Turn Off Ads?
Page 1 of 13 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 192

Thread: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    1,735

    More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Was having this discussion with my brother earlier. There's no question the Cardinals starting rotation is the best in the league so far, but is their 25-man roster more talented than the Reds roster? I don't think so.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #2
    Member smixsell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,344

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Talent for what?

    For baseball............the Reds

    For whining or explaining things their sons......definitely the Cards.

  4. Likes:

    foxfire123 (05-13-2013),Redlegs (05-12-2013),Trajinous (05-30-2013)

  5. #3
    Salukifan2
    Guest

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    This screams paranoia/inferiority complex.

  6. Likes:

    Old school 1983 (05-12-2013)

  7. #4
    All work and no play..... Vottomatic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Lebanon
    Posts
    7,067

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    The stats and recent performances say otherwise, but I just feel like that staff shouldn't be that good.

    Wainwright and Garcia rarely throw strikes when I watch them pitch. Everything is around the plate, but out of the k zone. But the hitters swing and miss liberally. I'd like to see hitters be more patient against them and see what happens. AJ Burnett of the Pirates is like that. Around the plate, but not necessarily strikes. If you get an ump with a large K zone, it helps too.

    This is based on when I watch them. I'm sure they look better against other clubs.

  8. #5
    Member marcshoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Zeta Reticuli
    Posts
    10,040

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    I think the Reds have more talent right now, but the Cards farm system won't let them lag behind. Shelby Miller is already showing what he can do.

    I do think the rotation will regress, but they'll still be very good.
    It is on the whole probable that we continually dream, but that consciousness makes such a noise that we do not hear it. Carl Jung.

  9. #6
    Member smixsell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Mississippi
    Posts
    1,344

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    In all seriousness. The gap isn't tremendous, but I do think the Reds have more talent. Espescially pitching talent.

    I think regression will wind up being a charitable description of the Card's pitching staff when the big 162 is done.

  10. #7
    Member 757690's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Venice
    Posts
    33,290

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by smixsell View Post
    In all seriousness. The gap isn't tremendous, but I do think the Reds have more talent. Espescially pitching talent.

    I think regression will wind up being a charitable description of the Card's pitching staff when the big 162 is done.
    I know everyone loves Shelby Miller right now, and he looks great. But just for some perspective:

    Mike Leake after his first 11 starts was 5-0 with a 2.22 ERA
    Travis Wood after his first 9 starts was 4-1 with a 2.52 ERA
    Tim Pugh after his first 7 starts was 4-2 with a 2.58 ERA

    And for those asking whose Tim Pugh? I say... exactly.
    Hoping to change my username to 75769023

  11. Likes:

    remdog (05-12-2013),Trajinous (05-30-2013)

  12. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    309

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    I think talent... the Reds

    Advanced scouting / game plan -- Cardinals

    Thinking how good Edwin Jackson (only 29) looked with the Cards, and how bad he looks now with the Cubs.

    Throw in the fact that Jake Westbrook's ERA right now is 1.62 despite having 19 K's and 18 BB's in 39 Innings with a Whip at 1.46.

  13. Likes:

    OGB (05-13-2013)

  14. #9
    Posting from Southwest VA redsfaninbsg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Big Stone Gap, Va.
    Posts
    831

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    One thing is certain, St. Louis can't play any better than it is now. I still the Cardinals bullpen ends up costing them the division. The recent consistency of the Reds offense won't hurt either.
    This is the ol Left Hander rounding third and heading for home.

  15. #10
    Future Fame of Holler WildcatFan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Lexington, KY
    Posts
    2,650

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Let's break it down.

    Catcher: Yadier all day. Best in the league not named Buster.
    First Base: Big advantage Reds.
    Second Base: I take the Reds, but it's closer than you might think. Matt Carpenter is showing his potential at the plate.
    Third Base: Advantage Cards, but a big year from Frazier could make this at least a tie.
    Shortstop: Who knows? It's probably a wash, but I'll give a slight edge to Cozart because of glove and experience.
    Left field: Holliday, Holliday, Holliday. Even when Ludwick is healthy.
    Center field: Give me Choo seven days a week and twice Sundays. I know the defensive range is horrendous, but that dude flat rakes.
    Right field: Beltran. It pains me to say that, but Bruce just isn't there yet. Now that Beltran has been relatively healthy the last couple years, you've got to take him.

    #1 Starter: Wainwright is trying to make me choose him, but I'll take Cueto by a braid. Open to criticism here.
    #2 Starter: Latos over Garcia, and it's not particularly close.
    #3 Starter: I'm giving a tie to Westbrook and Arroyo. We know who Bronson is--I'm not sure we've seen the real Jake Westbrook recently. Smoke and mirrors.
    #4 Starter: Probably Lynn, although some of his K/BB success is probably due to coming from the pen. It's close. Homer could prove me wrong.
    #5 Starter: I feel confident just saying Shelby Miller by a mile. Any objections? I didn't think so.

    Bullpen: We don't even need to break this one down. Reds pen makes the Cards pen look like the Bad News Bears.

    After a completely arbitrary tally system, I'll give a slight edge to the Reds, but there's a reason these two have been battling for the better part of four seasons. A worthy rival, that's for sure. Feel free to rip my rankings--I did this in like 6 minutes.
    "I never argue with people who say baseball is boring, because baseball is boring. And then, suddenly, it isn't. And that's what makes it great." - Joe Posnanski

  16. Likes:

    Trajinous (05-30-2013)

  17. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo
    Posts
    3,737

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by 757690 View Post
    I know everyone loves Shelby Miller right now, and he looks great. But just for some perspective:

    Mike Leake after his first 11 starts was 5-0 with a 2.22 ERA
    Travis Wood after his first 9 starts was 4-1 with a 2.52 ERA
    Tim Pugh after his first 7 starts was 4-2 with a 2.58 ERA

    And for those asking whose Tim Pugh? I say... exactly.
    I don't think any of those players were considered the top pitching prospect in baseball at any points in their minor league careers. Shelby Miller was ranked where he was for a reason. I'm not saying he will be THIS good but he has front of the rotation stuff. He's getting it done now with his fastball/curve and has yet to expose teams to his pretty good change up.

  18. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo
    Posts
    3,737

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by redsfaninbsg View Post
    One thing is certain, St. Louis can't play any better than it is now. I still the Cardinals bullpen ends up costing them the division. The recent consistency of the Reds offense won't hurt either.
    I've been on record here saying that the bullpen will cost them the division. That's before the recent moves they have made though. Adding Mujica as the closer and bringing up two studs including Carlos Martinez has really solidified the pen. Rosenthal has been pitching great as of late. The Cardinals didn't wait until July to fix their pen like they did the previous two years. If they were going to stick with the group they had, I would agree with you but the paradigm shifted when they brought in more talented pitchers.

  19. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,308

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    I'd take Frazier over Freese, as Freese is absolutely terrible right now.

    Cozart over Kozma is pretty simple in my mind because of defence alone.

    Bruce is better than Beltran, as Beltran looks terrible on defence and looks like he can't move that well.

    A lot depends on the health of the Cards like Beltran and Freese.

  20. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,308

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeThierry View Post
    .... and bringing up two studs including Carlos Martinez has really solidified the pen....
    Maness is a stud?

    Who knew?

  21. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo
    Posts
    3,737

    Re: More talent: Reds or Cardinals?

    Quote Originally Posted by PuffyPig View Post
    I'd take Frazier over Freese, as Freese is absolutely terrible right now.

    Cozart over Kozma is pretty simple in my mind because of defence alone.

    Bruce is better than Beltran, as Beltran looks terrible on defence and looks like he can't move that well.

    A lot depends on the health of the Cards like Beltran and Freese.
    I agree with you about Freese. He has the ability to be a top 10 3B though. Right now as it stands, Frazier gets the edge.

    I have to disagree with you about Kozma vs. Cozart. Though Cozart is a bit better defensively than Kozma, I think Kozma's offense is way better than Cozart's right now. To me, it's a wash. Fangraphs essentially shows that.

    I completely disagree with you about Bruce. Though Bruce is playing slightly better, even though Bruce is having a down defensive year, Beltran's offense puts him over the top right now. In fact, according to Fangraphs, Bruce is having a -.4 WAR season thus far compared to Beltran's .8. There's no question in my mind who is better right now.


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator