RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-13-2012, 09:35 AM   #1
RedsBrick
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 212
Over-under for 2013?

It gets me every time when I see reports about the Astros shopping for a DH. Keep forgetting they're heading to the AL.

With that thought in mind (and those almost guaranteed victories), do you think the 2013 Reds meet, exceed or fall short of the win total from 2012?
RedsBrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-13-2012, 09:42 AM   #2
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,562
Re: Over-under for 2013?

I have them at 95 wins. So just shy of last year's total. Although I think they will be a better team. I am not going to use the "L" word with respect to their 2012 victory total. But I believe it was the case.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!!
texasdave is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 10:19 AM   #3
Alpha Zero
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 222
Re: Over-under for 2013?

I think 95 wins is probably a good number. The offense is much improved, but the pitching will likely take a bit of a hit since the staff likely won't remain completely healthy for the entire year again.
Alpha Zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 01:11 PM   #4
Bob Sheed
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 176
Re: Over-under for 2013?

Chapman is the big variable.

If he excels in his new role as a starter, 95 wins seems attainable.

If he struggles, it could cost the Reds the playoffs.
__________________
Phillips declined to speak for reporters, but Cueto minced no words.

“I see that I have great numbers,” he said. “I thought the way I pitched this year, I’d have a chance to go to the All-Star Game. I don’t know what happened. I don’t if know the manager of All-Star Game is pissed at me because I went out with one of his girlfriends.”
Bob Sheed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 01:39 PM   #5
nheath22
Member
 
nheath22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 62
Re: Over-under for 2013?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alpha Zero View Post
I think 95 wins is probably a good number. The offense is much improved, but the pitching will likely take a bit of a hit since the staff likely won't remain completely healthy for the entire year again.
Regardless of health issues which are likely to occur at some point, I think our pitching will regress more because of Arroyo. While he has been a consistent force for us over the past several years, he is bound for some regression after the stellar season he put together in 2012. While I hope that I am wrong and he remains in the same form as last season, I would expect him to fall back towards his career average of around 4.3 ERA rather than the 3.7 he put together in 12', which probably loses a few more games for us.

We also have to expect Chapman to have some ups and downs during his first year as a starter. Even in a best case scenario, he will have some bad starts as any first year starter has. We should mainly be hoping he pulls it together towards the end of the season like Latos did last year to be a force in the playoffs.

Because of these two factors, I think our starters regress some in terms of the regular season which puts us in the 91 or 92 win range, and will hopefully be good enough to take another NL Central title. I think we will be a better team that last year, but our record probably won't show it right away.
__________________
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi
nheath22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 01:46 PM   #6
texasdave
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,562
Re: Over-under for 2013?

Quote:
I think we will be a better team that last year, but our record probably won't show it right away.
I hope I am wrong and this team tops the century mark. But I could not agree more strongly.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!!
texasdave is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 04:22 PM   #7
SweetLou1990
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 170
Re: Over-under for 2013?

Whats the lowest number that we cn expect and whats the highest number that we can expect? I think the expectations are in the 88 ~ 98 range, so I'm going with 93, but def want to see the 95 ~ 98 range.
__________________
Pete Campbell: A man like you I'd follow into combat blindfolded, and I wouldn't be the first. Am I right, buddy?
Don Draper: Let's take it a little slower. I don't want to wake up pregnant.
SweetLou1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 04:27 PM   #8
coachpipe
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 195
Re: Over-under for 2013?

how does 162-0 sound? Cant be too far off
coachpipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 04:33 PM   #9
SweetLou1990
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 170
Re: Over-under for 2013?

Quote:
Originally Posted by coachpipe View Post
how does 162-0 sound? Cant be too far off
OK - we can go with that!
__________________
Pete Campbell: A man like you I'd follow into combat blindfolded, and I wouldn't be the first. Am I right, buddy?
Don Draper: Let's take it a little slower. I don't want to wake up pregnant.
SweetLou1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 05:17 PM   #10
Ironman92
Member
 
Ironman92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,084
91-93
Ironman92 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 05:37 PM   #11
40YrRedsFan
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Big Bear City, CA
Posts: 360
Re: Over-under for 2013?

Reds will win 90 games, no more. With only 3 games against the Astros instead of 15 or 16, having to play teams like the Angels (now with Hamilton), Rangers, etc, we won't win as many as last year. If Ludwick can't match last year's production, we could still have troubles offensively with our team's tendency to strike out. Even with Choo in the lineup, we still have offensive question marks regarding Frazier, Hanigan, Cozart.
40YrRedsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 05:45 PM   #12
40YrRedsFan
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Big Bear City, CA
Posts: 360
Re: Over-under for 2013?

In addition to my previous post, April 2013 could be a very tough month unless we come out of the gate smoking. Angels for 3, Nationals for 7, Cardinals for 5, Phillies for 3, Pirates for 3. A very tough start to the season.
40YrRedsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 08:05 PM   #13
RedsBrick
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 212
Re: Over-under for 2013?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40YrRedsFan View Post
Reds will win 90 games, no more. With only 3 games against the Astros instead of 15 or 16, having to play teams like the Angels (now with Hamilton), Rangers, etc, we won't win as many as last year. If Ludwick can't match last year's production, we could still have troubles offensively with our team's tendency to strike out. Even with Choo in the lineup, we still have offensive question marks regarding Frazier, Hanigan, Cozart.
I think Frazier will be an unknown. I believe Hanigan will have a similar year to the one he had in 2012....with, hopefully, a little more pop.

I believe Cozart will have a better year in 2013. Hopefully being down the line-up will help him be a little more relaxed at the plate, feeling less pressure. Here's hoping he can improve his numbers even 10%, which would give him a slash of .271/.317/.756. If he can hover around his HR total of 15 - 20 and increase his RBI production to 50 - 60, I would call that a successful year. I think he's got it in him.
RedsBrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 10:38 PM   #14
LexRedsFan
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 364
Re: Over-under for 2013?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 40YrRedsFan View Post
Nationals for 7
Second straight year, no? I hate getting the season series out of the way SO early.
LexRedsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-13-2012, 10:57 PM   #15
Spider Tre
Buckethead
 
Spider Tre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 137
Re: Over-under for 2013?

i'd say 92 or 93 wins
__________________
Reds record when attended in 2011: 0-1
Reds record when attended in 2010: 1-0

Mute FS-OHIO; Turn on WLW
Spider Tre is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25