RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2013, 08:31 PM   #76
kaldaniels
Viva la Rolen
 
kaldaniels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,327
Re: Chris Dickerson

Quote:
Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
I think so too, but that's exactly what you sign to stash at AAA in case of emergency. Dickerson would be pretty decent insurance. He would have been a much better option last season instead of fooling with Willie Harris, Mike Costanzo and Kris Negron when the need arose. He's probably a better option than Dennis Phipps or Felix Perez and may even prove to be a better option than Xavier Paul if Paul should turn back into a pumpkin at some point in 2013.

While they are at it, they should find a AAAA guy who can play SS as well. The idea of Jason Donald starting at SS for a string of consecutive games if Cozart goes down gives me the heebee jeebees.
Yeah I agree. I wasn't trying to be controversial but when I saw that line from SWB I just couldn't believe what a clear example of a AAAA guy Dickerson is. Sign him and stick him in Louisville, fine by me.
kaldaniels is online now   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 01-05-2013, 09:23 PM   #77
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: Chris Dickerson

Quote:
Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
If Hamilton hits, he's the first choice if somebody goes down. If not, I'm not real fond of any of those other AAA CF options. I'd cut Perez if they need to make a some room. Phipps might be my next choice as is. I'm completely underwhelmed by Ryan Lamarre.
So that would make Dickerson the fourth option, perhaps fifth, depending on whether Bruce is going to play any CF in 2013 (Hamilton, Bruce, Heisey, Choo). That's a lot of injuries at once, and, if I were a wagering guy, Dickerson would know that as well.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 12:14 AM   #78
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,679
Re: Chris Dickerson

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
So that would make Dickerson the fourth option, perhaps fifth, depending on whether Bruce is going to play any CF in 2013 (Hamilton, Bruce, Heisey, Choo). That's a lot of injuries at once, and, if I were a wagering guy, Dickerson would know that as well.
OK, I'll play along. Lets say Choo gets hurt. Heisey moves into CF. Who comes up and takes the bench role while Choo is on he DL? Assume Hamilton hasn't done enough to come up and play every day and you don't want him to come up and sit.

I think it only takes one injury for another AAA OF to be next in line. If you're like me, you still don't want Heisey out there more than 3 or 4 days per week, who plays the other days? Xavier Paul isn't really an option in CF. I seriously doubt that the Reds think Bruce is either.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS
mth123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 02:11 AM   #79
Kc61
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,825
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

The Reds are going to be reluctant to bring Hamilton up as a reserve. I think he will likely play in the minors until September, unless he just destroys AAA and is deemed ready to start in the majors.

Otherwise, Hamilton gets his reps playing everyday at AAA. I don't see him playing part time on the Reds this year.

Ryan Lamarre? Not for a meaningful major league role in 2013. Just not ready for that.

No, CF is a place where an experienced hand at AAA would be welcome. Even if he doesn't play much CF in Louisville, because of Hamilton, a Dickerson, or a Grady Sizemore getting healthy, or a guy like Dewayne Wise could be valuable.
Kc61 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 04:03 AM   #80
Vottomatic
All work and no play.....
 
Vottomatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,780
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
The Reds are going to be reluctant to bring Hamilton up as a reserve. I think he will likely play in the minors until September, unless he just destroys AAA and is deemed ready to start in the majors.

Otherwise, Hamilton gets his reps playing everyday at AAA. I don't see him playing part time on the Reds this year.

Ryan Lamarre? Not for a meaningful major league role in 2013. Just not ready for that.

No, CF is a place where an experienced hand at AAA would be welcome. Even if he doesn't play much CF in Louisville, because of Hamilton, a Dickerson, or a Grady Sizemore getting healthy, or a guy like Dewayne Wise could be valuable.
Agreed.
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic.

"Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread
Vottomatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 08:28 AM   #81
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,679
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
The Reds are going to be reluctant to bring Hamilton up as a reserve. I think he will likely play in the minors until September, unless he just destroys AAA and is deemed ready to start in the majors.

Otherwise, Hamilton gets his reps playing everyday at AAA. I don't see him playing part time on the Reds this year.

Ryan Lamarre? Not for a meaningful major league role in 2013. Just not ready for that.

No, CF is a place where an experienced hand at AAA would be welcome. Even if he doesn't play much CF in Louisville, because of Hamilton, a Dickerson, or a Grady Sizemore getting healthy, or a guy like Dewayne Wise could be valuable.
Exactly, We can say there are 4 or 5 guys for Louisville, but they are Derrick Robinson, Denis Phipps, Felix Perez, Kris Negron maybe Lamarre or Fellhauer. None of those seem like options in Cincy if something goes wrong. Any of those guys is easily pushed aside (or cut loose completely) for a AAAA guy who could be the next guy in for Cincy. The 26th man if you will.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS
mth123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 01:02 AM   #82
REDREAD
Where's my chair?
 
REDREAD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,784
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kc61 View Post
The Reds are going to be reluctant to bring Hamilton up as a reserve. I think he will likely play in the minors until September, unless he just destroys AAA and is deemed ready to start in the majors.
.
I guess it all depends.. Say Choo is out for 2-3 weeks.
I could easily see them calling up Hamilton to fill in.
I mean, it would make more sense than Negron or LaMarre.
2-3 weeks in the majors (even if he is not ready) probably isn't going to damage him.
But yea, ideally we sign a AAAA guy.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013!

Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
REDREAD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 04:52 PM   #83
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,672
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

my wish list was simple. 2 trades, neither of which came to fruition so they were likely not possible. I wanted Tyler Moore from the Nats and Dan Strailey from the A's. The players i was willing to give up were all traded: Stubbs, DiDi et al. Stubbs would have played well in Oakland, certainly his defense would have. Stubbs and DiDi for Strailey would have made me giddy. Leake for Moore. seems feasible. Then use Heisey as a placeholder until Hamilton arrives.

Still I cannot complain about what did happen. I think Moore is better than Ludwick... and I think Moore is wasted in WAS, So i'd love to see a mid season trade.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 05:45 PM   #84
Patrick Bateman
One and a half men
 
Patrick Bateman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 5,456
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Moore is turning 26 and never showed much OBP skills. Big year last year, but have to wonder if he's more AAAA guy.

In a contending year, the known value of Ludwick makes more sense IMO, even at Moore's best he's unlikely to be more than a mild improvement. Having to perhaps give up a big prospect to get him would not have been the best course of action IMO.
Patrick Bateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 05:53 PM   #85
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRF View Post
my wish list was simple. 2 trades, neither of which came to fruition so they were likely not possible. I wanted Tyler Moore from the Nats and Dan Strailey from the A's. The players i was willing to give up were all traded: Stubbs, DiDi et al. Stubbs would have played well in Oakland, certainly his defense would have. Stubbs and DiDi for Strailey would have made me giddy. Leake for Moore. seems feasible. Then use Heisey as a placeholder until Hamilton arrives.

Still I cannot complain about what did happen. I think Moore is better than Ludwick... and I think Moore is wasted in WAS, So i'd love to see a mid season trade.
Hey TRF, nice to see ya
westofyou is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 07:15 PM   #86
757690
Hoping to be 75769013
 
757690's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,095
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
Exactly, We can say there are 4 or 5 guys for Louisville, but they are Derrick Robinson, Denis Phipps, Felix Perez, Kris Negron maybe Lamarre or Fellhauer. None of those seem like options in Cincy if something goes wrong. Any of those guys is easily pushed aside (or cut loose completely) for a AAAA guy who could be the next guy in for Cincy. The 26th man if you will.
Stubbs went down for awhile last season and was replaced without an issue by Heisey, Valdez and Negron. As long as there is someone on the team that can cover CF defensively, I'm comfortable. All those guys at Louisville will do that.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein
757690 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 11:25 PM   #87
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,679
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
Stubbs went down for awhile last season and was replaced without an issue by Heisey, Valdez and Negron. As long as there is someone on the team that can cover CF defensively, I'm comfortable. All those guys at Louisville will do that.
Stubbs going down improved the line-up. If Choo goes down it will hurt. I want some one who could platoon with Heisey to hopefully avoid long stretches of out making. None of those other options qualify.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS
mth123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 11:37 PM   #88
Plus Plus
Red Ox Dynasty
 
Plus Plus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 1,300
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
Hey TRF, nice to see ya
I agree- nice to see you TRF!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
Thus his team was punished

Long live punishment
Plus Plus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 09:21 AM   #89
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,672
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofyou View Post
Hey TRF, nice to see ya
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plus Plus View Post
I agree- nice to see you TRF!
a year away from all social networking. no... anything. except the redszone dynasty league. it was refreshing and difficult, especially with the reds doing so well.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2013, 09:31 AM   #90
TRF
Vavasor
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Amarillo, TX
Posts: 12,672
Re: Are the Reds done dealing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick Bateman View Post
Moore is turning 26 and never showed much OBP skills. Big year last year, but have to wonder if he's more AAAA guy.

In a contending year, the known value of Ludwick makes more sense IMO, even at Moore's best he's unlikely to be more than a mild improvement. Having to perhaps give up a big prospect to get him would not have been the best course of action IMO.
agree to disagree. He's 26 this year, entering his prime years. prior to last year he had back to back 31 HR seasons. he's younger and likely to stay healthy and cheap. The opposite of Ludwick. Ludwick isn't exactly a known quantity. What is known is he had a very good bounce back year. What isn't know is his ability to sustain that success as he's got no real track record of doing that, not even in STL. Moore is a better value IMO, but it's moot as the Reds didn't even sniff to see if he was available. Ludwick's breakout season came at age 29. Moore's rookie year at age 25 was better than any Ludwick season prior to age 29. In 104 games last year, 29 AAA, 75 MLB he hit 19 HR's, 9 at AAA. Dude has monster power. I hope that with all the guys the Nats have brought in plus four of their top 10 prospects being OF's they see he is expendable and let him go.
__________________
"don't end up with a grandson with a dog collar."
TRF is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
fa signing, jocketty, spring training, trade

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25