![]() |
|
|
#166 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 2,133
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
I'm not a big fan of moving Zimmer to the HC position. I just feel he'll flop as a head coach. Dick LeBeau version 2.0. Even though Gruden had a poor 2nd half of the season as O-Coordinator, I still believe he'll make a good head coach in the future.
__________________
That hit was plenty fair. Atleast by a quarter of an inch. -Steve Stone |
|
|
|
|
|
#167 | |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
I just hope they don't lose him. He's been great for them.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
I think Zimmer has proven himself enough to get a shot somewhere. Bengals were awful on D for yrs before he came in and turned things around. I now think the D is one of our best strengths on the team. Lebeau was a good DC that flopped in an awful situation, I don't think Lomabardi would have won with those Bengal teams. I am all for the move but no way Mike Brown ever gets a GM when he basically has Marvin doing both coaching duties and some GM responsibilities as well.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#169 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#170 |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
Why though? Does anyone know?
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
#171 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#172 |
|
Miami Redhawks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincy
Posts: 2,247
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
Gotcha, thanks. Guessing Cleveland and some of the other teams didn't like hearing the truth.
__________________
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421 www.kylevoska.com - Golfer? Check out my blog for golf tips. |
|
|
|
|
|
#173 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
Zimmer is brutally honest with teams during the interview process, which turns some GM's and owners off. Case in point Miami where he had a really good situation lined up with Ireland who he worked with in Dallas. Zimmer lost that job after meeting with ownership who felt Philbin was a little less abrasive. Too bad too, guy would be a heck of a coach.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#174 |
|
Viva la Rolen
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,324
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
The fact that the league is riding an offensive wave doesn't help either.
Teams want points, points, points. They aren't as focused on preventing points, points, points. As a Browns fan I have to go on record not liking the "I guess Cleveland didn't like hearing the truth." remark. I disagree. I believe they just fell in love with Chud after his interview. The Browns were one of the few teams that even gave Zimmer an interview despite his reputation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#175 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
What about signing Tebow as a fullback?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#176 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 15,254
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
|
|
|
|
|
|
#177 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 9,534
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
Quote:
__________________
Let's hang a Championship Banner this year!!!!! |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#178 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
Marvin says Bengals want Rey Maualuga back, and will make an effort to sign him. Speculation is that Burfict will move to the middle, while Rey heads over to strong side LB spot he played for two seasons.
I actually am OK with this move if we can get him on a cheap deal. Rey was pretty good his first couple of seasons at strong side.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
|
|
#179 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,727
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
How do you guys feel about the draft? What positions will be looking at in the first 3 rounds? Any players that might drop to us?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#180 |
|
Kmac5
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Waterloo, NY
Posts: 3,661
|
Re: 2013 Bengals Discussion
I think Zimmer feels he is a safety away from being one of the elite defenses in the league. I would say they lean safety in the first if there is one left at 21. In the second I could see hitting on a RB and LB, and shoring up the line in the third with a tackle. However you never know with the Bengals, they follow the Baltimore model of always drafting BPA, so you never know.
__________________
If you have a losing record at Reds games, please stop going. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |