![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Memphis
Posts: 754
|
Keith Law Reds Top 10
www.espn.com/mlb/
1. Billy Hamilton, CF (30) 2. R. Stephenson, RHP (48) 3. Daniel Corcino, RHP (72) 4. Tony Cingrani, LHP (98) 5. Jesse Winker, RF 6. Nick Travieso, RHP 7. Jonathan Reynoso, CF 8. Ismael Guillon, LHP 9. Tanner Rahier, 3B 10. Daniel Langfield, RHP |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Now that's more like it. Much better than Mayo's list, anyway.
Seems like BA is not the only one so high on Reynoso.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,431
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Reynoso is getting some serious love. I'm intrigued
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,661
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Maybe they talked to the same people.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
I just have to ask this group what are the odds of the 5 pitchers listed making significant contributions to the Reds as a starter or reliever? Now to me that is the most important question to be asked about the farm system, and you guys have always impressed me with the most knowledge about the subject at hand as any group on these boards after 3 years of reading.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Quote:
After that, it's anyone's guess as to who makes it to the show- especially as far as pitchers are concerned. Lotzkar probably has the talent, but durability is a huge issue. Travieso is still at least five years away, and therefore has his own questions despite the talent. No one else seems to have slam dunk major league talent at this point that's within shooting distance. Maybe someone like Guillon or Langfield step into that category with a breakout performance this year.
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,073
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Honestly, I wouldn't even count Stephenson. He's just too far away. Three years is a LONG time in the lifespan of a teenage pitching prospect. I certainly think he has the talent to be a fantastic major leaguer, but a lot can happen in three years. Just ask guys like Ty Howington and Chris Gruler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Quote:
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,073
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Quote:
As far as Stephenson being less than three years away, I hope you are wrong. I don't want to see the Reds rush him through the system like they did Howington. I would prefer to see him spend a full year at each stop remaining on the minor league ladder (A/A+, AA, and AAA) before arriving in the majors to stay in 2016. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Quote:
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,437
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Quote:
If anything, the Reds have been overly conservative with Stephenson and Travieso, as there aren't many other examples of other first round HS pitchers beginning their second season in Rookie Ball. I've said it before, but it's worth mentioning here again, that 2011 first round will go down as one of, if not the best round of pitching talent in draft history. Stephenson is an uber prospect, and he's arguably not even one of the five best pitchers taken in that round!
__________________
Go BLUE!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
What Stephenson needs right now is to start building his innings load. He totaled 65 IP last season and it's probably going to take him three full years to build up to being able to handle a major league workload. Wouldn't shock me if the Reds held him back in extended ST for April just to keep him from logging too many innings in 2013. Given the SP depth in the majors, and Cingrani and Corcino above him on the ladder, there's no reason to rush Stephenson.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
The Boss
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 30,765
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Quote:
__________________
www.redsminorleagues.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 125
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Hey, thanks gentlemen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Posting in Dynarama
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
|
Re: Keith Law Reds Top 10
Quote:
Obviously they have an innings target. I'm kind of hoping that target is well short of the ~140 IP that he'd get in a full A-ball season. If it's <120 IP, then he's either a 4 IP starter, which I'm not sure allows him to work enough on consistency with his pitches, or he needs to keep his starts totals in the low 20s (in which case he'll need to miss some starts). However they manage his IP cap, the main focus should be on making sure that power arm of his stays intact. In the grand scheme of his career, no one cares about his exploits in Dayton.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong I'm witchcrafting everybody. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |