![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
This one's for you Edd
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton Area
Posts: 8,471
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Maybe we can trade Russell Branyan back to Cleveland...
I'm in favor of Broussard. Can't be worse than what's out there now. I'm becoming more at peace with Tony Womack at 2nd. The reason is that there is no way he can last past May 1.
__________________
Some people play baseball. Baseball plays Jay Bruce. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
I'm not thrilled with Hatteberg at 1st, but we have not had a dominant first baseman in some time. I loved Casey, he was my favorite Red, but he was just an average player who hit for average. He worked hard on defense, but was never great. Could Aurilla be an everyday 1st baseman? His bat is better and I have a much easier time seeing him on an every day basis.
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Quote:
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
SSG, Red Army Choir
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Santa Fe, New Mexico
Posts: 1,119
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Why not trade the Tribe Womack for Broussard?
Broussard's streaky and hardly a panacea at 1B, but nominally an improvement over Hatteberg, offering better defense and more clout (.464 SLG in 2005 vs. .343 SLG in roughly the same number of at bats, 466 vs. 464). Being six years younger, you also have to hope Broussard would be a little more durable and able to hold up all season long. I wouldn't drop Hatteberg -- just move him to where he rightfully belongs -- the bench -- given his age and his declining offense. Besides, keeping him is good insurance for whenever Broussard gets streaky and needs a competitive goose. This trade would be a baby step, but still a thing of beauty -- improving two positions simultaneously, while costing us very little moolah. Broussard represents a 1B upgrade over Hatteberg, while likewise, Aurilia or Freel are better 2B options than Womack. One caveat: If we could get Petagine for a song and prayer, I don't know that I'd bother with Broussard and his $2.5 million salary. Of course, if Broussard were the key to shipping off Womack, then the difference between $2.5 million and $2 million is but a small price to pay. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
You're soaking in it!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 3,335
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Quote:
__________________
"Sometimes, it's not the sexiest moves that put you over the top," Krivsky said. "It's a series of transactions that help you get there." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
He has the Evil Eye!
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: south of the border
Posts: 23,858
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Quote:
__________________
What are you, people? On dope? - Mr Hand |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,041
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
We don't have anything Cleveland would want for Broussard. They're looking to "upgrade" from Broussard, so how can we help them?
__________________
Rob Neyer: "Any writer who says he'd be a better manager than the worst manager is either 1) lying (i.e. 'using poetic license') or 2) patently delusional. Which isn't to say managers don't do stupid things that you or I wouldn't." |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Bristol, just around the corner from ESPN
Posts: 8,694
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Quote:
Ah yes, the infamous let's send Ben Broussard to Cleveland for Russell Branyan. Ironic if we'd get Broussard back after the fact. I hate to say it, but I'm a fan of both Broussard and Branyan and wish we would have kept Branyan as our everyday 3B and had Broussard as our everyday 1B. That's right, I said it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Quote:
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Puffy's Daddy
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Centerville, OH
Posts: 20,422
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Quote:
__________________
'When I'm not longer rapping, I want to open up an ice cream parlor and call myself Scoop Dogg.' -Snoop on his retirement Your Mom is happy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 118
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Was I asleep? Isn't Branyan in Tampa now? Or is this a past inside joke that I am missing out on?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 12,684
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
You people are having a Ben Broussard conversation, without ME?????
A pox on all of you!
__________________
"But I do know Joey's sister indirectly (or foster sister) and I have heard stories of Joey being into shopping, designer wear, fancy coffees, and pedicures." |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Bender?
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 | |
|
This one's for you Edd
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton Area
Posts: 8,471
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
Quote:
And whatever you do in your dwelling, stays there...
__________________
Some people play baseball. Baseball plays Jay Bruce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
|
Re: Ben Broussard vs. Scott Hatteberg
The return of Broussard, a dream come true!!!
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |