![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
SERP Emeritus
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,007
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
And the bengals survive.
whew
__________________
What if this wasn't a rhetorical question? All models are wrong. Some of them are useful. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
I wonder if Chris Perry would make a good #1 NFL running back.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,666
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
Quote:
I also wonder if Bratkowski could have figured out that the middle and off tackle wasn't there for Rudi in the second half. Brat is an enigma wrapped in a riddle at times with the offensive game plan. Sometimes, he looks like a genius, but then others he seems to be to slow to go away when something is not working in a given game. Or is just flat out overly conservative (Tennessee) or overly aggressive (kept going for the home run today). BTW, I think it was Bill Maas on the commentary today, and he gave some excellent analysis and kept the cheerleading either way to a minimum. A good example is when he noted that Rudi might like to run over people downhill, but might get more yardage with some cutbacks on an improv when the hole isn't there. I also liked his quick call of "heh, that looks like the Burger King guy" when the fan stole the ball from Favre. Classic.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,666
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
Oh, and the orange jersey with the orange helmet were very seasonal, as in the boys looked like The Great Pumpkins.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,666
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
And the defensive pass interference call was Reeeeeeeeeeeeediculous. That was one Maas could have saved the excuse for, the Packers receiver running through the DB is not impeding progress by the defensive player, that was a textbook example of offensive pass interference.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
GR8NESS
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lexington, Kentucky
Posts: 16,910
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
Truly amazing that a team can have 5 (!) interceptions and still have a chance to tie the game on the last play of the game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 812
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
Am I the only person who thought that this was another game in which Favre got a free pass? What other QB could throw five interceptions, have his team lose by a touchdown and not get blamed for a loss? Eliminate the INT's and the Packers win that game, yet no media member can spew anything but praise for Favre and how he's a "warrior" and a "leader" and a "competitor." Any other QB has five picks in a game and he's crucified, Favre does it and he's praised. Makes no sense to me.
__________________
"It's still a long way to the top if we want to rock'n'roll, but at least they dumped the tuba player." --M2 |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | ||
|
Joe Oliver love-child
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lexington
Posts: 4,853
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
"Booing on opening day is like telling grandma her house smells like old lady."--WOY |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
RZ Chamber of Commerce
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 13,227
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
Quote:
Favre has always been savvy about which side his bread is buttered on. He's always been open and friendly with reporters. They love him because he's quotable and he answers tough questions in a very self-effacing way. All of that relationship-building is really paying big dividends now that he's not playing at the elite level, in exactly the ways that you mentioned above. It also paid off a couple of years back when he came out publicly about his addiction to painkillers. Instead of being a negative, it just added to his aura as a guy who overcomes adversity. If he comes back next year at this level of play, IMO, that would be overplaying his hand and I think you'll finally see noticeable grumbling in the media. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: New Albany, OH
Posts: 7,200
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
Quote:
__________________
Did you like that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,666
|
Re: Anyone watching Bengals v. Packers?
The only difference between Brett Favre's performance yesterday and one that any number of former Bengals QBs like Akili Smith or David Klingler could have had was the the Packers D was incredible, well and Brat beating Rudi's head against the wall off tackle after TOs, and Palmer not letting TJ catch 15 balls yesterday underneath. If the outcome had been like the Vikings game earlier, I don't think the "amazement" would have been quite so evident. In other words, the consequences of the TOs had nothing to do with Favre, yet he is somehow credited with the outcome.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |