![]() |
|
|
#46 |
|
Ojo Rojo
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Moving to Atlanta in July
Posts: 4,436
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Can we all get the spelling of his name down now, prior to the signing? It's H-A-N-N-A-H-A-N. ;-)
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,131
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Done deal.
1 year, $2M
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 921
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Nice signing. Felt way more comfortable with him than Burris.
__________________
"I never argue with people who say baseball is boring, because baseball is boring. And then, suddenly, it isn't. And that's what makes it great." - Joe Posnanski 2013 Attendance Record 1-0 (4/3 Angels 5-4) |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,848
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Hannahan hits righties ok. Jason Donald sometimes hits lefties ok.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Lime in da Coconut
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Rainelle, WV
Posts: 7,712
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Worrying about the backups is like worrying about 12/21/2012. Useless.
__________________
www.ris-news.com "The price of seeking to force our beliefs on others is that someday they might force their beliefs on us." Mario Cuomo "You only have to bat a thousand in two things; flying and heart transplants. Everything else you can go 4-for-5." -Beano Cook |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,662
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Not a bad guy to have on the bench.
__________________
I miss Adam Dunn. |
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,668
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Quote:
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,131
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Back in the day, this would be the big move of the offseason....
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 | |
|
Where's my chair?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,807
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Quote:
It's sure nice now to sign guys like this for the bench. Nice move. He's obviously a backup player, but not an embarrassment to send to the plate as a LH pinch hitter (as some of the Reds LH bench hitters before XPaul were last year). All that's left for Walt to do is find another LH reliever for the pen
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013! ![]() Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
This is really nit picking as I couldn't be happier with the state of the Reds and Walt Jocketty, but am I missing something here?
$2MM for a (obviously backup) corner infielder who has a .671 career OPS and never hit double digit HR in a season? I'd think they could replicate his production for less with a Henry Rodriguez, Beau Mills or Neftali Soto, let alone bringing Rolen back for one more go-round.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 | |
|
Has big taste
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,704
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Quote:
__________________
There is no such thing as a pitching prospect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#57 | |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,464
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Quote:
Hannahan doesn't do much of anything very well, but he can play numerous positions at a more than adequate level, and can handle the bat to a degree that is better than pure suck. It balances out to being an above replacement level player, which besides H-Rod, I can't say the same about the other options. The $2M to Hannahan wont hold the Reds back from doing something more constructive. As a team looking to contend again, it would suck to lose a win or two on the margins of the roster because we cheaped out and let sub replacement fodder get overexposed to playing time if/when injuries hit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Quote:
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#59 | |
|
One and a half men
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,464
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Quote:
There might not be many guys available that late, and if so, it might cost a propsect in addition to the 2M. The way I see it, both guys will get plenty of usage. If anyone of Donald, Phillips, Frazier, Hannahan, Cozart, Votto go down, then H-Rod is the first to get called up. We'll need more than one guy, and considering H-Rod is still minor league eligible, it makes more sense to add a guy to the major league mix right now, otherwise the type of talent you are going to find at this point that is willing to start the year in the minor leagues is going to be of the replacement level talent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Reds close to signing Jack Hannahan?
Quote:
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |