![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Bunn-O-matic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sugarcreek, Ohio
Posts: 2,705
|
Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
link: Hanrahan to Red Sox
I say the Reds need to trade for Hanrahan. How awesome would it be to have Hanigan, Hanahan, and Hanrahan on the same team?
__________________
For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
That was my plan to get Tim McCarver to retire.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Bunn-O-matic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sugarcreek, Ohio
Posts: 2,705
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
The only thing better would be a team that had Pokey, Gookie, and Corky. Oh, wait...
__________________
For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Two-Time Batting Champ
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Loveland, OH
Posts: 2,641
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
Hanrahan's walk rate jumped through the roof last year. He is likely to get expensive in terms of salary soon, too. I think I would take him for some non-prospects, but my bet is that the Red Sox are already offering something of value for him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,743
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
This is a good time to move Hanrahan, IMO, if I was the Pirates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
All work and no play.....
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,847
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
Hanrahan in for the Reds to close. He replaces Hand. It's a bunt to third. Hanrahan just misses it, but Hannahan picks it up and throws home to Hanigan on the squeeze play.
We need to acquire Hand, Hanrahan, and Tommy Hanson to have a monopoly on Hans.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic. "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Bunn-O-matic
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sugarcreek, Ohio
Posts: 2,705
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
Maybe we get Harang back while we're at it.
__________________
For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 4,323
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
This reminds me of the Spring Training game where almost every players first name started with a J or my desire for the Reds to field a team full of guys with names starting with a Y
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
I love this deal since it almost invariably makes the Pirates a lesser team. Thin out that bullpen and put more demands on the fragile psyche of Jared Hughes. Great plan ... if you're a Reds fan.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,437
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
Quote:
Other than that he's a great guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
Done, it's Hanrahan and Brock Holt for Mark Melancon, Jerry Sands, Stolmy Pimentel, and Ivan DeJesus.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,691
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
Looks like a steal for the Sox.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Ex-tixe
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Just past Mars
Posts: 4,471
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
I wonder if Melancon might return to form away from the mess that was Bobby Valentine.
I don't get them including Brock Holt. Is DeJesus the key?
__________________
At the Edge of the Woods Preview Go to the edge of the cliff and jump off. Build your wings on the way down. --Ray Bradbury |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
The Big Dog
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,691
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
Looks to me like the Sox dealt three fringe major leaguers/AAAA players and a AA question mark for this year's closer. The Pirates were right to deal Hanrahan, but should have been able to do better. Prices are always inflated for these guys at the deadline when there aren't free agents out there for no talent cost. I think this was a miscalculation by Pittsburgh. Should have gotten one more highly regarded guy at the deadline and left the fringe stuff out of it IMO.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,332
|
Re: Red Sox about to aquire Hanrahan?
I doubt it, DeJesus cleared waivers a month ago. I have to think Hanrahan walking the universe in Sept. decreased his trade value.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |