![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,530
|
News on Scott Rolen
Quote:
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 260
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
Hate to break it to him, but I think that ship has sailed
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I don't want to grow up
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northern Indiana
Posts: 530
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
heck it's in another port somewhere over the horizon
__________________
The older I get - the better I was and yes - I hate the Cardinals (Reds fan since 1958) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 51
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
His talent has diminished for sure but the Reds always seemed to play better with him in the lineup. I would love to keep him as a bench guy. His dugout presence is an asset in any role.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 114
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
I can't see with the moves that have been made that he is coming back. If he does it will surely be in seriously reduced role.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 202
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
Would love to have Rolen back. He brings intangibles to the dugout and locker room.
My concern is whether Dusty can be saved from himself. If Rolen is on the roster, does that also mean he's on the field as the first choice? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Columbus
Posts: 709
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
I like Rolen, and when the season ended was hoping he'd come back if for nothing else than his leadership. But now I'm questioning his motiviation. If he's struggling with the decision one of two things must be true:
- He's not sure he really WANTS to play ball. - He WANTS to, but is not sure he's phisically able. Neither of these things look good to me. Any coaching positions open?
__________________
Sto Pro Veritate |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 260
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
I worry a bit about how this thing is going to end. He has to know his replacement was signed in Jack Hannahan while his status was, and continues to be, in limbo. Now he's coming out and saying the Reds are his top choice if he returns. If he does sign elsewhere, is he going to play the "Reds didn't want me" card?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 56
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
It would be nice to have Scott as a bench guy, but I don't know if he would ever go for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 160
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
gotta wonder how much he'd want too...great clubhouse guy or not, he's no longer a top half of the league 3B in the field or lineup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Redleger13
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 84
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
I'd love to have him back. But only on one condition: as a bench coach.
__________________
Mr. Redlegs - 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: NC Coast
Posts: 68
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
If I were Rolen, I'd probably be thinking about how to enjoy my money and time and fame and family.
BUT if the Dodgers really, really want to pay me $5million to give it another shot, then what the heck. Maybe I'll just put it up to pay for all my grandkids schooling one day or maybe I buy all of Jasper some sweet Beats headphones... |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 61
|
Re: News on Scott Rolen
Scott is one of my favorite Reds of all time, but I think it is time to move on. His fielding percentage was the lowest of his career last year. He had 10 errors last year alone in only 87 games. He obviously does not move around at 3rd like he did even a few years ago. He had already been declining at the plate for years, but his sharp decline in the field shows it is time. I would love to have him back as a coach, but at this point he is not a great option to have unless he AND DUSTY know he is back strictly as a bench player.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |