Turn Off Ads?
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 41

Thread: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

  1. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta, aka, the most prosperous city in the world.
    Posts
    13,317

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
    They have avoided arbitration already, they are trying to avoid him becoming a Super 2.

    A super 2 means early arbitration.

    By having him in the minors for even 1 day, they have added an extra year to his FA.

    Unless they want him available for arbitration a year early, he needs to be in the minors a little longer.


  2. Turn Off Ads?
  3. #17
    Member Spring~Fields's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Posts
    8,630

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by RedlegJake View Post
    Dunn in left, Patterson in CF and Bruce in right, Votto at first, Freel at 2nd, Phillips at SS, EE at third and Bako catching. Hairston IF/OF sub and Janish IF sub, Andy Phillips 1B sub, Hopper OF sub, Ross C sub. Junior, Valentin and Hatteberg gone.

    Dunn in left, Bruce in CF, Junior in RF, Votto at first, Freel at 2nd, Phillips at SS, EE at third and Bako catching. Hairston IF/OF sub and Janish IF sub, Andy Phillips 1B sub, Patterson OF sub, Ross C sub. Hopper, Valentin and Hatteberg gone.

    Either way OBP improves, Power improves, defense improves, speed improves, bench improves. In the second case Junior can sit more often and Bruce can take RF with CP in CF. Either way Hairston can sub out Freel at 2B every few games, Janish can slide into SS late and Phillips move back to 2nd and Phillips gives you a RH bat to sub w/Votto against tough lefties or to PH.

    The one thing that is certain is that this team can be improved immediately if the FO wants to make some tough decisions. They can get Bruce up with plenty of playing time. They can get a RH bat for the bench from Louisville in Phillips. Even if they can't move Junior they can still make moves that get better fitting players on the team.

    If ruthlessness is what you want to call it then it's ruthless but if Cast sincerely wants to win Valentin and Hatteberg go away - PTBNL or DFA. Jay Bruce in the OF and Andy Phillips on the bench improve this team -and I think by a fairly large measure.

    Then carry the same thinking to pitching and move Fogg, slot Belisle to the pen as long reliever and spot starter, and bring up Bailey for the 5 spot. Or Lehr if you really want Bailey at AAA for awhile longer.

    DFA Mike Lincoln and see if Maj has turned it around. I'm tempted to say Roenicke but I don't think he's really ready yet. Ruthless? Heck yes, I'd go through Fogg, Belisle, Adkins, Lincoln, Majewski, Coffey, and others and trade or cut the ones that don't fit/aren't improving/aren't part of tomorrow's team and find an appropriate role for the ones remaining.

    I'm not talking trades or deals here, at least any that bring substantial return, just things that can be done now, right now, that would improve this team from the players it has right now. THEN, with the deadwood cleared away they begin looking outside the organization for trades and moves to really improve.
    Nice work.

    Let's do it and make the rest of the season actually entertaining.

  4. #18
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    One way to find out is to see if he floats.
    You could build a bridge out of him

  5. #19
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    You could build a bridge out of him

    But can you not also build bridges out of stone?
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  6. #20
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    But can you not also build bridges out of stone?
    oh

  7. #21
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    oh

    Does wood sink in water?
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  8. #22
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    Does wood sink in water?
    No! We'll throw Dunn into the pond!

  9. #23
    Pre-tty, pre-tty good!! MWM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    12,334

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    But can you not also build bridges out of stone?
    or peaches....
    Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David

  10. #24
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    No! We'll throw Dunn into the pond!

    No, what else floats in water?
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  11. #25
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    No, what else floats in water?
    apples! little small rocks! cider! Cider!



    A DUCK!

  12. #26
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    A DUCK!
    Exactly! So logically...
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  13. #27
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    Exactly! So logically...
    So...if Dunn weighs the same as a duck...he's made of wood.

  14. #28
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    So...if Dunn weighs the same as a duck...he's made of wood.

    And therefore...
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right

  15. #29
    RaisorZone Raisor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    On Assignment
    Posts
    24,435

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Chip R View Post
    And therefore...
    You know, you aren't setting a good example for a moderator.

    And therefore....A WITCH!!!!

  16. #30
    Rally Onion! Chip R's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2000
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    41,807

    Re: Reds By The Numbers -JOHN ERARDI

    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    You know, you aren't setting a good example for a moderator.

    And therefore....A WITCH!!!!

    We're just scientifically proving that Dunn is a witch. You know, he turned me into a newt.
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    I was wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by Raisor View Post
    Chip is right


Turn Off Ads?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!


RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball


Contact us: Boss | Gallen5862 | Plus Plus | Powel Crosley | RedlegJake | The Operator