![]() |
|
|
#31 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,658
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
I think Mesoraco is still somewhat of an ace in the hole for the Reds long term as well. If he plays out 2013 and 2014 behind, or with, Hannigan, he'll be entering his prime as an affordable offensive threat at a premium position. This slow progress approach isn't hurting the Reds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carbondale IL
Posts: 400
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
Does anyone else think the Pirates will completely mismanage their youth and end up just being the same old pirates?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
I wouldn't be shocked to see a TV deal for them reach the 80-100 million range. Their current TV deal is actually pitiful, like the Braves TV contract.
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
I'm optimistic for them.
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carbondale IL
Posts: 400
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
Oh i know its pitiful. Correct me if im wrong but isn't it only like 10 mil a year?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
I've heard it's around 14-20 million. I think Bill Dewitt was high when he signed that deal. Even at the time he signed it, it wasn't a great deal considering the TV ratings and the media market St. Louis is.
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Carbondale IL
Posts: 400
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
Im pretty sure the cardinals local rankings are in the top 5 in the league, but their regional ratings aren't very good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
It's still ranked as the 21st media market, which is larger than Nashville and San Diego.
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,417
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
Quote:
After that (if not sooner), the Cubs and Cardinals will likely be back in full force. The Brewers and Pirates may be. And the Reds will likely go through a period of rebuilding that will position them to compete again in the 2018-2020 range, when guys like Stephenson, Winker, Travieso, et al (as well as others who aren't even in the organization yet) are hopefully hitting their primes. Of course, it is possible the Reds can still be a contending team in the 2016-2017 time period. But they'll have to shell out a LOT of dough to keep several of the guys like Latos, Bailey, Cueto, Chapman and possibly Cozart/Frazier/Mesoraco in order to make sure that happens. And don't forget, they'll already be paying $52MM per year just for Votto, Phillips and Bruce, the latter of which will be hitting FA in 2017 (and the former two who will be well on the wrong side of 30/past their primes). As an aside (and back on thread topic), I wouldn't be shocked if Walt retires after "the window" - sometime around 2015/2016, mainly because he doesn't have the energy or desire to go through another rebuilding effort. He is the GM to take a team to the next (championship) level, not necessarily the right guy to spearhead a total overhaul/rebuilding effort.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! Last edited by Benihana; 01-30-2013 at 12:03 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 10,828
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
I think the Reds did fine having three players in the top one hundred. The Reds system has been depleted via trades and promotions in recent years and it's hard to replenish quickly. Particularly since the ballclub is now winning and it's draft position is lower.
Right now, IMO, the Reds have one very exciting prospect in Hamilton, but I don't see any sure things on the farm. Stephenson is just too junior at this point to count on. I think the Reds got a good benefit with the success of Cingrani, who has performed like a top prospect. Don't believe this much success was expected of him. We're in a new era now. Reds won't be drafting that high, hopefully, so I don't expect many more Jay Bruces in the near future. But if they keep adding to the system, guys, like a Cingrani, will emerge. As for Jocketty, I'm not sure his Cards experience is relevant. The Reds still need the draft very much, they are still not a top revenue team apparently, so whether the Cards focused sufficiently on the draft is besides the point. The Reds farm guys must keep churning out those prospects as best they can. It's key for a club like the Reds, even though with lower draft position it's not easy. Last edited by Kc61; 01-30-2013 at 12:54 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Bedford, KY
Posts: 8,992
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
You're right. My math was way off (though flagrant is more than a little hyperbolic).
Quick question: what other GM has been better than Jocketty in drafting All-Stars over the past 20 years or so? Another way to tackle this: If Jocketty were indeed a poor drafter, it should show up in his players inabilities to get to the major leagues, or, in the case of poor teams, perform poorly once they get there. This past season, Jocketty-acquired draftees and minor league, post-draft free agent signees had a WAR of 17.9 for the Cardinals. (Five years later, btw, he's still "responsible" for almost half the St. Louis WAR from last season.) I'll add other picks he made that are currently playing for other teams (Daric Barton, Colby Rasmus, Pujols, Adam Kennedy) and his Cincinnati first-round picks as well (ie., Leake, Grandal, Alonso). I also include Aroldis Chapman, as he was a free agent. That's another 16.0 WAR. To round out the team with 25 players, we'll add Brad Boxberger's -0.1 WAR last season in San Diego. That's a 25-man roster of players drafted/ developed under Jocketty with a WAR of 33.8. I suspect few other GMs will come close to that. He's certainly in the top five. (Fwiw, the entire Red team had a WAR of 48.3 last season.) In short, Jocketty's tenure as a GM has shown an ability to draft well, trade well, and sign intelligently. He's a true triple threat GM and the Reds are lucky to have him. Jocketty is pretty much universally held as an upper echelon GM. His three Executive of the Year trophies corroborate that.
__________________
"You can learn little from victory. You can learn everything from defeat." -- Christy Matthewson "Show me a good loser and I'll show you an idiot." -- Leo Durocher |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 3,109
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
Quote:
__________________
“Our next home stand follows this road trip.” “I just want to tell everyone Happy Easter and Happy Hanukkah.” says on the day before Easter Mike Shannon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Where's my chair?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,790
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
Quote:
Also, with the new slotted draft system in place now, I expect the difference in the future to be even greater. The Yankees had low draft position but could count on talented players falling to them due to signablity concerns. Teams like NYY and Texas were unrestrained in their foreign talent acquision too. I think we are going to see a greater impact of draft creating parity the way it was intended to.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013! ![]() Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
Where's my chair?
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 19,790
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
Quote:
I also think the Reds have been great under Buckley/Jocketty at taking risks. 2 of our best prospects now.. Hamilton and Cingranni were not as well thought of by the rest of baseball at the time of the draft. Great scouting by the Reds. Now obviously, not all picks like this are going to work out, but the Reds have done an incredible job of grabbing the best available player in the draft.
__________________
Thank you Walt and Bob for going for it in 2012 AND 2013! ![]() Nov. 13, 2007: One of the greatest days in Reds history: John Allen gets the boot!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Cincy
Posts: 351
|
Re: Reds have 3 ranked in Top 100
Another reason that the Reds' system isnt ranked real high right now is because a lot of our minor league talent is in the lower levels of the system. The Reds have opted for HS talent with their high picks in recent drafts and those players take a while to climb the rankings. Stephenson, Travieso, Winker, etc. were all picked with long ETAs in mind.
Contrast this with a few years ago when the Reds were taking college players routinely in the first round (Leake, Alonso, Grandal). All of those players made it to the majors very quickly and it made the system as a whole look good when we had our first rounders in the upper minor leagues. The Reds could take a couple of college players early in the next draft and quickly resupply the upper levels of the system. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |