![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: princeton, nj
Posts: 9,482
|
second law of Cincy-dynamics
with every smart Bengals move, the Reds do something dumber
now that the Bengals used up dead cap space on a CPalmer extension, I'm expecting something incredibly bad, soon like a DanO extension bad |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,349
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Or the Reds will also offer Palmer an extension
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
First Time Caller
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,238
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
No WAY. He strikes out too much and can't hit the sac fly.
__________________
Dusty Baker, second shooter. --Confirmed on Redszone. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 3,918
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
I doubt it will be a DanO extension, but I could see the new ownership group finally being approved and they leave Obie in place for the final season of his contract.
Another wasted year, just what we need! g0 r3dZ!1!!
__________________
Pessimists are well informed optimists |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Quote:
FWIW, Palmer is the most overrated QB since..........well Boomer. He simply isn't that good. Get pressure on him and he melts. The Bengals have one of the worst D's in the game and are a weakening OL away from a much worse offense. Does Cincinnati love flukes that much? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
This one's for you Edd
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dayton Area
Posts: 8,471
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Quote:
IMO - It's the quiet before the storm. BUT - it's going to be too late for 2006.
__________________
Some people play baseball. Baseball plays Jay Bruce. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Just The Big Picture
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Quote:
__________________
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,743
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Quote:
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Quote:
Palmer likewise, is playing behind a OL that has improved from last year and to no surprise, have Palmer's stats. But can that OL play as well next year and into the future without a defense? If the Bengals defense doesn't get better, things will go downhill and in a hurry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Please come again
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Just b/c Boomer was overrated doesn't mean Carson Palmer is. Palmer has already surpassed anything Boomer ever did statistics wise(over a single season) and he is only in his second season.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Santa Paula, CA
Posts: 6,536
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Quote:
This defense you say is awful and won't get better his very young. Its leading safety has been out since week 3. Its other safety has missed pretty much the whole year. Its future rushing LB missed half the season and several other key players have missed huge amounts of time. Don't forget that Lewis a a DEFENSIVE specialist and this defense will be a top rated one in ayear or two. As to Palmer and Boomer.....yeah, right. Not sure you watch much football. If not for Jerry Rice and a first quater broken leg by their top defensive player, the Boomer led Bengals likely would have beaten Joe Montana.
__________________
"Is there a problem officers?" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 4,266
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Quote:
Dang it. I promised myself I'd never mention that again.
__________________
4009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,196
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Have you been WATCHING? I don't see how anyone who's actually watched Palmer play this year could say these types of things.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
"Let's Roll"
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 12,828
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Me either, MWM. His numbers are right up there with Brady and Manning. And he runs too!
And, for what it's worth, every good QB needs a good OL... without it, you'd never know if he's good or not because no QB, even a good one, can pass if he's on the ground every other play. A good OL allows a good QB to show just how good he is.
__________________
"Enjoy this Reds fans, you are watching a legend grow up before your very eyes" ... DoogMinAmo on Adam Dunn |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Potential Lunch Winner
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,666
|
Re: second law of Cincy-dynamics
Quote:
If you think Carson Palmer is overrated, you need to wipe your eyes with that ugly yellow towel you probably sleep with. I'll probably get murdered for saying this, but Joe Montana is probably the most overrated QB of all time. Put him on any other team and they don't win anything. Put him on the those late 80s Broncos teams and Cleveland plays in a few Super Bowls. How many titles would Elway have had playing for the Niners?
__________________
If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg Last edited by Dom Heffner; 12-29-2005 at 08:33 PM. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |