I think it's very unclutch to dismiss any opponent in a clutch situation.
I think it's very unclutch to dismiss any opponent in a clutch situation.
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
I have an easier time identifying pitchers whom I believe to be "clutch" pitchers than I do clutch hitters. Guys such as Sandy Koufax, Bob Gibson, John Smoltz and Curt Schilling consistently seemd to "come through" in big games, post-season contests.Originally Posted by TRF
"Hey...Dad. Wanna Have A Catch?" Kevin Costner in "Field Of Dreams."
If someone like Tony Perez or Big Poppi drives in the winning run late in a close game some will surely label them "Clutch Hitters" because those situations are easy to remember, it's very easy to forget the times so called " Clutch Hitters" fail to deliver the big hit during an entire career, weather they happen in the third, sixth or last inning of a ballgame.
Most Reds Fans believe that Big Poppi has more walk off homers than Adam Dunn. It aint so.
Most baseball fans relate driving in the winning run as clutch. It aint necessarily so.
Gimme the guy that avoids making outs and keeps hope alive by keeping the inning going.
Last edited by Ron Madden; 02-24-2009 at 03:21 AM.
http://sonsofsamhorn.net/wiki/index.php/Ortiz_Walk_Offs
For real?
"Reality tells us there are no guarantees. Except that some day Jon Lester will be on that list of 100-game winners." - Peter Gammons
Tiger Woods and Michael Jordan say hi.
I believe athletes can raise their levels of play during crunch time. Adrenaline and other factors can heighten the senses to perform at higher levels. It's similar to how the human body can perform more than normal in times of stress....ex: a person being able to lift more than normal because a life is on the line.
That being said, I do think it's more difficult to quantify clutch in baseball compared to most other sports. But, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
"....the two players I liked watching the most were Barry Larkin and Eric Davis. I was suitably entertained by their effortless skill that I didn't need them crashing into walls like a squirrel on a coke binge." - dsmith421
Exactly. Well said.
We'll go down in history as the first society that wouldn't save itself because it wasn't cost effective ~ Kurt Vonnegut
I'll second that. Athletes like Woods and Jordan have that single minded drive that allows them to concentrate even more in critical situations. I don't know that the "little extra" that some athletes have is something that can be measured. I have played with, coached, and been around a lot of very talented athletes. Some athletes have that "something" that allows them to
perform at their best in tough situations. I've seen guys that could sink 50 free throws in a row consistently in practice, but put them in a real game situation where there is pressure and they couldn't sink two in a row. Be up by 15 and there was no problem. Same with hitters and fielders in baseball. There is "that something" that some athletes have. Maybe it isn't called "clutch" but it is something. I think a lot of it is having a strong mind that does not allow or accept failure on any kind of a regular basis.
Last edited by RollyInRaleigh; 02-24-2009 at 08:23 AM.
Has there ever been a study that showed Jordan has a higher shooting percentage in a clutch situation than he did overall. Likewise does Tiger put better on hole 18 during Sunday afternoons than other times?
I honestly don't know the answer. But in baseball the clutch narrative has been challenged a myriad of ways by stats and we're still looking for validation of it's "intuitive" existence.
"This isn’t stats vs scouts - this is stats and scouts working together, building an organization that blends the best of both worlds. This is the blueprint for how a baseball organization should be run. And, whether the baseball men of the 20th century like it or not, this is where baseball is going."---Dave Cameron, U.S.S. Mariner
Confirmation bias has got to be a huge determinant in any non-scientific discussion of clutch.
Going along the lines of the pitcher - batter relationship in clutch situations, shouldn't it be considered that situations defined as clutch affect both batter and pitcher equally? Given this assumption, wouldn't it also mean that a clutch outcome for a batter could be an equally choke outcome for the pitcher or vice-versa? Seems to me you've got X amount of clutch on one side and X amount of choke on the other, or they cancel each other out (assuming clutch and choke are opposite sides of the same scale). So who's in control of the situation? I don't know if there's a conclusion to be drawn in this rambling, so I'll just take a slight bow.
It's possible that the presence of certain players changes the clutch quotient of a situation. Coming up with the winning run on base and facing Billy Wagner is different from the same situation against Majewski.
Well doesn't Billy Wagner affect his own clutch situation? I mean, the entirety of the situation, batter and pitcher, must be taken in to account. Billy Wagner giving up the winning run over Majewski would signifiy an increase in choke, even more so given a poor batter like Corey Patterson. I don't think you can look at a batter's situation in a vaccuum from the pitchers situation, they're the same situation!
Those two are and were the best players in their respective sports. Could it be that they are/were just playing up to their own (high) level?
Billy Wagner vs. Juan Castro is not as clutch for Billy Wagner as it is for Juan Castro.
Exactly! So if Billy Wanger succeeds, it's a small amount of clutch for Billy and a small amount of choke for Juan. But if Juan succeeds, it's a HUGE amount of clutch for Juan and a HUGE amount of choke for Billy. The clutch/choke on either side scales at the same rate.
Or that it is the other competitors who are choking and Tiger and Jordan are merely maintaining their level of play? These are very difficult questions to answer...
Posting Permissions
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Reply With Quote