![]() |
|
|
#871 | |
|
Will post for food
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,099
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
As you said, worst case the punt is a touchback and it 's a 15 yard net, but at least you'd still have Pittsburgh backed up in a low scoring/field position type of game. Not getting it on 4th and 22 you give Pittsburgh pretty decent field position. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#872 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#873 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,332
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Well, Bengals are locked into the 6th seed even if Colts lose as far as I can tell. That means the Bengals either face Denver, Houston, or New England depending on the results of next week's games.
All of them are flawed, but if I had to choose, I'd pick Houston.
__________________
Thank goodness for baseball. |
|
|
|
|
|
#874 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,131
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Mike Zimmer deserves NFL's Coach of the Year
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
|
|
#875 |
|
15 game winner
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sultanes de Monterrey
Posts: 4,172
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
There's an outside chance Baltimore could jump to 3 and play the Bengals back-to-back weeks. With the Bengals having nothing to play for next week, I'd imagine they'll run as vanilla a scheme as possible to avoid showing the Ravens anything interesting just in case they play again right away, plus give plenty of rest to the starters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#876 |
|
What Me Worry?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,421
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
All I can say is "God Bless the Cincinnati Bengals for ending the Squealers season, AND DOING SO IN PITTSBURGH!"
I loved watching the empty expressions on the Steeler sideline as the game became final. Can't wait to get to work this morning and really give it to a buddy of mine who is one of the biggest, arrogant, loud-mouths, when it comes to the Steelers. He comes to work every day and mocks Bengal and Brown fans (and also Red fans).... so he deserves it! "revenge is a dish best served cold" LOL
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations |
|
|
|
|
|
#877 |
|
OlafTheBlack
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 2,039
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Ok, folks...things to love about Marvin Lewis:
He's a fantastic evaluator of talent He gets a great deal out of that talent He puts together a solid game plan He motivates his team to win Now, if they could just lock him up in a windowless room with no communication devices for the three hours or so from the start of the game to the end of the game, he'd be perfect. His in-game decisions are just...just...mind blowing. It's like he's trying to out-clever himself or something.
__________________
Genius|Madness "Somebody will be bigger, stronger and faster than you, growing up," Griffey said with a shrug. "So why worry about it? As long as you don't let them outwork you, and you can look yourself in the mirror, then that's all you should worry about. Never worry about what somebody else is doing." |
|
|
|
|
|
#878 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 739
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Hey, don't forget the 3rd and 1 Hail Mary.
__________________
Choo got it, dude. |
|
|
|
|
|
#879 | |
|
We are back!
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Warsaw, IN
Posts: 675
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
__________________
...and this one belongs to the Reds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#880 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,667
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
That's on Gruden or Dalton.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#881 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,760
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#882 |
|
Winning is fun.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 632
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Is it just me or is the defense always better when Pat Sims is healthy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#883 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,667
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Go ahead and pass for it, just a higher percentage selection. A slant, a quick out, a QB draw for that matter. The most frustrating part of it for me is that they get the first down there and they were one first down away from FG range. Such a low percentage pass on 3rd and 1 was not a very smart call.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#884 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 6,854
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Yep. I don't know if it's him specifically being better than the two starting DT's. But a healthy Sims is such an improvement over the other reserve DT's that there's a direct impact of playing over them and an indirect impact in the coaches being more willing to rotate Peko and Atkins which helps keep them fresher.
__________________
When people say that I don’t know what I’m talking about when it comes to sports or writing, I think: Man, you should see me in the rest of my life. ---Joe Posnanski |
|
|
|
|
|
#885 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion
Team is loaded with young talent and built for a run. Unfortunately it's a team that is going to get expensive quick, part of me is glad they haven't been big players in FA another part is worried Mike Brown will balk at paying out contracts. Johnson, Rey, and Andre Smith are free agents after the season, with Dunlap, Atkins, Green and Dalton on the horizon. It will be interesting to see what transpires in the coming months for extensions.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. Last edited by KoryMac5; 12-24-2012 at 05:27 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |