![]() |
|
|
#601 | |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,567
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#602 |
|
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
|
Re: College Football Realignment
If there were no other options for the SEC I could see taking them. That being said, I'd rather look at UVA or Virginia Tech and NC State first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#603 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,342
|
Re: College Football Realignment
The SEC has been hard to read, A&M came to them first, I do think it will be a huge mistake on their part if they let the b1g into SEC states (Georgia), inviting Tech back might piss the pups off but it's better for the conference.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#604 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: College Football Realignment
I'll believe the BE7 split when I see it. I think working on something with Memphis, Temple, SMU (Larry Brown), UC & Uconn (which those last two can't wait to leave), may be best while adding Xavier and a few others. It's always been a jacked up conference, now it's just a little bit moreso. I don't really care for St. Johns (purgatory), Providance (biblical history), DePaul (leperacy), Seton Hall (lukewarm). Those teams do almost nothing for me, or perhaps even less than nothing. Georgetown is the only team that has a clearly better tradition than Xavier. Villanova and Marquette have some FF's, but are largely the very same as Xavier. I'm just not feeling the huge upgrade. Nor am I feeling like this is all bound to happen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#605 |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,483
|
Re: College Football Realignment
DeCourcy article on UConn and UC's plan of action:
http://aol.sportingnews.com/ncaa-bas...nt-connecticut
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? |
|
|
|
|
|
#606 |
|
Five Tool Fool
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,567
|
Re: College Football Realignment
UConn, Cincinnati, South Florida, Memphis, Temple, Boise State, San Diego State, UNLV, New Mexico and possibly BYU or Central Florida?
Color me unwilling to watch.
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner |
|
|
|
|
|
#607 | |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,329
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
Got your conference championship game site all picked out. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#608 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: College Football Realignment
That looks like a good bracket from the NCAA tourney. There are several horrible games football wise, though. IMO, these national arrangements will be laughed at and demolished within 5 years, especially if their other sports will have to put up with this travel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#609 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,655
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#610 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
Better off being in a regional area to minimize travel costs.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#611 |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,483
|
Re: College Football Realignment
You're an SEC guy. Honestly, I wouldn't expect you to watch.
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? |
|
|
|
|
|
#612 | |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,483
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
As for football, I hear a lot about travel costs, etc... but that isn't important right now. Everyone outside of the ACC, B1G, B12, P10, and SEC is in a scramble to become the most relevant conference of the have nots. With the new playoff and bowl structure, you've got every incentive to maximize SoS and try to monopolize the one at large bowl bid. Otherwise, it's a toss up between everyone outside of the big 5. That's why you won't see UC joining the MAC or some other
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? Last edited by wolfboy; 12-14-2012 at 01:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#613 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 532
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Quote:
The program is moving in the right direction internally, the administration and BOT are finally showing the willingness to invest in the future of the athletic department and they're one or two defections away from ending up in one of the five remaining power conferences. The second UC decided to join the MAC all of this progress would come to a screeching halt and the program would never recover. I'd much rather eat the costs of extra travel expenses playing the best of the rest and waiting for a seat at the table than simply walking away. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#614 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,886
|
Re: College Football Realignment
I might need a translation but if you're saying Xavier has as good a "tradition" as Marquette, you need to spend a little time in the library. Start with A for Al.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#615 |
|
On the brink
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: is everything
Posts: 2,483
|
Re: College Football Realignment
Agreed. Xavier hasn't even made a final four. Marquette has a national championship, a runner up, and three final four appearances. Xavier has made a few elite eights, but Marquette has gone to three times as many. Xavier has a lot to be proud of, but that's just silly.
__________________
How do we know he's not Mel Torme? |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |