It's still possible it could be in place by next season.
http://deadspin.com/mlb-set-to-consi...ery-1137610450
It's still possible it could be in place by next season.
http://deadspin.com/mlb-set-to-consi...ery-1137610450
I'm all for it as long as they have rules in place that give each team a limited number of instant replay appeals per game. Otherwise this could get ridiculous, where every 2 minutes a manager asks for an instant replay review.
I don't want any appeals from the manager. I would like it set up like college football, or the last two minutes of an NFL game. An ump in a booth somewhere, looking over every play. If he sees something worth reviewing, he contacts the umps on the field. That would be the speediest, least intrusive and fairest way to handle it, imo.
Hoping to change my username to 75769024
AtomicDumpling (08-14-2013),BluegrassRedleg (08-15-2013),Cursh14 (03-10-2014),mth123 (08-14-2013),Norm Chortleton (08-15-2013),RedsBaron (08-14-2013),remdog (08-15-2013),Roy Tucker (08-15-2013),thatcoolguy_22 (12-02-2013),The DARK (08-14-2013),Tom Servo (08-14-2013),vaticanplum (08-14-2013),Wonderful Monds (08-14-2013)
I'm all for it, within the bounds of common sense (Either limited number of challenges or the having ump monitors jump in whenever there's a doubt).
If done correctly, this is not going to extend the game at all.
How much time is wasted today because the manager or 1b coach feels obligated to argue with the ump (Even though there's no chance of an overturn).
Plus, it opens the door for automated ball/strike calls in the future
[Phil ] Castellini celebrated the team's farm system and noted the team had promising prospects who would one day be great Reds -- and then joke then they'd be ex-Reds, saying "of course we're going to lose them". #SellTheTeamBob
Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
Yeah I think this can be a good thing as long as it's not overused. If we start stopping the game to review everything, it will be a mockery.
I think fair/foul, homer/no homer and those things should be reviewed automatically on each play. I think there should be some limitations for reviewing out/safe calls.
"No matter how good you are, you're going to lose one-third of your games. No matter how bad you are you're going to win one-third of your games. It's the other third that makes the difference." ~Tommy Lasorda
George Anderson (08-14-2013)
Tom Servo (08-14-2013)
The system to model on is the NHL. Hopefully the plan they ultimately adopt is like hockey's. It sounds like they are trying to build a "best of all worlds" system, which is great if they succeed.
Can they figure out how to do this without all the umpires scuttling off to the bowels of the stadium for fifteen minutes?
Crumbley (08-14-2013)
There is no such thing as a pitching prospect.
Crumbley (08-14-2013),westofyou (08-14-2013),Wonderful Monds (08-14-2013)
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |