Turn Off Ads?
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 53 of 53

Thread: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

  1. #46
    Member Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by mth123 View Post
    That option escalates to $13 Million based on IP. Considering that he goes deep in games and never misses a start, he'll be a $13 Million guy next year.

    Bringing Arroyo back should be the minimum that they do for 2011. I'd rather they pass and use the money for the TOR.
    Its tough to pay a $2M buyout. Its also tough to pay a solid to good pitcher $13M. Thats a TOR salary & Bronson isn't close to that.
    However, the $2M is a sunk cost. Would I pay Bronson $11M for 2011 or would i let him go & put the money to work elsewhere? I say wait & see how Volquez, Bailey & Chapman do for the rest of 2010 before making that decision.
    .


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #47
    Battle Toad Historian thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Myrtle Beach SC
    Posts
    2,004

    Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

    I don't like paying Bronson 13 million for a minimum upgrade over league minimum players in house already. Decline the option and attempt to resign him cheaply. If not you now have 13m to put towards upgrading the club in other places.

  4. #48
    Member camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    12,426

    Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by thatcoolguy_22 View Post
    I don't like paying Bronson 13 million for a minimum upgrade over league minimum players in house already. Decline the option and attempt to resign him cheaply. If not you now have 13m to put towards upgrading the club in other places.
    Arroyo has already made it clear that he won't stay for a discount because he got burned by Boston. If you decline his option, he's walking.

  5. #49
    Flash the leather! _Sir_Charles_'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    11,563

    Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

    I'd offer him arbitration, let him decline and move on, then take the picks. (at least I think that's how it works).

    I like Bronson, but we're fighting for rotation spots as it is already, no need to do that AND fork over a ton of loot we need to sign the kids.

  6. #50
    Battle Toad Historian thatcoolguy_22's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Myrtle Beach SC
    Posts
    2,004

    Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by camisadelgolf View Post
    Arroyo has already made it clear that he won't stay for a discount because he got burned by Boston. If you decline his option, he's walking.
    I'm completely fine with that. If he is resigned him and Cordero will be 25M of the team payroll. You still have to factor in raises for Votto, BP, Vueto, Volquez, etc etc. I would rather see that bit of money going to a LTC for Votto if nothing else.

  7. #51
    High five!
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Irvine, CA
    Posts
    6,976

    Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    I'd offer him arbitration, let him decline and move on, then take the picks. (at least I think that's how it works).

    I like Bronson, but we're fighting for rotation spots as it is already, no need to do that AND fork over a ton of loot we need to sign the kids.
    I think there's a team option for next year. $13mm if the Reds offer, $2mm buyout.

  8. #52
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,318

    Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

    Quote Originally Posted by _Sir_Charles_ View Post
    I'd offer him arbitration, let him decline and move on, then take the picks. (at least I think that's how it works).
    Or, you pay him $2M to decline his option, offer him arbitration, have him accept, and likely pay him more in total than the $13M you decline (after accounting for the option buyout).

    Offering him arbitration is suicide.

  9. #53
    Member camisadelgolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    12,426

    Re: Bronson: should he be signed to a long term contract?

    Yeah, there's no way he'd earn a pay cut in arbitration. If you want him for next year, pick up the option. If you want him behind that, wait until next year to decide.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator