![]() |
|
|
#106 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 167
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
I agree on all points. I'm glad the Reds are not in a position where HRod would basically be forced into MLB action next season as a utility player. I expect that being successful as a utility player takes the right mindset, and I doubt that a young player like HRod would be comfortable in that role right now. In fact, if his defense improves enough I think HRod's potential is more than a utility player (particularly if he could ever play at least average defense at 2B) - because the one thing he's always been able to do (post injury 2012 notwithstanding) is hit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
Have Faith In Dusty
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: O-H-I-O
Posts: 712
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Hannahan was a good signing. I expect he will get plenty of time vs RH pitchers at 3rd base. I just dont see Frazier playing that well for a full year. Dont get me wrong I love Todd but I see him as a super utility player in the future. I dont know why but thats just what he seems to be for me. I hope Im wrong. Hannahans D is comparable to Rolens and I bet he has a stronger arm. I dont know about him playing SS but I remember last year he filled in nicely at 1st for the Tribe. I think it would be safe to say Jack only gets time at 3rd however because Frazier would play 1st if Votto isnt in the lineup. Our 2 weaknesses going into the Hot Stove season were bench depth and a leadoff guy that can get on base. Walt accomplished both those goals and Im super excited for 2013. Now if we can get a LH loogy for the pen this team is all but set barring injury.
__________________
"Losing feels worse than winning feels good." -Vin Scully |
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Danger is my business!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Back in Florida
Posts: 7,907
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
The new schedule makes it important to invest in the bench. A few more interleague games per year (up from 15 to 20 IIRC) and scattered throughout the year, makes flexibility very important. Moves like this one address that.
__________________
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it." http://dalmady.blogspot.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,412
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
ctrent @ctrent
Jack Hannahan's deal with #Reds is two years with a club option. Should be announced today |
|
|
|
|
|
#110 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,046
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Quote:
No way. My guess is Rolen really isn't going to play, but if he does the Reds will have to accomodate him in some other way. Hannahan is here to stay. Walt called him the best utility player available. I love this signing. The Reds now have five lefty hitters, including Choo who is tremendous against righties. This should provide for a major offensive improvement for this team. Jocketty fixed the pitching last year and IMO has fixed the offense this year. Wonderful job. Last edited by Kc61; 12-13-2012 at 09:40 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#111 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,665
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
The 2 year deal with an option can't make Henry Rodriguez very happy. Or David Vidal for that matter (although his ETA wasn't likely before 2015 anyway).
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 | |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,684
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Quote:
Same with Henry Rodriguez. He did very little in his 221 AAA PAs (.244/.264/.333). I would much prefer him to get everyday AAA PAs to work on improving his offensive game while also getting the field time to improve his defensive game rather than have him rot on the Major League bench. Both Vidal and HRod need work. They should not worry about being Frazier's backup. Both should worry about improving their games so if Frazier's 2012 was an abberation, they are ready to step in and take the role. I also would like to go on to say that if this Hannahan deal is the two year for 2M a year deal with a Reds' club option for a third year we are hearing reported now, I am very happy with this signing. My Indians' fans friends love Hannahan's glove and I like what he can do vs. right-handed pitching. He should be a great start with a ground ball pitcher on the mound for the Reds and a righty starting for the other team. He will also be a solid defensive replacement and could be a decent lefty bat off the bench. Worlds more valuable than Cairo in my mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,988
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Well, if Jocketty's track record is any indication, Rodriguez at least won't be here all that long. He doesn't usually let MLB ready talent linger in AAA if they can be turned in to major leaguers (or younger prospects).
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#114 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,046
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Quote:
At this point in the Reds development most prospects are trade material. Not all of them, some still break through, Frazier, Hoover, Mes last year, but fewer prospects are becoming Reds, more prospects are being traded. Reds have traded Alonso, Francisco, Boxberger, Grandal, Gregorius, Sappelt, Torreyes, in the last year from the prospect ranks. Probably more I'm forgetting. Last edited by Kc61; 12-13-2012 at 10:39 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 3,949
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
HRod needs to force either a trade or oromotion by playing well in Louisville. That simply would give Reds ammo for setting up 2014 or good prospects to add to lower levels for future years. Same with Vidal. For a couple years anyway, position prospects let Walt trade to balance the budget and stay on top. Right now at least on paper this team looks as set up for a run as any team in Reds history short of the BRM going into 72. I mean from the big league team to the actual prospects, particularly quality pitchers and a potential game wrecker CFer this whole organization is flush. Only injuries might derail a nice run imo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#116 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 4,417
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
https://twitter.com/JonHeymanCBS
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,749
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Not realizing how bad the combined effort was from the bench, I didn't like this signing that much. Now, I add Cairo, Valdez, Costanzo, and Harris together and wow, this is a mega upgrade!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#118 | |
|
Where's my chair?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,890
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Quote:
![]() I really like this signing. I like getting Donald as well.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013! ![]() Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: The Bush Leagues
Posts: 8,433
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Irish names lend themselves to limericks:
Handsome Jack Hannahan With the glove he could top any man But give him a stick And he wasn't too quick That's ok, he's our handsome Jack Hannahan.
__________________
The widow is gathering nettles for her children's dinner; a perfumed seigneur, delicately lounging in the Oeil de Boeuf, hath an alchemy whereby he will extract the third nettle and call it rent. ~ Carlyle |
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
Has big taste
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,730
|
Re: Reds sign Jack Hannahan
Quote:
Shin-Soo Choo, hamstring Shin-Soo Choo, hamstring, Shin-Soo Hamstring hamstring choo I wasn't going to bring it up but I mean, if we're doing companion player poetry and all.
__________________
There is no such thing as a pitching prospect. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |