Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 41

Thread: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    Keep in mind that Arroyo and Harang are getting older, not better. Owings is marginal. Volquez is having some health issues.

    Zach Stewart has a handful of minor league starts under his belt. I don't think that qualifies as an adequate insurance policy for the major league 5-man rotation.

    Wood's a corner guy anyway, and the Reds are set there, I think.

    No way on this deal.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Box of Frogs edabbs44's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    16,358

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    I would do it.

  4. #18
    Member Will M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    4,544

    yes

    Doug,

    this is a trade i have suggested before. both are former grade A prospects who for whatever reason have stalled at AAA. just as Reds fans wonder if Bailey will ever get it done in a Reds uniform I suspect Angels fans wonder if Wood will ever get it done in an Angels uniform. both players seem to need a change of scenery. it could be a win-win type trade for both teams.

    - Will
    .

  5. #19
    Member GOYA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Louisville, KY
    Posts
    5,143

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
    Wood's a corner guy anyway, and the Reds are set there, I think.
    He has played quite a bit of SS and has done OK there. He's no Janish.
    Keep in mind that the PCL inflates stats a bit, Wood's low BB rate and the apparent consistency now shown by Homer and I have to agree that this is a poor trade.

  6. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    He has played quite a bit of SS and has done OK there. He's no Janish.
    They've been playing him at 1B lately. He won't end up at SS.

  7. #21
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,602

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    He has played 3 games at 1B in his Minor League career...what do you base your statement "He won't end up at SS" on? He has been an effective SS in the minors.

    Bum

  8. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    959

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    I say no

    I am a firm believer in the theory that you can never have too much pitching. If you look around the league and see how much garbage there is at the back end of most major league rotations, you can really do some damage over 162 games if your #4 or #5 guys profile as league average #3. I think realistically Homer can be a #3.

    Wood on the other hand profiles as a 3b or 1B, not a SS. He has not proven he can do it at the major league level yet and we already have log jams in the minors at those spots he really does not fill any gap within the organization.

  9. #23
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    He has played 3 games at 1B in his Minor League career...what do you base your statement "He won't end up at SS" on? He has been an effective SS in the minors.
    He's played mostly 3B in his time in Anaheim, he's been playing 1B in AAA lately, and he's a big guy who doesn't have a lot of range.

  10. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,602

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    I don't see any 'hard' evidence there that suggests he cannot play SS. Have you looked at Salt Lake's roster? They have very little in the infield at all (other than Kendrick at 2B). He is pretty much playing everywhere and he has played a lot more SS even this year than other positions. I don't think one can see that he has played 2 out of the last 7 games at 1B (and 3 in his minor league career) and decide that he can't play SS. He isn't small, but he isn't immobile or larger than other SS from the past that have been effective (Ripken, A-Rod). He has always been credited with being an average SS defensively. When did this change? Doug, what do you think?

    Bum

  11. #25
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    As far as I have heard, nothing has changed in the idea that Wood can't play at SS. He certainly has not carried as bad of a wrap at SS as our own Chris Valaika has and most guys don't seem to have an issue with him sticking there.

  12. #26
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    I don't see any 'hard' evidence there that suggests he cannot play SS. Have you looked at Salt Lake's roster? They have very little in the infield at all (other than Kendrick at 2B). He is pretty much playing everywhere and he has played a lot more SS even this year than other positions. I don't think one can see that he has played 2 out of the last 7 games at 1B (and 3 in his minor league career) and decide that he can't play SS. He isn't small, but he isn't immobile or larger than other SS from the past that have been effective (Ripken, A-Rod). He has always been credited with being an average SS defensively.
    The game is evolving, and defense is becoming more important. Wood as a SS is on the wrong side of that trend.

  13. #27
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
    The game is evolving, and defense is becoming more important. Wood as a SS is on the wrong side of that trend.
    And Alex Gonzalez with a .500 OPS isn't on the wrong side of everything?

  14. #28
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Shelburne Falls, MA
    Posts
    12,227

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    And Alex Gonzalez with a .500 OPS isn't on the wrong side of everything?
    Do you disagree with the notion that the game is evolving towards an increased emphasis on defense?

    Time will tell if Wood's a SS.

  15. #29
    Sprinkles are for winners dougdirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    49,393

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    Quote Originally Posted by lollipopcurve View Post
    Do you disagree with the notion that the game is evolving towards an increased emphasis on defense?

    Time will tell if Wood's a SS.
    I think its evolving to a point where lesser bats don't hurt as much because the leagues OPS is down across the board. Still, if some of the options are .600 OPS shortstops of Brandon Wood types, give me the BW types all day long.

  16. #30
    he/him *BaseClogger*'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    7,803

    Re: Homer Bailey hypothetical trade talk

    Who cares about trends? I want the best baseball players...


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator