RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-29-2012, 09:24 AM   #901
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by bucksfan2 View Post
Us Cincinnati fans all hate Mike Brown, for a pretty good reason I may add. But I also think there needs to be a point where we start giving the Bengals organization credit. We all say Mike Brown is cheep but he has paid up to keep Zimmer on as the defensive coordinator. When Gruden was hired we laughed saying Brown though he was hiring John and got Jay. He brought in Hue Jackson after his stint as HC in Oakland. Granted they are still a small front office, but one that has gotten bigger lately.

Now to the actual players. Spending top dollar in free agency is a recipe for disaster. For ever J Joseph who becomes a top tier player on another team, there is a Mario Williams who is quiet on his new team. I am not sure of the new collective bargaining agreement, but I think you have to wait to extend draft picks. Green, Dunlap and Adkins MUST be extended and retained. Same can be said about Andre Smith. But there is a question with Michael Johnson, is he a difference maker, or is he going to be like Robert Gathers, a nice complimentary player but nothing special. The last thing you want to do is hand out big extensions to guys who are replaceable.

Time will tell but I like the path the Bengals are on. They do need to open up the pocket books but do that in extending your current stars, not trying to be a player in FA.
Three playoff appearances in four years sounds like a long term trend to me and not just a blind squirrel finding a nut. They're not yet the Steelers or Patriots but they're not the 90s Bengals either.

All this while playing in arguably the toughest division in football. I doubt any division has placed more teams in the playoffs than the AFC North in those 4 yrs
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 12-30-2012, 11:36 AM   #902
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

It'd be nice to get a 10 win season. I agree with not resting starters because it can throw momentum off, it's a risk but so is every week. Oh and I just saw Kyle Cook is starting over Robinson again...maybe there's something he brings that isn't visible to the naked eye, but I can't figure it out.
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 11:58 AM   #903
blumj
Member
 
blumj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,331
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Ray View Post
Three playoff appearances in four years sounds like a long term trend to me and not just a blind squirrel finding a nut. They're not yet the Steelers or Patriots but they're not the 90s Bengals either.

All this while playing in arguably the toughest division in football. I doubt any division has placed more teams in the playoffs than the AFC North in those 4 yrs
No other, 9 in 4 years, although the NFC North might only be one back after today if the Bears or Vikings gets in. The AFC West has had the bare minimum of 4, and even one of those was an 8-8 team. And, for all the NFC East is such a tough division talk we're subjected to every year, they're likely to end up with only 5, just 1 better.
__________________
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
blumj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 01:27 PM   #904
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Johnson reaches double digits in sacks.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 01:35 PM   #905
Boss-Hog
Administrator
 
Boss-Hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 6,007
What's the latest with the Law Firm? They said on TV he pulled his hamstring in warmups, but I couldn't figure out if that's legit or just a nice way of saying he will not play.
Boss-Hog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 03:05 PM   #906
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Burfict all over the field today.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 03:08 PM   #907
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

I think I would rather keep Johnson than Dunlap if it comes down to a choice between the two. I like Johnson's overall game a bit better. With Atkins providing the push we can find another DE to fit the defensive scheme if we lose one to FA.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 03:13 PM   #908
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
I think I would rather keep Johnson than Dunlap if it comes down to a choice between the two. I like Johnson's overall game a bit better. With Atkins providing the push we can find another DE to fit the defensive scheme if we lose one to FA.
Speak of the devil.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 03:58 PM   #909
The Operator
Moderator
 
The Operator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,436
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Carlos Dunlap with the pick-6.

That guy is good.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCubb2003 View Post
Don't worry. I'd say the game threads are about league average.
2013 Reds Record when I attend: 1-2
2012 Reds Record when I attend: 10-7
The Operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 03:59 PM   #910
KoryMac5
Kmac5
 
KoryMac5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Let's not pick between the two, how bout we keep both!
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going.
KoryMac5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 03:59 PM   #911
The Operator
Moderator
 
The Operator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Carlisle, OH
Posts: 2,436
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by KoryMac5 View Post
Let's not pick between the two, how bout we keep both!
I like the way you think.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by BCubb2003 View Post
Don't worry. I'd say the game threads are about league average.
2013 Reds Record when I attend: 1-2
2012 Reds Record when I attend: 10-7
The Operator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 04:14 PM   #912
Ohayou
Member
 
Ohayou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 736
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Looks like we'll be playing the Texans (again) this year, assuming both the Broncos/Patriots win today. I can't complain.
__________________
Choo got it, dude.
Ohayou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 04:16 PM   #913
Redhook
Miami Redhawks
 
Redhook's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

Pretty sweet for the Bengals that Houston just lost. With NE and Denver hopefully winning later today, the Bengals go to Houston. They can beat them.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421

www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips.
Redhook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 04:19 PM   #914
Stray
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,759
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

10-6 with terrible losses to Cleveland, Miami, a game given away to Dallas, and a 4 game losing streak? I'll take it!
Stray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2012, 04:21 PM   #915
RiverRat13
Winning is fun.
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Urbana, OH
Posts: 632
Re: 2012-2013 Bengals Discussion

I think they'll go ahead and take care of a Dalton extension this offseason. He's a statistically average to slightly average QB so I hope his new contract reflects that. After him, my personal priority list to extend:

1. Atkins
2. Green
3. Dunlap
4. Johnson
5. Smith

Atkins and Green are really 1A and 1B but A.J. has two years left on his deal so Geno's new deal takes first priority for me. However, I believe that A.J. gets a new deal this offseason first of the two. I don't think Smith is the worst player on the list, but he's the biggest risk as the potential is still there for him to eat his way out of the league and in today's NFL guys who get to the QB are more valuable than right tackles. I would be ecstatic if all of the guys get new deals but not sure if that is possible even with all of the Bengals' cap space.
RiverRat13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25