RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Miscellaneous > The Tavern

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-22-2006, 06:24 PM   #1
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Super Bowl XL (Steelers- Seahawks): Lamest Super Bowl in Years

With apologies to Steel who will no doubt disagree with me in a big way, this year's Super Bowl is going to feature the weakest matchup since the Ravens-Giants, and if not for that game, would be the lamest matchup in the last 20 years. Neither team from the NFC is all that great and this year's Steelers is the one of the weakest teams to represent the AFC for quite some time, in my humble opinion. I'm not sure it's even worth watching.

I'm not suggesting they're not deserving, because they are by nature of their playoff wins.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David

Last edited by MWM; 01-22-2006 at 06:44 PM.
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 01-22-2006, 06:28 PM   #2
savafan
Maple SERP
 
savafan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

I want to agree with you MWM, I really do, but all of those blowouts I remember watching as a kid made for some pretty lame Super Bowls. It is also hard for me to say that the Steelers don't deserve to go after they beat the Bengals, Colts and Broncos.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos.

If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't.
savafan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 06:45 PM   #3
deltachi8
smells of rich mahogany
 
deltachi8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,001
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

No one is forcing anyone to watch. Im sure there will be a movie of the week marathon on O or something....
__________________
Nothing to see here. Please disperse.
deltachi8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 06:45 PM   #4
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

It's not a matter of deserving. Any team that wins their way to the game deserves to be there. That doesn't mean they're great teams and in my opinion, this year's matchup is going to be a stinker.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 06:51 PM   #5
deltachi8
smells of rich mahogany
 
deltachi8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,001
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

Well, because its John Madden at the mic and its in a cold city, I will agree those parts stinks...
__________________
Nothing to see here. Please disperse.
deltachi8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 06:59 PM   #6
pedro
Please come again
 
pedro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: portland, oregon
Posts: 14,716
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

The Super Bowl is the most overhyped event in the world. Seldom is the game even moderately exciting IMO.
__________________
Get your nunchucks and the keys to your dad's car. I know where we can get a gun
pedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 07:14 PM   #7
WVRed
C-A-T-S CATS! CATS! CATS!
 
WVRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Almost Heaven
Posts: 8,421
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM
With apologies to Steel who will no doubt disagree with me in a big way, this year's Super Bowl is going to feature the weakest matchup since the Ravens-Giants, and if not for that game, would be the lamest matchup in the last 20 years. Neither team from the NFC is all that great and this year's Steelers is the one of the weakest teams to represent the AFC for quite some time, in my humble opinion. I'm not sure it's even worth watching.

I'm not suggesting they're not deserving, because they are by nature of their playoff wins.
I'm sure the NFL front office agrees with you, since many in Pittsburgh would contend that the refs and the media did everything possible to keep it from happening.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by savafan View Post
I've read books about sparkling vampires who walk around in the daylight that were written better than a John Fay article.
WVRed is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 07:29 PM   #8
Chip R
Rally Onion!
 
Chip R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 33,214
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM
With apologies to Steel who will no doubt disagree with me in a big way, this year's Super Bowl is going to feature the weakest matchup since the Ravens-Giants, and if not for that game, would be the lamest matchup in the last 20 years. Neither team from the NFC is all that great and this year's Steelers is the one of the weakest teams to represent the AFC for quite some time, in my humble opinion. I'm not sure it's even worth watching.

I'm not suggesting they're not deserving, because they are by nature of their playoff wins.
While I'm sure most people on here would have loved to have seen the Bengals in the SB, they certainly wouldn't have been a good representative either. Maybe Indy was the best team out of that bunch for matchup purposes and the Dungy storyline but that might have been it out of the AFC. Face it, there is no great team out there. That's one reason why a team like PIT got to the SB winning out on the road in 3 places you really don't want to play as a visiting team.
__________________
The Rally Onion wants 150 fans before Opening Day.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Rally-...24872650873160
Chip R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 07:39 PM   #9
M2
Posting in Dynarama
 
M2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boston
Posts: 26,668
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

Admittedly I don't pay much attention to these things (and I totally agree with Pedro's comments), but I get the distinct impression the NFC is the sacrificial lamb these days. The Steelers, after years of near misses, just waded through the top three teams in the AFC on the road. It looks like this year they finally climb back on top of the heap.

I'm guessing the game would profile as more exciting if it could be played in the snow in front of maniac fans instead of an indoor/warm weather site in front of corporate executives. Then the Steelers' smashmouth charms would be more appealing.
__________________
Baseball isn't a magic trick ... it doesn't get spoiled if you figure out how it works. - gonelong

I'm witchcrafting everybody.
M2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 07:39 PM   #10
Falls City Beer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

All I can say to the Steelers: good bleepin' luck against Seattle. You're gonna need it.
Falls City Beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 08:00 PM   #11
GAC
What Me Worry?
 
GAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,416
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by Falls City Beer
All I can say to the Steelers: good bleepin' luck against Seattle. You're gonna need it.
Didn't you say the same against the Bengals and then Indy.

I give the Steelers credit. They didn't just beat the top three seeds in the AFC - they annihilated them IMO. They have come prepared and were well coached. And people can knock Big Ben all they want, but this guy has had an excellent post-season and is the MVP so far in my book.

I'll still hang with Pitt to win the Super Bowl.
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations
GAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 08:02 PM   #12
Falls City Beer
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 24,098
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by GAC
You said that against the Bengals and then Indy.

I give the Steelers credit. They didn't just beat the top three seeds in the AFC - they annihilated them IMO. They have come prepared and were well coached. And people can knock Big Ben all they want, but this guy has had an excellent post-season and is the MVP so far in my book.

I'll still hang with Pitt to win the Super Bowl.
Not against Indy I didn't. And from the word go I thought the Bengals/Steelers were an even money matchup.
Falls City Beer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 08:06 PM   #13
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

I don't think the Bengals would have been a better representative. It's just hard for me to get excited about the Seahawks-Steelers. I just don't think either team is anything special. Of course, the AFC didn't have asingle team this year that was anything special.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 08:21 PM   #14
GAC
What Me Worry?
 
GAC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,416
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

Quote:
Originally Posted by MWM
I don't think the Bengals would have been a better representative. It's just hard for me to get excited about the Seahawks-Steelers. I just don't think either team is anything special. Of course, the AFC didn't have asingle team this year that was anything special.
Indy wasn't? I'll admit that I thought they were over-rated, even when everyone was on the Indy/Peyton Manning bandwagon.

I just think there is so much parity in the NFL anymore. But I am thoroughly impressed with the Steeler's play in the second half of the season and in this post-season. The last couple of years expectations were high for the Steelers. This year they were the underdogs, and I think that helped them.
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations
GAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2006, 08:25 PM   #15
MWM
Pre-tty, pre-tty good!!
 
MWM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 12,171
Re: Lamest Super Bowl in Years

I don't think Indy was over-rated. I just think they played a bad game and really paid the price for being rusty. I'm not sure what happened to Denver, but they didn't show up today either. You got to give credit to the Steelers for taking advantage, but I still think both of those teams beat Pittsburgh most of the time. Maybe I just don't appreciate their style of play, but I don't think they're one of the weaker teams in the Super Bowl we've seen in a while. Of course, I wouldn't admit it, but the same could be said had the Bengals made it.
__________________
Grape works as a soda. Sort of as a gum. I wonder why it doesn't work as a pie. Grape pie? There's no grape pie. - Larry David
MWM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25