move like this for another few seasons. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,089
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
Quote:
I wonder if the Rays are rebuilding, and if Price will be available soon.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,089
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
Quote:
I will note that Montgomery had a real bad year last year, but Myers and Odorizzi themselves are worth more than Shields and Davis.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
All work and no play.....
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,747
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
One of the dumber trades I've seen in awhile.
KC should be modeling their rebuilding after the Reds. They simply should have brought up their top pitching prospects (if ready) and Wil Myers and let them grow in the majors. Maybe traded away some older parts for lots of prospects. Rebuild the farm system like the Reds have done. A few good pitchers aren't going to help that team right now.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic. "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,364
|
So much for the Royals being relevant anytime soon. They probably just set themselves back a couple years, IMO.
Wouldn't mind David Price, who's already been rumored as available. I wouldn't want to pay Hamilton for him though, so no dice I guess. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
post hype sleeper
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 10,350
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
I feel really bad for Royals fans, and I actually like Shields. Dayton Moore should seriously go before the firing squad for this one.
The usually level-headed Rany Jazayerli, M.D., gives the deal a two-word review: http://www.ranyontheroyals.com/2012/...lds-trade.html
__________________
On Dasher On Dancer On Prancer Ondrusek |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,089
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
The worst part of the deal is that both Shields and Davis have big contracts. For the amount of money the Royals will have to pay them, they could have just signed Lohse or Sanchez and kept their prospects.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Section 525-Saturdays.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: New Paris, OH
Posts: 1,973
|
You know what they say, anytime you can trade your farm to go from bad to mediocre, you gotta do it.
Wait. No one ever says that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,674
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
Quote:
Going from the AL East to the AL Central will likely do good things for Shields and Davis. Still, I see this as a rather large overpay.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hoping to be 75769013
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,089
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
That's a good point. But I still think they could have spent the $30+M better somehow, and not given up prospects.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,674
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
I agree. There were better ways to spend the money without losing the prospects, but they were able to add some impact talent rather than average talent.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,455
|
Re: James Shields and Wade Davis traded to Kansas City
If I were them, I would have stayed the course with the prospects.
Could have done a similar move to what they did with Santana, in getting Haren locked in for a year. He's probably not quite Shields at the moment, but he's pretty close. Shields could just as easily follow Haren's career arch anyways considering how similar pitchers they are. There were plenty of ways to make improvements to their pitching staff this year considering the money they have been able to take on with Guthrie, Santana, Shields, and Davis. I liked their plan up until tonight where they seemed committed to not locking in dumb contracts. It gave them the opportunity to field a reasonable ballclub and hold onto their prospects. Once the Moustakas/Hosmer/Myers group and young pitching started to successfully transistion to the majors, that's when you maybe thing about making the major splash and move the prospect surplus. The rest of the team just hasn't proven their worth enough to make the fit right now. Completely missed the timing on this. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |