Originally Posted by
mace
First off, I'm as impressed as anyone with the Reds' proactive surge of the last few weeks. They're doing what needs to be done to compete immediately, and it's compelling. But I'm not convinced that Castellini deserves the accolades that have come his way for the roster upgrades. I'm not seeing see any significant outlay on his part.
A disclaimer: I don't have some of the definitive salary numbers at my fingertips, so there's plenty of wiggle room in which I might be mistaken. For instance, I'm not sure if Latos, who is not yet arbitration-eligible, will still be making the minimum this year. My figures are very approximate. But the way it appears to me, the Reds really haven't taken on any appreciable salary.
They're no longer paying a closer who made 12.1 million last year. Volquez earned (the term applied loosely) just over 1.6. Alonso's due a million this year. Then there are the minimum salaries of Sappelt, Grandal and Boxberger. That's about (a shade under) 16 million no longer on the payroll. On the flip side, the Reds will be paying Madson 8.5 million, Marshall 3.1, Ludwick 2.5, Navarro about a million, Brackman just under a million, and Latos (could be wrong here) and Judy the minimum. That's a fraction under 17 million. So the net cash expense has been about a million--with, as I said, some margin for error there.
No doubt, the club has paid dearly in young talent. That's an unmistakable sacrifice and commitment. But frankly, I can't see that the "all-in" description really applies to ownership. In fact, except for the startling signing of Chapman (and to a lesser extent, Rolen's extension), I'm yet to see Castellini live up to the promises he made when he bought the club--namely, that he would do whatever it takes to bring home a winner. To be sure, he's a far sight better than Lindner as an owner, mostly because he actually cares and has a clue. However, his rhetoric seems largely empty to me.
It could be countered that the club has large extensions, arbitrations, etc., coming up in the next year or two. Yes, there's Votto, Phillips, Latos, Marshall, Madson, Arredondo, et al. Yet, to this point nothing has been committed on those fronts, notably Votto and Phillips. (In Votto's case, I'm sure it's through no fault of the organization's.) And if the Reds are truly "all-in" for 2012, those future considerations should not really be germane.
I'm hoping that the Ludwick deal means they still intend to make some news with another pitcher or whatever. But until then, I'm not convinced that ownership warrants much credit for what Jocketty has accomplished this winter.