![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 202
|
Over-under for 2013?
It gets me every time when I see reports about the Astros shopping for a DH. Keep forgetting they're heading to the AL.
With that thought in mind (and those almost guaranteed victories), do you think the 2013 Reds meet, exceed or fall short of the win total from 2012? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,530
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
I have them at 95 wins. So just shy of last year's total. Although I think they will be a better team. I am not going to use the "L" word with respect to their 2012 victory total. But I believe it was the case.
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 218
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
I think 95 wins is probably a good number. The offense is much improved, but the pitching will likely take a bit of a hit since the staff likely won't remain completely healthy for the entire year again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 172
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
Chapman is the big variable.
If he excels in his new role as a starter, 95 wins seems attainable. If he struggles, it could cost the Reds the playoffs.
__________________
Phillips declined to speak for reporters, but Cueto minced no words. “I see that I have great numbers,” he said. “I thought the way I pitched this year, I’d have a chance to go to the All-Star Game. I don’t know what happened. I don’t if know the manager of All-Star Game is pissed at me because I went out with one of his girlfriends.” |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 62
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
Quote:
We also have to expect Chapman to have some ups and downs during his first year as a starter. Even in a best case scenario, he will have some bad starts as any first year starter has. We should mainly be hoping he pulls it together towards the end of the season like Latos did last year to be a force in the playoffs. Because of these two factors, I think our starters regress some in terms of the regular season which puts us in the 91 or 92 win range, and will hopefully be good enough to take another NL Central title. I think we will be a better team that last year, but our record probably won't show it right away.
__________________
"The dictionary is the only place that success comes before work. Hard work is the price we must pay for success. I think you can accomplish anything if you're willing to pay the price." -Vince Lombardi |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,530
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
Quote:
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 170
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
Whats the lowest number that we cn expect and whats the highest number that we can expect? I think the expectations are in the 88 ~ 98 range, so I'm going with 93, but def want to see the 95 ~ 98 range.
__________________
Pete Campbell: A man like you I'd follow into combat blindfolded, and I wouldn't be the first. Am I right, buddy? Don Draper: Let's take it a little slower. I don't want to wake up pregnant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 192
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
how does 162-0 sound? Cant be too far off
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: West Central Ohio
Posts: 170
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
OK - we can go with that!
__________________
Pete Campbell: A man like you I'd follow into combat blindfolded, and I wouldn't be the first. Am I right, buddy? Don Draper: Let's take it a little slower. I don't want to wake up pregnant. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,084
|
91-93
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Big Bear City, CA
Posts: 360
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
Reds will win 90 games, no more. With only 3 games against the Astros instead of 15 or 16, having to play teams like the Angels (now with Hamilton), Rangers, etc, we won't win as many as last year. If Ludwick can't match last year's production, we could still have troubles offensively with our team's tendency to strike out. Even with Choo in the lineup, we still have offensive question marks regarding Frazier, Hanigan, Cozart.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Big Bear City, CA
Posts: 360
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
In addition to my previous post, April 2013 could be a very tough month unless we come out of the gate smoking. Angels for 3, Nationals for 7, Cardinals for 5, Phillies for 3, Pirates for 3. A very tough start to the season.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 202
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
Quote:
I believe Cozart will have a better year in 2013. Hopefully being down the line-up will help him be a little more relaxed at the plate, feeling less pressure. Here's hoping he can improve his numbers even 10%, which would give him a slash of .271/.317/.756. If he can hover around his HR total of 15 - 20 and increase his RBI production to 50 - 60, I would call that a successful year. I think he's got it in him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 364
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Buckethead
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 137
|
Re: Over-under for 2013?
i'd say 92 or 93 wins
__________________
Reds record when attended in 2011: 0-1
Reds record when attended in 2010: 1-0 Mute FS-OHIO; Turn on WLW |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |