RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2013, 09:56 PM   #766
WMR
GR8NESS
 
WMR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Roll Tide. One of the few teams whose defense I enjoy watching more than their offense.

Notre Dame is being completely manhandled.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrap Irony View Post
Calipari is not, nor has he ever been accused or "caught", cheating. He himself turned in one of his players (Camby) for dealing with an agent to get one Final Four overturned. The other is all on the NCAA and Rose. (IF Rose cheated.)

WMR is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 01-07-2013, 10:10 PM   #767
jojo
Five Tool Fool
 
jojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 16,545
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by WMR View Post
Roll Tide. One of the few teams whose defense I enjoy watching more than their offense.

Notre Dame is being completely manhandled.
Hopefully Bama fans can avoid embarrassing both themselves and the university that they never actually attended this year.
__________________
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
jojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 10:11 PM   #768
Boston Red
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Braintree, MA
Posts: 1,945
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

It's unfortunate Notre Dame is so disinterested.
Boston Red is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 10:22 PM   #769
19braves77
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 361
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Dear Irish,

The SEC isn't like the BIG 10 or a service academy.
__________________
http://diamondvisits.blogspot.com/ My Minor League stadium review site.
19braves77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2013, 10:31 PM   #770
Reds4Life
Member
 
Reds4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,918
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

ND got exposed big time, they look flat out inept. This game is a complete annihilation by Alabama.
__________________
Pessimists are well informed optimists
Reds4Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 12:07 AM   #771
Slyder
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,061
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reds4Life View Post
ND got exposed big time, they look flat out inept. This game is a complete annihilation by Alabama.
Second straight year the system failed the eye test IMO. Last year should have been LSU vs Ok State. This year Oregon vs Alabama would have been the best game.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by moewan View Post
Barmaid to patron "Sir you are slurring, I am going to have to cut you off"

Patron to barmaid "I'm not slurring, I'm speaking in cursive"

Slyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 01:00 AM   #772
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,659
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyder View Post
Second straight year the system failed the eye test IMO. Last year should have been LSU vs Ok State. This year Oregon vs Alabama would have been the best game.
You mean LSU who got dominated last year? The same LSU who despite winning at Alabama, to my eyes, looked like the clear lesser team on the field that day?
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 01:08 AM   #773
Slyder
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,061
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
You mean LSU who got dominated last year? The same LSU who despite winning at Alabama, to my eyes, looked like the clear lesser team on the field that day?
You mean the team that WON AT TUSCALOOSA, played the toughest schedule in football last year? Yep still believe that you rewarded a team for not playing a 13th game. I dont care how the bowl game looked. Bama lost to LSU and should have been behind every 1 loss team because of it. And yes if WVU had been in that position my position would have been the same. WVU and Bama both had their chance during the regular season against LSU, it should have been someone else. Plus it would have meant an opportunity to see whether Alabama or LSU could have done against something different in Oregon and OK State respectively.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by moewan View Post
Barmaid to patron "Sir you are slurring, I am going to have to cut you off"

Patron to barmaid "I'm not slurring, I'm speaking in cursive"

Slyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 03:00 AM   #774
dabvu2498
Yay!
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Middletown, Ohio
Posts: 7,260
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slyder View Post
You mean the team that WON AT TUSCALOOSA, played the toughest schedule in football last year? Yep still believe that you rewarded a team for not playing a 13th game. I dont care how the bowl game looked. Bama lost to LSU and should have been behind every 1 loss team because of it. And yes if WVU had been in that position my position would have been the same. WVU and Bama both had their chance during the regular season against LSU, it should have been someone else. Plus it would have meant an opportunity to see whether Alabama or LSU could have done against something different in Oregon and OK State respectively.
Problem is, the "most deserving" assertion doesn't hold up this year. Those were fairly clearly the most deserving 2 teams based on the regular season this year.
__________________
When all is said and done more is said than done.
dabvu2498 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 04:43 AM   #775
GAC
What Me Worry?
 
GAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,416
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Talk about shredding an opponent and spitting them out! Geez!

Did anyone honestly think ND was going to have a chance in this game? I didn't. They should have lost to Pitt, and barely escaped Purdue.

Not only did Alabama have experience on their side ... this was their 3rd NC game in the last 4 years... but I believed 'Bama's O-line and running game would utterly take any fight out of the Irish.

I laughed at one post-game commentator who said the only time McCarron got touched in the entire game was in the 4th quarter by HIS OWN PLAYER when McCarron barked at Jones after a delay penalty and Jones shoved him away. LOL

Just because someone goes undefeated, IMO, doesn't mean they deserve to be in the NC. The system is still flawed badly IMO.

All I know is I'll be collecting on a few bets at work today. I even gave a couple guys 14 pts. LOL
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations
GAC is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 05:51 AM   #776
19braves77
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 361
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

I kinda think Brian Kelly overachived this year and that might come back to bite him in the butt if expecations are too high next year.

Saban could leave for Dallas today and I honestly wouldnt be upset. Wish we could buy out the Virginia Tech game next this year with the promise we will visit them in 2016 at their place and schedule either Oregon, Ohio State, or Boise State in Atlanta to open the season. Its time to give their fan base some reality.
__________________
http://diamondvisits.blogspot.com/ My Minor League stadium review site.
19braves77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 05:56 AM   #777
RedsBaron
Big Red Machine
 
RedsBaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Out Wayne
Posts: 22,365
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

My favorite line from the game was someone tweeted that A.J. McCarron's girlfriend, Katherine Webb, was seeking a restraining order against Brent Musberger. Man, did Musberger go on about her (she is attractive).
__________________
"Hey...Dad. Wanna Have A Catch?" Kevin Costner in "Field Of Dreams."
RedsBaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 07:56 AM   #778
cumberlandreds
Member
 
cumberlandreds's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Sterling VA
Posts: 7,826
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

This game just further proved its the SEC and everyone else. Seven straight BCS titles for the league. Also Bama is as dominant now as they were in the Bear Bryant days. I thought it would be a close game with Bama winning. But they showed they were light years ahead of ND. I'm just glad Ohio State was on probation or we would have had either them or ND as national champions today. Certainly wouldn't have been a true representation of the best team in the nation.
__________________
Reds Fan Since 1971
cumberlandreds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 09:05 AM   #779
Sea Ray
Member
 
Sea Ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,252
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by cumberlandreds View Post
This game just further proved its the SEC and everyone else. Seven straight BCS titles for the league. Also Bama is as dominant now as they were in the Bear Bryant days. I thought it would be a close game with Bama winning. But they showed they were light years ahead of ND. I'm just glad Ohio State was on probation or we would have had either them or ND as national champions today. Certainly wouldn't have been a true representation of the best team in the nation.
It certainly did and OK, this game didn't match up the two best teams but it wasn't Oregon who should have been there. Texas A&M looked to be the team with the best shot at defeating Bama. But the folks are weary of SEC dominance and that wouldn't have gone over well. I've been aware of the strength of SEC football for a long time and even I'm amazed at the dominance of 7 straight titles; almost all of which were blowouts
Sea Ray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2013, 11:13 AM   #780
bucksfan2
Waitin til next year
 
bucksfan2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 9,610
Re: SEC Football Discussion Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by cumberlandreds View Post
This game just further proved its the SEC and everyone else. Seven straight BCS titles for the league. Also Bama is as dominant now as they were in the Bear Bryant days. I thought it would be a close game with Bama winning. But they showed they were light years ahead of ND. I'm just glad Ohio State was on probation or we would have had either them or ND as national champions today. Certainly wouldn't have been a true representation of the best team in the nation.
Texas A&M was the only team to beat Alabama. They are an SEC team in name only, a Big 12 team that beat Alabama.

The SEC has been good, but Alabama has been the dominant one. With the exception of Alabama, I think the other top tier teams in college can play with the likes of LSU, Florida, and Georgia.

I never thought ND had a chance in beating Alabama, and as the bowl season wore done it became apparent that the teams that ND beat showed that they weren't up to snuff in their bowl games. With the exception of Stanford (who ND got by because of an awful call) all the teams that ND beat were overrated. Its kinda ironic because the team that I thought could have played with Alabama is Stanford.
bucksfan2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25