I don't understand those that say there was not enough evidence to convict her. I agree the evidence was shaky to convict her of 1st degree murder but there was all kinds of evidence that she was responsible for her daughter's death.
1) FBI expert testified that there was chloroform in her trunk
2) Many folks including her Mom testified that her trunk smelled like a dead body
3) Her behavior. She acted as if she had something to cover up
4) Lots of searches on her computer for chloroform
5) She was the last person to see her daughter alive
6) Duct tape was indicative of a crime, not an accidental drowning
The early returns are showing that the jury didn't understand the evidence and that's very troubling
At the very least this should have been a manslaughter