RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > RedsZone > The Old Red Guard

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2013, 09:18 AM   #16
klw
Member
 
klw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 4,283
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by cincrazy View Post
However, they were 10-5 against the Astros. They didn't own them anymore than you'd expect to own a bad team. I'm not saying it won't play a factor in their win total, maybe a few games, but you don't buy into them for that reason? That's the only reason you give? Just silly to me.
It could be that the evaluation could have been deeper than that but Olney found that to be the best line to use.
klw is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 01-06-2013, 10:21 AM   #17
jojo
Five Tool Fool
 
jojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,545
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by klw View Post
It could be that the evaluation could have been deeper than that but Olney found that to be the best line to use.
And the context could've been "world series favorites" which is a much, much higher bar than "legitimately good".
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
jojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 01:24 PM   #18
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,660
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedLegsToday View Post
vs Cubs/Astros in '12

Reds 22-9
Cards 21-11
Brewers 22-12
Pirates 20-13

Not seeing the Reds huge advantage. It's the Brewers fault they only went 9-8 against the 'Stros!
The advantage lost comes more into play if they finish second and are vying for the wild card. They don't have that now.

I'm fairly optimistic and have them down for 96 wins with the talent on the roster.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS
mth123 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 01:31 PM   #19
OldXOhio
I thought you'd be bigger
 
OldXOhio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Green Country
Posts: 2,631
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

This is a Buster Olney column? Yeah, you lost me there. Who cares whether or not the AL evaluator attaches his name.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nate
Chapman can be downright pornographic at times.
OldXOhio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 02:21 PM   #20
Blitz Dorsey
Party like it's 1990
 
Blitz Dorsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 4,309
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strikes Out Looking View Post
Are the Cardinals not playing the Astros 18 times either?
Exactly.

Blitz Dorsey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 04:44 PM   #21
RedEye
Ojo Rojo
 
RedEye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 4,393
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Is anyone else tired of the "drinking the Kool-Aid" expression? I actually find it kind of weird when EVERYTHING becomes a comparison to something like Jonestown. Just wondering.
__________________
"It's a dog-eat-dog world and I'm wearing milkbone underwear." - Norm (George Wendt), Cheers
RedEye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 05:08 PM   #22
OldXOhio
I thought you'd be bigger
 
OldXOhio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Green Country
Posts: 2,631
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedEye View Post
Is anyone else tired of the "drinking the Kool-Aid" expression? I actually find it kind of weird when EVERYTHING becomes a comparison to something like Jonestown. Just wondering.
Yep. Almost as tired as "getting the band back together".
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by nate
Chapman can be downright pornographic at times.
OldXOhio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 05:29 PM   #23
MrRedLegger
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 435
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Losing the Astros might implicate that we won't get 97 wins. In no way does that have any effect on who wins the NL Central. This guy is an idiot.
__________________
There are only two seasons - Winter and Baseball.
MrRedLegger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 05:53 PM   #24
mth123
The Big Dog
 
mth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,660
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRedLegger View Post
Losing the Astros might implicate that we won't get 97 wins. In no way does that have any effect on who wins the NL Central. This guy is an idiot.
OTOH, the Cards did have a better run differential than the Reds in 2012. If that holds and a little luck goes the other way (not to mention the much superior help that the cards could be getting from their system in 2013), the Cards could take the central and push the Reds into the wildcard race. At that point the loss of all those games against the astros could become very important.

I think the changes the Reds have made makes them the favorite in the central, but lambasting the article seems off to me.
__________________
"All I can tell them is pick a good one and sock it." --BABE RUTH

Having better players makes "the right time" or "the big hit" happen a lot more often. PLUS PLUS

Last edited by mth123; 01-06-2013 at 06:20 PM.
mth123 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 06:00 PM   #25
BCubb2003
Haunted by walks
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 6,294
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedEye View Post
Is anyone else tired of the "drinking the Kool-Aid" expression? I actually find it kind of weird when EVERYTHING becomes a comparison to something like Jonestown. Just wondering.
Yes. And it wasn't even Kool-Aid.
BCubb2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 06:02 PM   #26
Scrap Irony
Member
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
I think the changes the Reds have made makes them the favorite in the central, but lambasting the article seems off to me.
They're lambasting the article because it's illogical.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat."
-- Christy Matthewson
"Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot."
-- Leo Durocher
Scrap Irony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 06:15 PM   #27
MrRedLegger
Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 435
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
They're lambasting the article because it's illogical.
There is always concern for not taking the division again (see 2011), but for the reasons the author listed, it just seems like poor judgement.

The entire division doesn't play the Astros now, and we have addressed our run differential issue by getting a high OBP leadoff hitter who will hit in front of a .270 hitter and two spots in front of the .300+ BA doubles machine.
__________________
There are only two seasons - Winter and Baseball.
MrRedLegger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2013, 06:41 PM   #28
757690
Hoping to be 75769013
 
757690's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Dayton
Posts: 6,078
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRedLegger View Post
There is always concern for not taking the division again (see 2011), but for the reasons the author listed, it just seems like poor judgement.

The entire division doesn't play the Astros now, and we have addressed our run differential issue by getting a high OBP leadoff hitter who will hit in front of a .270 hitter and two spots in front of the .300+ BA doubles machine.
This exemplifies why using run differential from season to season is very problematic. Teams change their rosters in the off-season, players get older, rookies and young players break through, and some players fall off in terms of production. And that doesn't even take in account injuries.

I really think we will discover that the Pythag will become less and less useful as we move forward with understanding the game.
__________________
We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them. - Albert Einstein
757690 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 07:55 AM   #29
MikeThierry
Member
 
MikeThierry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,108
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

The only thing I will give the Reds on luck last year is that no starting pitcher was injured. Otherwise to attribute the Reds success on the Astros or contribute future success based on not playing the Astros is silly. I think what will affect the Reds more than not playing the Astros this year is regressing to the means on the injury front to starters in their rotation.
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.”

“I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter

Mike Shannon
MikeThierry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 08:39 AM   #30
mdccclxix
Member
 
mdccclxix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,652
Re: AL evaluator critique of the Reds

The Reds had the 3rd best winning percentage vs teams at or over .500, but also had 7 more wins than anyone else vs teams under .500.
mdccclxix is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25