![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Worthington, O-H-I-O
Posts: 114
|
TOPPS disses Rose
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Stat Wanker Hodiernus
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 14,907
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
As I've said many times else. I HATE revisionist history. Acting like something didn't happen neither honors the game nor educates the fans.
__________________
Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance. |
|
|
|
| Likes: | Number_Fourteen (02-13-2013), Scrap Irony (02-13-2013) |
|
|
#4 |
|
Ex-tixe
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Just past Mars
Posts: 4,466
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
I didn't realize that Topps had the authority to do this.
Can someone explain which of Rose's hits became illegitimate because he bet on baseball?
__________________
At the Edge of the Woods Preview Go to the edge of the cliff and jump off. Build your wings on the way down. --Ray Bradbury |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Beer is good!!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,116
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
I am about as far as you can get from being a Pete Rose kool aid drinker but thats just stupid.
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,631
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
I like the logic used to reach the decision--simple and plain and simple. In other words, I just decided it was right, so it was right.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
| Likes: | Screwball (02-14-2013) |
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cincy
Posts: 351
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
As westofyou said, this is so obviously an orchestrated move to manufacture a controversy and get people to talk about baseball cards for the first time since 1986.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Beer is good!!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,116
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
Yea but I think it will back fire. In the court of public opinion Pete is still loved by the fans so I can see a backlash where fans wont buy Topps cards as a form of protest.
__________________
"Boys, I'm one of those umpires that misses 'em every once in a while so if it's close, you'd better hit it." Cal Hubbard |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Miami township
Posts: 518
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
Agreed! I have grown weary of even hearing his name, but this is idiotic!
__________________
"Why are those Dodger pitchers in the Reds bullpen?"-GAC August 28, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,671
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
I dislike Pete Rose for many, many things, but this makes zero sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Big Red Machine
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Out Wayne
Posts: 22,365
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
"You can't fix stupid"-Ron White.
To be consistent, Topps should announce that Ty Cobb will no longer be listed as having the highest career batting average because he was a racist and a really mean guy, so the honor of having the highest career batting average will go to Rogers Hornsby.....er, wait, Hornsby may have also been a bigot and he certainly was by all accounts a self-centered jerk, so the career batting average leader is now Shoeless Joe Jackson....er, wait, "Black Sox" you say.....hmmmm.....
__________________
"Hey...Dad. Wanna Have A Catch?" Kevin Costner in "Field Of Dreams." |
|
|
|
| Likes: |
|
|
#12 |
|
thirsty and miserable
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ/NY
Posts: 5,383
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
Have we gotten a response from Pete yet? Is he on Twitter? I feel like sooner or later he's just going to turn into The Iron Sheik and begin saying things like "F-- the no good Topps!"
__________________
"Since I've been with the Reds in 1989, we've never had a farm system this loaded," Bowden said. "If we were the New York Yankees and had unlimited dollars, we could have traded for Colon, (Jeff) Weaver, Rolen, (Cliff) Floyd, (Kenny) Rogers and Finley and gotten them all -- and still held onto our top five prospects. That's an amazing statement." |
|
|
|
| Likes: | Chip R (02-13-2013), Number_Fourteen (02-13-2013) |
|
|
#13 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
I heart manufactured controversy.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Big League Choo!
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: The 513
Posts: 2,157
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
No ... Topps did not diss Pete Rose.
http://www.beckett.com/news/2013/02/...its-mlbs-call/ Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: TOPPS disses Rose
They let Rose be part of the All-Century Team, on-field at an MLB-sanctioned event (ASG). I think one e-mail to MLB would have cleared the issue of putting his name (not his image, not his likeness, but the 8 letters that spell out his name) on a card.
Though, it's not like they've been particularly troubled by the issue of putting Rose's name on cards in the past (2006 Topps): ![]() It's such a non-issue, though. I wouldn't be surprised to learn Topps was behind the "outrage" that started it as part of a viral marketing campaign to get people talking about baseball cards.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... Last edited by Caveat Emperor; 02-13-2013 at 04:25 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |