Yikes, not sure that means good things about Marshall.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mlb...-trade-rumors/
I know the date on this article is a little older, but it suggests that the Marlins might want two prospects in the Top 100. I checked the list and we have 4 of them in the list: Hamilton, Stephenson, Cingrani, and Corcino.
I do not know much about our minors and what may sway the Marlins to bite. Any ideas as to what it might take to get Stanton?
2015 Attendance 2-1 (4/6, 4/7,4/24)
2014 Attendance 1-3 (3/31, 4/12, 8/14)
2013 Attendance: 6-0 (4/3, 4/16, 4/17, 8/3, 8/21, 9/7)
More than the Reds are going to offer? What makes anyone on here think that just because Stanton fits one of the Reds needs that the Marlins will subsequently just trade him to the Reds? I have never seen a legitimate source suggest that the Reds and Marlins are talking about a deal involving Stanton...
Bum
traderumor (07-17-2013)
Hoping to change my username to 75769024
Mitri (07-17-2013)
Hoping to change my username to 75769024
Edd Roush (07-17-2013),traderumor (07-17-2013)
I would trade Votto, Stephenson, Cingrani, Hamilton, Winker, Chapman and Ervin for Miguel Cabrera and not even think twice about it.
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |