So says John Fay.
http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2...better-in-2011
Do you agree ?
So says John Fay.
http://news.cincinnati.com/article/2...better-in-2011
Do you agree ?
I agree.
I agree too. It is amazing what can happen when high end talent gets a chance to mature. Hopefully Bailey matures into at least a solid #3.
Dubito Ergo Cogito Ergo Sum.
Who in the world would dispute this? Of course the Reds are better with their own talent maturing, guys like Chapman, Wood, Stubbs, and Bruce.
I think people are just worried that other teams in the division have gotten much better. Doubt anyone is arguing the Reds are worse today than this time last year.
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back.
At best, Push. While some youngsters have matured a little bit; Rolen is a year older. Phillips has more wear and tear on the tires. Rhodes is now gone. Cordero is a ticking time bomb in some folks eyes. Of course, I think that Harang isn't going to be pitching against #1 guys is a plus. Some would say the fact he won't be pitching at all is a plus. I don't think we're necessarily better than last year--but when you look at the beginning of seasons like 2005, 2006, 2007, etc. we are A LOT further along. We are in the mix, we are relevant. But heading into last year I knew we would be pretty tough to beat.
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2015 Attendance Record: 2-0
2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1
http://www.baseball-reference.com/pl...&t=p&year=2010
Carpenter, Zambrano, Josh Johnson to open the season. Carpenter again three starts later. And you're right rotations get jumbled because of staggered off days, injuries, etc.
You might be in the camp that Harang wasn't that bad. I don't think he should have faced a #1 starter even 1% of the time. Every 5th time out or 20% of the time (possibly reduced from 25% or 30% because he didn't end up making a full seasons worth of starts) it was nearly a guaranteed loss because he couldn't hang with #1's. So from this standpoint we're better already.
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2015 Attendance Record: 2-0
2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1
The fact that I even predicted a team who hadn't had a winning record in how many seasons to have a winning record means I thought they would be pretty tough. How many people were gun shy? I was one of them. People did it every year with the Reds. I was trying to make a wise and conservative yet accurate prediction. It was probably also before the rosters were finalized. I still didn't see them as being better than the Cardinals, no. But heading into last year, 83 wins qualifies as pretty tough to me with the way things had went in the previous decade.
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2015 Attendance Record: 2-0
2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2015 Attendance Record: 2-0
2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1
Only guy who ended up with the #1 best number on his respective team but Chris Carpenter was a #1, as was Zambrano and if you want me to dig I'll find some more #1's who Harang pitched against. But does it really matter? Him throwing against a 2 or 3 was still a huge disadvantage whether it was Jaime Garcia or Rowland Smith or Hiroki Kuroda (twice), etc.
He also pitched against Roy Halladay.
2009 Attendance Record: 3-5 2010 Attendance Record: 2-9 2015 Attendance Record: 2-0
2011 Attendance Record: 3-4 2012 Attendance Record: 3-4
2013 Attendance Record: 5-2 2014 Attendance Record: 3-1
Are they better than this time last year? Yeah, somewhat. Is that good enough to win the division again? Debateable.
Alot rests on the shoulders of Rolen and Gomes, IMO. If they get near the same perfornance for each, then they should be fine. I would prefer that they add on more piece from the outside that is a clear upgrade. Probably won't happen, but I've had a feeling that Walt will still make a move on par with the Chapman signing (or even more surprising) - I may be wrong, but that feeling is still there.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |