![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,412
|
Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
Interesting quote in Hal McCoy's recent story:
"Agent, Scott Boras was in camp to witness Choo’s press conference with the Korean media after Choo signed a one-year $7.1 million deal with the Reds. How about the future? Boras said Reds general manager Walt Jocketty expressed interest in talking about a long term deal. “Walt told me Choo is the type of player he would like to talk about for the long term, but he wants to focus on this year first and we can talk about it after this season,” said Boras." Story here: http://www.daytondailynews.com/blogs...medium=twitter -Matt |
|
|
|
| Likes: | OnBaseMachine (02-15-2013) |
|
|
#2 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,144
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
I'd be all for Choo in LF long term.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,412
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
Same here. Move Ludwick to PH/bench role in 2014.
Have an OF of: Choo, Hamilton, Bruce for 4-6 years would be AWESOME. -Matt |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Vampire Weekend @Bernie's
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 11,311
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
Allow me to attempt to paraphrase ...
"If Choo does well and Hamilton has trouble in AAA, we'd love to have him back if the price is right." -Walt Jocketty
__________________
Get MLBtraderumors Reds updates on Facebook. http://www.facebook.com/pages/Reds-R...33794710005587 http://i.imgur.com/1bCKpaH.jpg |
|
|
|
| Likes: | mth123 (02-16-2013), TheBigLebowski (02-16-2013) |
|
|
#5 |
|
Retro-Gamer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,646
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
As the old joke goes
How do you know Scott Boras is lying? His lips are moving |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,468
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
That's my thinking. Ideally, Ludwick shows no signs of slowing down and Hamilton demolishes AAA, but things don't always work out right. Especially if Ludwick scuffles, locking up Choo becomes a priority IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,732
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
I actually don't think this is the reasoning. I believe the reasoning is he will be a fit for LF because he doesn't think Ludwick will be as good as he was last year. We have no in-house options, so of course we'd like to speak to your client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,124
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
I don't care how Ludwick performs. If the Reds have a chance to lock up Choo to play LF for the next five years, I'd be all for that. Ludwick is a nice placeholder for LF, but Choo is the kind of guy you build around. Choo is better than Ludwick at every facet of the game.
|
|
|
|
| Likes: | AtomicDumpling (02-15-2013), RedEye (02-15-2013), reds44 (02-19-2013), remdog (02-15-2013), savafan (02-16-2013) |
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,124
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
Quote:
Choo is one of the best offensive players in the game AND plays quality defense in an OF corner. If the Reds can hold onto him and Hamilton pans out in CF, the Reds are set in the OF for the foreseeable future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Peekskill,NY
Posts: 112
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
A possible 2014 batting order of:
Hamilton CF Choo LF Phillips 2B Votto 1B Frazier 3B Bruce RF Hannigan C Cozart SS Pitcher Could cause a lot of anxiety for opposing pitchers! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playoff Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Liberty Township, OH
Posts: 235
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
I 'd love this.
Hamilton CF Choo LF Votto 1B Phillips 2B Bruce RF Frazier 3B Cozart SS Hannigan C Pitcher |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
All work and no play.....
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lebanon
Posts: 6,978
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
I'd love this:
CF Hamilton 2B Phillips 1B Votto LF Stanton RF Bruce 3B Frazier SS Cozart C Hanigan
__________________
"I can't take this homerism anymore." - 10xWSChamps, August 11, 2010. A Cardinals fan having a problem with all the homerism on Redszone. Classic. "Man do I miss the days where were didn't need a calculator and an encyclopedia of baseball metrics to enjoy a baseball game ... - MikeS21" - 8/2/12 game thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Lexington, KY
Posts: 457
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
I think Cupid lives in the Reds' clubhouse. And his latest target was Choo, probably yesterday. It's the only reasonable explanation for all players falling in love with the team.
__________________
There are only two seasons - Winter and Baseball. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,468
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
I'd love to have him, but how many long term deals can we bear? I don't know the finances obviously, but we've got so much fixed money now that it has to be a priority to fill certain positions on the cheap. I think if Ludwick has another good, healthy year and Hamilton appears to be a viable centerfielder for 2014, we'll cross the bridge of filling left field two years from now.
Last edited by Superdude; 02-15-2013 at 07:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Shelburne Falls, MA
Posts: 9,579
|
Re: Choo long-term? Might be a possibility...
Pure Jocketty. Would love this move.
__________________
"Baseball is a very, very complex business. It's more of a people business than most businesses." - Bob Castellini |
|
|
|
| Likes: | jmac (02-16-2013), OnBaseMachine (02-15-2013) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |