RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > Minor League Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-07-2013, 02:07 PM   #1
New Fever
Member
 
New Fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Memphis
Posts: 754
Keith Law Reds Top 10

www.espn.com/mlb/



1. Billy Hamilton, CF (30)



2. R. Stephenson, RHP (48)



3. Daniel Corcino, RHP (72)



4. Tony Cingrani, LHP (98)



5. Jesse Winker, RF



6. Nick Travieso, RHP



7. Jonathan Reynoso, CF



8. Ismael Guillon, LHP



9. Tanner Rahier, 3B



10. Daniel Langfield, RHP
New Fever is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 02-07-2013, 06:12 PM   #2
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Now that's more like it. Much better than Mayo's list, anyway.

Seems like BA is not the only one so high on Reynoso.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2013, 06:58 PM   #3
Superdude
Member
 
Superdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,431
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Reynoso is getting some serious love. I'm intrigued
Superdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 09:25 AM   #4
mdccclxix
Member
 
mdccclxix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,661
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Maybe they talked to the same people.
mdccclxix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 06:28 PM   #5
Helms1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

I just have to ask this group what are the odds of the 5 pitchers listed making significant contributions to the Reds as a starter or reliever? Now to me that is the most important question to be asked about the farm system, and you guys have always impressed me with the most knowledge about the subject at hand as any group on these boards after 3 years of reading.
Helms1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2013, 07:59 PM   #6
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Helms1 View Post
I just have to ask this group what are the odds of the 5 pitchers listed making significant contributions to the Reds as a starter or reliever? Now to me that is the most important question to be asked about the farm system, and you guys have always impressed me with the most knowledge about the subject at hand as any group on these boards after 3 years of reading.
I think the only three I'd count on at the moment having a big league impact are Stephenson, Cingrani and Corcino. Stephenson is the best pitching prospect in the system, and Cingrani and Corcino are sufficiently close to the majors that it is a safe bet they will have big league careers (Cingrani has already started his).

After that, it's anyone's guess as to who makes it to the show- especially as far as pitchers are concerned. Lotzkar probably has the talent, but durability is a huge issue. Travieso is still at least five years away, and therefore has his own questions despite the talent. No one else seems to have slam dunk major league talent at this point that's within shooting distance. Maybe someone like Guillon or Langfield step into that category with a breakout performance this year.
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 02:56 PM   #7
Steve4192
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,073
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benihana View Post
I think the only three I'd count on at the moment having a big league impact are Stephenson, Cingrani and Corcino. Stephenson is the best pitching prospect in the system, and Cingrani and Corcino are sufficiently close to the majors that it is a safe bet the
Honestly, I wouldn't even count Stephenson. He's just too far away. Three years is a LONG time in the lifespan of a teenage pitching prospect. I certainly think he has the talent to be a fantastic major leaguer, but a lot can happen in three years. Just ask guys like Ty Howington and Chris Gruler.
Steve4192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 03:02 PM   #8
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve4192 View Post
Honestly, I wouldn't even count Stephenson. He's just too far away. Three years is a LONG time in the lifespan of a teenage pitching prospect. I certainly think he has the talent to be a fantastic major leaguer, but a lot can happen in three years. Just ask guys like Ty Howington and Chris Gruler.
Stephenson probably isn't three years away. He also isn't really comparable to a guy like Gruler, who never even had a chance by the time he was the age that Stephenson was. Howington really isn't comparable either. Same age, in Dayton, he walked 86 and struck out 119 in 141.2 innings. He took a step forward the next year, but poor control still held him back. Obviously, we can't say which direction Stephenson will go moving forward, but neither of those guys are really too comparable to him.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 03:25 PM   #9
Steve4192
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,073
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
Stephenson probably isn't three years away. He also isn't really comparable to a guy like Gruler, who never even had a chance by the time he was the age that Stephenson was. Howington really isn't comparable either. Same age, in Dayton, he walked 86 and struck out 119 in 141.2 innings. He took a step forward the next year, but poor control still held him back. Obviously, we can't say which direction Stephenson will go moving forward, but neither of those guys are really too comparable to him.
I was referring more to the fact that they got injured rather than their statistical performances.

As far as Stephenson being less than three years away, I hope you are wrong. I don't want to see the Reds rush him through the system like they did Howington. I would prefer to see him spend a full year at each stop remaining on the minor league ladder (A/A+, AA, and AAA) before arriving in the majors to stay in 2016.
Steve4192 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2013, 03:26 PM   #10
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve4192 View Post
I was referring more to the fact that they got injured rather than their statistical performances.

As far as Stephenson being less than three years away, I hope you are wrong. I don't want to see the Reds rush him through the system like they did Howington. I would prefer to see him spend a full year at each stop remaining on the minor league ladder (A/A+, AA, and AAA) before arriving in the majors to stay in 2016.
That typically doesn't happen unless he hits some struggles along the way.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 01:32 PM   #11
Benihana
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve4192 View Post
I was referring more to the fact that they got injured rather than their statistical performances.

As far as Stephenson being less than three years away, I hope you are wrong. I don't want to see the Reds rush him through the system like they did Howington. I would prefer to see him spend a full year at each stop remaining on the minor league ladder (A/A+, AA, and AAA) before arriving in the majors to stay in 2016.
I don't think a 2015 debut would be rushing Robert Stephenson, especially given the fact that several HS pitchers who were drafted in the same round as he was have already made their big league debuts (Bundy, Bauer, etc.) and others (Fernandez, et al) are playing at higher levels than Stephenson is.

If anything, the Reds have been overly conservative with Stephenson and Travieso, as there aren't many other examples of other first round HS pitchers beginning their second season in Rookie Ball.

I've said it before, but it's worth mentioning here again, that 2011 first round will go down as one of, if not the best round of pitching talent in draft history. Stephenson is an uber prospect, and he's arguably not even one of the five best pitchers taken in that round!
__________________
Go BLUE!!!
Benihana is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 04:07 PM   #12
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

What Stephenson needs right now is to start building his innings load. He totaled 65 IP last season and it's probably going to take him three full years to build up to being able to handle a major league workload. Wouldn't shock me if the Reds held him back in extended ST for April just to keep him from logging too many innings in 2013. Given the SP depth in the majors, and Cingrani and Corcino above him on the ladder, there's no reason to rush Stephenson.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2013, 04:19 PM   #13
dougdirt
The Boss
 
dougdirt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by M2 View Post
What Stephenson needs right now is to start building his innings load. He totaled 65 IP last season and it's probably going to take him three full years to build up to being able to handle a major league workload. Wouldn't shock me if the Reds held him back in extended ST for April just to keep him from logging too many innings in 2013. Given the SP depth in the majors, and Cingrani and Corcino above him on the ladder, there's no reason to rush Stephenson.
He threw 65 innings that counted in games, but he threw during extended spring training as well. The Reds know how many innings there were and how many he will be given this year, assuming health. I can't see him starting out there year anywhere but Dayton unless there is some injury. They are going to protect his innings, but I can't see it happening by just shelving him to start the season.
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com
dougdirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 10:49 AM   #14
Helms1
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Hey, thanks gentlemen.
Helms1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2013, 12:22 PM   #15
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougdirt View Post
He threw 65 innings that counted in games, but he threw during extended spring training as well. The Reds know how many innings there were and how many he will be given this year, assuming health. I can't see him starting out there year anywhere but Dayton unless there is some injury. They are going to protect his innings, but I can't see it happening by just shelving him to start the season.
It all depends on how you account for extended ST innings. I'm pretty sure teams don't count them 1:1 with live game innings.

Obviously they have an innings target. I'm kind of hoping that target is well short of the ~140 IP that he'd get in a full A-ball season. If it's <120 IP, then he's either a 4 IP starter, which I'm not sure allows him to work enough on consistency with his pitches, or he needs to keep his starts totals in the low 20s (in which case he'll need to miss some starts).

However they manage his IP cap, the main focus should be on making sure that power arm of his stays intact. In the grand scheme of his career, no one cares about his exploits in Dayton.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25