![]() |
|
|
#151 | |
|
Potential Lunch Winner
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 5,666
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
I was sitting in a room in Tampa Florida where nobody cared about this game, and all they kept talking about was how bad the officiating was. That hold, regardless of when the flag was thrown was a joke. If that's holding, then everybody holds on every play. Even Madden said something, IIRC. I mean, we read post after post from SteelSD talking about how bad the refs were in the Colts game, and all he can muster up here is that Hasselbeck put himself in that position by throwing a bad pass and a prior holding call made a second, lousy call legitimate. This is absolutely amazing to me.
__________________
If you're watchin' a parade, make sure you stand in one spot, don't follow it, it never changes. And if the parade is boring, run in the opposite direction, you will fast-foward the parade. --Mitch Hedberg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#152 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,025
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
Don't do that again.
__________________
"The problem with strikeouts isn't that they hurt your team, it's that they hurt your feelings..." --Rob Neyer "The single most important thing for a hitter is to get a good pitch to hit. A good hitter can hit a pitch that’s over the plate three times better than a great hitter with a ball in a tough spot.” --Ted Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 | |
|
Just The Big Picture
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
__________________
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy. Last edited by macro; 02-07-2006 at 02:49 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#154 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#155 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,025
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
But don't fret. Just remember- there's always next year. And I'll be rooting for the Bengals to win every single one of their preseason games.
__________________
"The problem with strikeouts isn't that they hurt your team, it's that they hurt your feelings..." --Rob Neyer "The single most important thing for a hitter is to get a good pitch to hit. A good hitter can hit a pitch that’s over the plate three times better than a great hitter with a ball in a tough spot.” --Ted Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#156 |
|
Just The Big Picture
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: The Bluegrass State
Posts: 6,150
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
I listened to three different AM stations today in the car, albeit that one was ESPN Radio (others were Louisville and Nashville local broadcasts), and I heard no opinions that differ from those sava cited. It's not just sava, it's not just the ESPN boards, and it's not just Bengals fans. From what I can tell, every subjective source feels the same way. But I guess all those people are just wrong. They all just hate the Steelers.
__________________
Help stamp out, eliminate, and do away with redundancy. |
|
|
|
|
|
#157 | |
|
Titanic Struggles
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The 513
Posts: 12,134
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
The officiating in the game was poor -- hell, the officiating in the playoffs in general has been poor -- but officiating/umpiring/judging could always be better in sports. It's going to continue to BE poor until the NFL sets up more stringent paramaters on what constitutes various infractions, especially on the judgment calls such as holding and pass interferene, or puts more officials on the field to ensure that at least one official at all times has a clear view of the play. At least in this go around, there were no suspicious rules pulled seemingly out of the air a la Polamalu's "The INT that is not an INT" a couple weeks back or Brady's infamous tuck rule against Oakland. In general, whining over officiating is crap. I'm an on-again-off-again member of the official Buccaneers BBS (about as quality as Reds.com), and the whining over there was absolutely unbearable following the playoff loss to Washington and Edell Shephard's dropped pass. Bucs fans can whine all they want about possession rules and catches, but it obscures the real issues, like poor offensive line blocking that led to two INTs on Simms and poor ball control that led to a fumble by Cadillac Williams. The bottom line is, teams determine outcomes of games by making plays. Seattle, even accounting for officiating, didn't make as many plays as Pittsburgh and they lost the Super Bowl because of it. There's nothing "tainted" about Pittsburgh's win -- they finished the game with more points than their opposition. Seattle had chances to score points that it left on the field with poor special teams play, poor clock management, and poor playcalling. Make a play. The pity in all of this is that it is obscuring what should be a great moment for a great coach and human being in Bill Cowher, and giving a free pass to Mike Holmgren, who was (once again) outcoached in the Big Game. It's beyond moronic that they didn't run Shaun Alexander more than they did, and their clock management, as stated, was horrendous to end the 1st half. Last I checked, the officials didn't tell Hasselbeck to stand at the line for 20 seconds gesturing like he was suffering from some sort of psychosis while having a spare timeout and the clock ticking down.
__________________
Championships Matter. 22 Years and Counting... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,651
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
The supporters of the offensive PI are wayyyyyyyyyyy overstating the contact. I don't even think that would be a foul in basketball.
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
|
#159 | |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#160 | |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#161 |
|
What Me Worry?
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bellefontaine, Ohio
Posts: 26,416
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
I still say that any team/coach that doesn't realize it's a gadget play when the QB hands off to Randle-El, and allows them to perfectly execute the play for a TD, deserves to lose. I mean - C'mon!
![]() And to say that EVERY call went Pitt's way is simply playing fast and loose with the truth IMO. I'm no fan of Pittsburgh either.... but I find this thread funny (and sad). ![]() They were 7-5 at one point, and things were looking pretty dim for them. They run off 8 straight wins.. and 3 of them were away games during the post-season against teams that everyone predicted they would get their butts kicked. Your predictions (or hopes) didnt come true. Pittsburgh was just as much a victim of bad officiating as the rest (see Indy game) - give it a rest already.
__________________
"panic" only comes from having real expectations Last edited by GAC; 02-07-2006 at 08:53 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#162 | |
|
Maple SERP
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 17,485
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
Agreed, that was idiotic.
__________________
This is the Cal Ripkin Jr. of typos. If you ask me to join your fantasy baseball league and I select Legolas in the first round, don't be angry at me. It's not my fault I've read up on the players and you haven't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#163 | |
|
smells of rich mahogany
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,001
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
::smiles politely::
__________________
Nothing to see here. Please disperse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: New Jersey, USA
Posts: 5,410
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
I realized this morning that the last three Sports Illustrated issues all featured the Steelers on the front cover:
Jan. 16 (Bettis) Jan. 23 (Big Ben) Jan. 30 (Bettis) And obviously the next issue will feature the Steelers, too. (They can't put Bettis on again, can they?) I wonder if any team has ever appeared on 4 consecutive issues of SI before? I assume Michael Jordan has pulled off what Bettis did (twice in three weeks.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#165 | |
|
Unsolicited Opinions
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Right Down Broadway
Posts: 17,651
|
Re: Here We Go Steelers
Quote:
__________________
Can't win with 'em Can't win without 'em |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |