Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    38,000

    Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    That is some serious fire power right there. IMO these are the three guys the Reds need to build the offense around. Sign Dunn to a three or four year deal and watch him consistently give you 40+ homeruns and a .380+ OBP. He's cutting down on his K's and has his K/BB ratio right around 1:1 which means he's growing as a hitter. Just think how scary he can be if he continues to get better than he already is.

    Votto is proving right now that he can be a great major league hitter for a long time. Despite going through a recent slump he's still hitting .273/.339/.533 - .873 OPS and is on pace for 30+ doubles and 30+ homeruns. He'll eventually be a .375-.380+ OBP guy who belts 30 homeruns and OPS's .900. His ability to use all the fields will make him a great hitter for a long time.

    Jay Bruce is the guy who will be the best hitter of them all IMO. He's got a chance to be a .325 type hitter who hits 40-45 doubles and around 40 homeruns. Like Votto, Bruce is not afraid to use the whole field as he's got exceptional power to all parts of the field. He won't hit for that high of an average right now but he profiles as that type of hitter.

    You put those three guys together in a lineup and you have a great nucleus to build around. The Reds need a RH power bat in there to compensate the lefties but I think Brandon Phillips and either Edwin Encarnacion or Todd Frazier can be that guy. Phillips is proving his power is not a fluke as he's on pace for roughly 30 homeruns and 40 doubles. He also seems to be improving his plate discipline (on pace for 46 walks). If he learns to lay off the slider down and away from RH pitchers then he could really become a true superstar. I like Edwin Encarnacion a lot but if the Reds decide to keep Dunn then they may look to trade Encarnacion and make Todd Frazier the 3B of the future. Either way, both those guys have good pop from the right side and can get on base.

    Basically what the Reds need is a shortstop, a center fielder who can cover a lot of ground and get on base at a decent clip, and a good defensive catcher. The way I see it, Paul Janish could be the SS of the future if the Reds can find a center fielder who can hit.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    and this year both Votto(OPS 998) and Dunn(OPS 854) have hit well off of lefties. Jr is one who has really struggled (OPS 567).

  4. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    38,000

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer85 View Post
    and this year both Votto(OPS 998) and Dunn(OPS 854) have hit well off of lefties. Jr is one who has really struggled (OPS 567).
    Yep. Bruce also hits lefties well. I know there aren't a lot of great lefties in the minors but a 1.071 OPS against lefties is impressive, no matter what level.

  5. #4
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Dusty's lineup construction gives pitchers a break ... I am guessing that the three will be far apart giving the pitcher time to get the other outs needed. I know Snell would not like to have to wade through them in the 3-4-5 spots tonight.

  6. #5
    Member RedsManRick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Guelph, ON
    Posts
    19,445

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Sign Dunn, keep Bruce in CF until his actual play merits a move, shift EE or Frazier to RF and you can keep everybody.

    I think Junior's horrific lack of range in RF has really exacerbated the CF problem. Put a good RF in place and an average-plus guy like Bruce makes the OF defense much less of a problem, especially given those bats.

    It would also let you carry Janish as your SS without having two black holes in the lineup. Let's be realistic; there aren't good-OBP plus defending CF available. Conceptually it's a great idea, but they just aren't out there to be had. Utilizing Bruce in CF and finding a better RF solution seems like the best approach to me.

    I know we lack a true leadoff hitter -- something which is bound to make Dusty bat Janish up at the top, but I'd love to see his hand forced by taking away those god-awful options.
    Games are won on run differential -- scoring more than your opponent. Runs are runs, scored or prevented they all count the same. Worry about scoring more and allowing fewer, not which positions contribute to which side of the equation or how "consistent" you are at your current level of performance.

  7. #6
    Member Spring~Fields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,630

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Quote Originally Posted by OnBaseMachine View Post
    That is some serious fire power right there. IMO these are the three guys the Reds need to build the offense around.

    You put those three guys together in a lineup and you have a great nucleus to build around.
    I have changed my mind since Raisors poll on Dunn, I would like to see the Reds retain his services to play as a group of Dunn, Votto, Bruce and Phillips, especially believing that Jocketty removes the rest of the inconsistent one or two dimensional deadwood for better players in due time, and bring those better players whoever they might be in time to play along with them, it’s seem to me that it might be an exciting time to be a Reds fan. Of course I assume that Jocketty will improve the defense and pitching to go along with them.

  8. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    West Virginia
    Posts
    38,000

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    I think we just need to cross our fingers and pray that Drew Stubbs pans out. One thing he can do is play gold glove caliber defense and get on base. Even with all his struggles last season he still got on base at a respectable .364 clip. This year he's at .373. His power isn't developing yet but his OBP skills are nice. If he can play gold glove defense, get on base at a .360+ clip and steal 30 bases in the majors then he could really be one of the better center fielders in the league. Best case scenario is he's ready to take over CF by 2010.

    Another intriguing CF option is Shaun Cumberland. He's a 23-year old prospect currently hitting .294/.396/.522 - .918 OPS in AA Chattanooga and he can play some solid center field.

  9. #8
    Member Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Quote Originally Posted by RedsManRick View Post
    Sign Dunn, keep Bruce in CF until his actual play merits a move, shift EE or Frazier to RF and you can keep everybody.

    I think Junior's horrific lack of range in RF has really exacerbated the CF problem. Put a good RF in place and an average-plus guy like Bruce makes the OF defense much less of a problem, especially given those bats.

    It would also let you carry Janish as your SS without having two black holes in the lineup. Let's be realistic; there aren't good-OBP plus defending CF available. Conceptually it's a great idea, but they just aren't out there to be had. Utilizing Bruce in CF and finding a better RF solution seems like the best approach to me.

    I know we lack a true leadoff hitter -- something which is bound to make Dusty bat Janish up at the top, but I'd love to see his hand forced by taking away those god-awful options.
    Freel is hitting well, has a good OBP & plays a nice corner outfield. Play him in RF and hit him leadoff. Play Bruce in CF. Start looking for a better option than Freel long term.
    .

  10. #9
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,806

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Walt's MO has been to trade to get talent rather than go through the FA market. Unless he's willing to trade Bruce, Vasquez or Cueto, he's not going to get a lot of talent back and I'm guessing those 3 are as untouchable and can be. If Walt is going to make a trade for talent, I would guess Dunn is his most valuable trading chip.
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  11. #10
    Member Spring~Fields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,630

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    Walt's MO has been to trade to get talent rather than go through the FA market. Unless he's willing to trade Bruce, Vasquez or Cueto, he's not going to get a lot of talent back and I'm guessing those 3 are as untouchable and can be. If Walt is going to make a trade for talent, I would guess Dunn is his most valuable trading chip.
    Aren't you forgetting that he has Bako, Patterson, Mercker and Hairston to trade also?

  12. #11
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,806

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Quote Originally Posted by SpringfieldFan View Post
    Aren't you forgetting that he has Bako, Patterson, Mercker and Hairston to trade also?

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  13. #12
    Member reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    29,518

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    The middle of the order should be Bruce/Phillips/Dunn/Votto in some order. It's pretty much a no brainer, IMO.
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    A little bit off topic, but do you guys think that Jesse Winker profiles more like Pete Rose or is he just the next Hal Morris??

  14. #13
    He has the Evil Eye! flyer85's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    south of the border
    Posts
    23,858

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
    The middle of the order should be Bruce/Phillips/Dunn/Votto in some order. It's pretty much a no brainer, IMO.
    against RHP Phillips should bat higher than 5th, he has awful splits.

  15. #14
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Quote Originally Posted by reds44 View Post
    The middle of the order should be Bruce/Phillips/Dunn/Votto in some order. It's pretty much a no brainer, IMO.
    Phillips
    Bruce
    Dunn
    Eddie
    Votto
    Junior
    Hariston
    Catcher

    With the team built the way it is now, Phillips really should be leading off.

    A top five of Phillips/Bruce/Dunn/Eddie/Votto would step on pitchers necks early.

  16. #15
    Member reds44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    29,518

    Re: Bruce/Dunn/Votto

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Phillips
    Bruce
    Dunn
    Eddie
    Votto
    Junior
    Hariston
    Catcher

    With the team built the way it is now, Phillips really should be leading off.

    A top five of Phillips/Bruce/Dunn/Eddie/Votto would step on pitchers necks early.
    I don't mind Edwin batting in the middle of the order when he is going well, but when he is going like he is right now he is just an outs machine who doesn't belong batting 4th.

    I can buy Phillips batting leadoff though, at least when Hairston stops hitting (which he will).
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    A little bit off topic, but do you guys think that Jesse Winker profiles more like Pete Rose or is he just the next Hal Morris??


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator