RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern > Fantasy Island

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-28-2005, 10:34 PM   #1
BuckeyeRedleg
Will post for food
 
BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

I'm in a league where you can only keep one player from the previous year, but it has to be someone you drafted between rounds 10-20.

My top choices:

Tatum Bell
Nate Burleson

I was all set on Bell, now with anderson being named the starter, I'm not so sure. The league is somewhere between a 25/75 and 50/50 (TD/YDS) scoring format.

Thanks for any advice.
BuckeyeRedleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 08-29-2005, 08:53 AM   #2
TheBurn
Do it!
 
TheBurn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Rincon, PR-Winter Pk, FL
Posts: 1,820
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

Burleson... for this year at least.
TheBurn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2005, 01:04 PM   #3
BuckU
Not Laughing
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 661
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

Burleson, Mike Anderson is getting the starting nod on Denver...
__________________
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.
~Oscar Wilde
BuckU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-29-2005, 06:06 PM   #4
captainmorgan07
got alil captain in u?
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Bridgeport Ohio
Posts: 4,839
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

burleson he'll be the go to man with moss gone
captainmorgan07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 12:05 AM   #5
kheidg-
Member
 
kheidg-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,678
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

Definitely Burleson
kheidg- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 04:08 PM   #6
Jeremy Piergallini
Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Shadyside, Ohio
Posts: 179
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

Tatum Bell. Just because I wanted to be different.

But really, Burleson has the potential, but don't rule out the fact that Williamson and Wiggins are there.

With Bell, anderson may be the starter, but Bell will see action.

At this point, go with Burleson.
__________________
Madness is like gravity....all it needs is a little push.

Why so serious?
Jeremy Piergallini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2005, 07:26 PM   #7
BuckeyeRedleg
Will post for food
 
BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

Does anyone think Culpepper (without Moss) could be somewhat of a bust this year?

I ask, because I have the 8th pick (10 team league) and I'm pretty sure I already know who will go 1-6.

1. Tomlinson
2. Manning
3. Alexander
4. Holmes
5. McGahee or James
6. McGahee or James
7.
8.

I'm thinking I could take Culpepper, Moss, or a RB at #8. If I take DC, I'd have him with Burleson and I could always take a RB at pick #13 (Dillon, Lewis, D.Davis, etc.).

Question. Does anyone think it's crazy to take DC?

What about Moss?

And if I take a RB there, who do you take?

I want Stephen Jackson, but #13 may be a little bit of a reach and I know for sure a back like that won't be around in round three for me at #28.

I think it's real important for me to get RB's at #8 and #13, but DC and Moss may be too tempting at #8.

Thoughts?





Oh yes, one more thing. Does anyone other than me feel a bit guilty that I'm concerned over this (fantasy football) with all that is going on down in NO?
BuckeyeRedleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2005, 01:01 AM   #8
Cedric
Member
 
Cedric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Monroe
Posts: 6,218
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

Quote:
Originally Posted by BuckeyeRedleg
Does anyone think Culpepper (without Moss) could be somewhat of a bust this year?

I ask, because I have the 8th pick (10 team league) and I'm pretty sure I already know who will go 1-6.

1. Tomlinson
2. Manning
3. Alexander
4. Holmes
5. McGahee or James
6. McGahee or James
7.
8.

I'm thinking I could take Culpepper, Moss, or a RB at #8. If I take DC, I'd have him with Burleson and I could always take a RB at pick #13 (Dillon, Lewis, D.Davis, etc.).

Question. Does anyone think it's crazy to take DC?

What about Moss?

And if I take a RB there, who do you take?

I want Stephen Jackson, but #13 may be a little bit of a reach and I know for sure a back like that won't be around in round three for me at #28.

I think it's real important for me to get RB's at #8 and #13, but DC and Moss may be too tempting at #8.

Thoughts?





Oh yes, one more thing. Does anyone other than me feel a bit guilty that I'm concerned over this (fantasy football) with all that is going on down in NO?
I was in a fantasy league and someone did just that. Drafted Culpepper and Moss instead of Portis and someone else. I say get the two running backs and hope that Culpepper doesn't blow up again.



Life goes on. I have total sympathy for people all over the world that are poor and have no food daily. It hurts that these people are from the states, but the world is full of pitiful things daily.
__________________
This is the time. The real Reds organization is back.
Cedric is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2005, 10:03 PM   #9
BuckeyeRedleg
Will post for food
 
BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

Just wrapped mine up. Cedric, had to go with Culpepper. My gut just told me to take him over Moss. The top 6 went just how I thought though. J. Lewis went #7.

20 round draft.

Keeper: Nate Burleson

1. Daunte Culpepper QB (#8)
2. Domanick Davis RB (#13)
3. Reggie Wayne WR (#28)
4. Brian Westbrook RB (#33)
5. Drew Bennett (#48)
6. Baltimore Ravens DEF (#53)
7. Warrick Dunn RB
8. Larry Johnson RB
9. Michael Bennett RB
10. Deion Branch WR
11. T.J. Duckett RB
12. Mewelde Moore RB
13. Ryan Moats RB
14. David Givens WR
15. Travis Taylor WR
16. Brian Griese QB
17 Kevin Curtis WR
18. Matt Stover K
19 Verand Morency RB
20. David Patten WR

It was hard for me to take D.Davis over Stephen Jackson at #13. I just didn't want to overdraft Jackson, but I feel like I really let one slip by there. I took one kicker and one defense realizing I'll have to pick one up of each in week three when Stover and Balt D have a bye. I'll probably drop two of Givens, Patten, and T.Taylor. I just wanted to see what these three could do the first few weeks of the season and I'm taking advantage the fact that pickups (for some reason) are free.
BuckeyeRedleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2005, 12:57 PM   #10
BuckeyeRedleg
Will post for food
 
BuckeyeRedleg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Dublin, OH
Posts: 5,088
Re: FFball ? Protect TATUM BELL or NATE BURLESON?

Well, as you see from my draft night roster, my team ended up pretty weak. However, due to Larry Johnson, I snuck into the playoffs last week and Baltimore's D in the last 17 seconds of MNF helped me cheese out a semi-final win.

I now will go for the title.

Thank goodness for Larry Johnson.

By the way, I have gotten this far with a QB platoon of Brad Johnson and Chris Simms. Smoke and mirrors.
BuckeyeRedleg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25