![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Latest Vanity Fair Cover
Photo not safe for work by the way.
http://www.wwtdd.com/images/vf.jpg Can they do that on a regular issue magazine? Scarlett Johanson and Keira Knightley
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Habitual Line Stepper
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: VA
Posts: 350
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
I have nothing but positive things to say about this post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
post hype sleeper
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Denver
Posts: 10,350
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
Scarlett's butt isn't shown on the newsstand. It's beyond the fold of the page.
__________________
On Dasher On Dancer On Prancer Ondrusek |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
Apparently Rachel McAdams was supposed to be on the cover as well.
http://www.radaronline.com/fresh-int...#report_004845 We hear flesh-obsessed designer Tom Ford’s gig as guest editor of Vanity Fair’s Hollywood Issue recently hit a kink. Sources close to the glossy say demure rising starlet Rachel McAdams stormed out of a November cover shoot for the annual industry mash note—and fired her publicist—after learning Ford expected her to pose nude. According to mag insiders, Ford had prearranged with McAdam’s rep, Wolf Kasteller’s Ame Van Iden, for the in-demand Red Eye actress to appear naked in a group portrait of Hollywood’s breathtaking beauties-of-the-moment, alongside Keira Knightley, Scarlett Johansson, and others. (We presume the shoot was conceived along the tasteful lines of Herb Ritts’ iconic 1989 supermodel ensemble, “Stephanie Cindy Christy Tatjana Naomi”, but considering Ford’s involvement it’s possible to imagine a raunchier scenario.) Unfortunately for legions of mouth-breathing McAdams fans, we’re told Van Iden neglected to brief her family-friendly charge—who may have been the only actress in Wedding Crashers to keep all her clothes on—about the concept beforehand. When she arrived on the L.A. set and found out what Ford had in mind, we’re told she turned tail and promptly fired Van Iden. “Every magazine wants her on their cover and thinks she’s gonna be huge, so she can get away with being picky,” says a Condé Nast insider. “But everyone’s really impressed that she stood up for herself. It’s kind of amazing, actually.” While the 29-year-old actress’s chaste retreat suggests she has a tad more dignity than the average Hollywood climber, it’s odd she was so blindsided by Ford’s request. After all, the former Gucci designer has previously told reporters the “entire issue would be naked,” and his recent work has certainly showcased his fondness for letting it all hang out—he posed au naturel for a 22-page spread in last month’s W, his new line of cosmetics for Estee Lauder is called Amber Nude, his ad campaign for the fragrance Youth Dew features a naked Carolyn Murphy, and an advertisement he produced for a new line of sunglasses reportedly features porn stars whom he says were paid “to have sex on set.” Neither Ford nor VF spokeswoman Beth Kseniak returned calls about the incident. McAdam’s manager, Shelley Browning, confirmed that McAdams “presently does not have a publicist,” but referred questions about the cover shoot to the magazine. Van Iden herself did not return calls.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Baseball card addict
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Piqua
Posts: 4,426
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
wow...i've...uh...i've forgotten everything in the world.
and i feel fine |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Tired of talk. Win!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 8,122
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
Oh fine, make me wait til I get home to see it.
__________________
Championships for MY teams in my lifetime: Cincinnati Reds - 75, 76, 90 Chicago Blackhawks - 10 University of Kentucky - 78, 96, 98, 12 Cincinnati Bengals - None Chicago Bulls - 91, 92, 93, 96, 97, 98 |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,342
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
They look icky
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
breath
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,337
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
Someone get them to the beach... they need a touch of color.
Last edited by westofyou; 02-08-2006 at 12:10 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,129
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
Kiera Knightley is outstanding -- until she opens her mouth and starts talking.
She makes Brittney Spears look like a MENSA candidate.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Plays The Right Way
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: 796.357
Posts: 1,676
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
giggity-giggity-giggity.........
__________________
. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
Quote:
Best post ever.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
This Tom Ford guy has a strange obsession with buttcrack
http://www.postchronicle.com/news/en..._2126019.shtml by Mitch Marconi Feb 8, 2006 Former Gucci and Yves St. Laurent designer Tom Ford reportedly fought with Vanity Fair editors over Angelina Jolie's naked rear-end - after persuading Brad Pitt's girlfriend to disrobe for an Annie Liebovitz Hollywood stars layout. Ford reportedly accepted the role of guest artistic director for the upcoming issue and reportedly began encouraging/soliciting his famous friends to strip for the photo shoot. "A lot of women actually, a couple of men, too, wanted to take their clothes off. These are such beautiful people, beautiful women, and who doesn't want to see a bit of them." However, Ford was upset when he realized the editors were trying to cover up Angelina Jolie's naked buttocks. He reveals, "The picture kept getting cropped and I finally had to stick a Post-It on it in the planning room: 'Do not touch, leave Angelina's buttcrack.'" I don't know about you 'butt' [pun intended] I'm sure glad Tom had the balls to demand what's right. Angelina Jolie has one of the finest dumpers on the planet and I thank God for good men like Tom Ford who are looking out for us all. Brad Pitt is one lucky man.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Churlish
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 13,664
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
Quote:
Not that I'm complaining...
__________________
"I prefer books and movies where the conflict isn't of the extreme cannibal apocalypse variety I guess." Redsfaithful |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Making sense of it all
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,130
|
Re: Latest Vanity Fair Cover
"I think it moved..."
-George Costanza
__________________
An excited shade of Red
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |