RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion  

Go Back   RedsZone.com - Cincinnati Reds Fans' Home for Baseball Discussion > Baseball > The Sun Deck

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-09-2006, 06:02 PM   #16
registerthis
Harry Chiti Fan
 
registerthis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsrbetter
retard afterwards is speaking of the Reds as if they do not score runs. They "lean on the big boppers." "They sit back and hit home runs." Idiot, doesn't think the Reds score any runs!
He obviously meant to dial the banana phone and mistakenly called the wrong number.
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it.
registerthis is offline   Reply With Quote
Turn Off Ads?
Old 02-09-2006, 06:03 PM   #17
wheels
Dented and Spent
 
wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,539
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Wow.

Krivsky gave a decent interview, but that commentary by the Canadian guy was awful.

The gist of it was that the Reds don't manufacture runs and don't score as many runs as the BRM.

Then he went on to suggest that the Reds trade offensive players (that don't score enough runs) for two or three great young players.

He called himself a numbers cruncher at one point.
__________________
"Opening Day.... Pfffft! We get all excited, thinking they're gonna have some kinda great year....Same thing over and over. Disappointment. What time do you want me to come over?" - My Dad. Opening Day 2012.
wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 06:15 PM   #18
vaticanplum
Has big taste
 
vaticanplum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 6,704
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by redsrbetter
retard afterwards is speaking of the Reds as if they do not score runs. They "lean on the big boppers." "They sit back and hit home runs."
Good thing they brought in Womack to up the scrappy factor.
__________________
There is no such thing as a pitching prospect.
vaticanplum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 06:20 PM   #19
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,401
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheels
Wow.

Krivsky gave a decent interview, but that commentary by the Canadian guy was awful.

The gist of it was that the Reds don't manufacture runs and don't score as many runs as the BRM.

Then he went on to suggest that the Reds trade offensive players (that don't score enough runs) for two or three great young players.

He called himself a numbers cruncher at one point.
So since the Reds don't match up one of the best offenses in the history of the game they don't have one?

Ok.....

Code:
Since 2000 in the NL vs the league

RUNS                          YEAR     DIFF   PLAYER   LEAGUE   
T1   Braves                   2003      130      907      777   
T1   Rockies                  2001      130      923      793   
3    Rockies                  2000      119      968      849   
4    Astros                   2000       86      938      852   
T5   Cardinals                2003       84      876      792   
T5   Giants                   2000       84      925      841   
7    Rockies                  2003       77      853      776   
8    Cardinals                2004       73      855      782   
9    Diamondbacks             2002       69      819      750   
10   Reds                     2005       64      820      756   



Best against the league in team history 

RUNS                          YEAR     DIFF   PLAYER   LEAGUE   
1    Reds                     1976      178      857      679   
2    Reds                     1975      147      840      693   
3    Reds                     1965      138      825      687   
4    Reds                     1969      102      798      696   
5    Reds                     1968       93      690      597   
6    Reds                     1956       83      775      692   
7    Reds                     1974       75      776      701   
8    Reds                     1903       74      764      690   
9    Reds                     1972       73      707      634   
10   Reds                     1905       68      736      668   
11   Reds                     1977       67      802      735   
12   Reds                     1918       65      538      473   
13   Reds                     2005       64      820      756 

Best all time in the NL

RUNS                          YEAR     DIFF   PLAYER   LEAGUE   
1    Pirates                  1902      193      775      582   
2    Dodgers                  1953      189      955      766   
3    Reds                     1976      178      857      679   
4    Rockies                  1996      177      961      784   
5    Rockies                  1997      149      923      774   
6    Reds                     1975      147      840      693   
7    Reds                     1965      138      825      687   
8    Dodgers                  1955      136      857      721   
9    Giants                   1905      135      780      645   
10   Giants                   1924      133      857      724
westofyou is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 06:31 PM   #20
wheels
Dented and Spent
 
wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,539
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Yeah, he said the main reason they don't score more runs is that they don't sacrifice themselves for the team, move runners, make contact. The 05 Reds team also struck out twice as much as the BRM.

I swear it was BF.
__________________
"Opening Day.... Pfffft! We get all excited, thinking they're gonna have some kinda great year....Same thing over and over. Disappointment. What time do you want me to come over?" - My Dad. Opening Day 2012.
wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 06:42 PM   #21
westofyou
breath
 
westofyou's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: PDX
Posts: 39,401
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheels
The 05 Reds team also struck out twice as much as the BRM.
Raw number mistake.

vs the league average

Code:
STRIKEOUTS                    YEAR     DIFF   PLAYER   LEAGUE   
1    Reds                     2003      297     1326     1029   
2    Reds                     2004      296     1335     1039   
3    Reds                     2005      292     1303     1011   
4    Reds                     1974      180      940      760   
5    Reds                     1975      178      916      738   
6    Reds                     1983      175     1006      831   
7    Reds                     1976      161      902      741   
8    Reds                     1969      156     1042      886   
9    Reds                     2002      150     1188     1038   
10   Reds                     1979      147      902      755
westofyou is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 07:03 PM   #22
Nugget
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NorthEast
Posts: 1,002
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

I can kind of see the point that the guy is trying to make. The REDS have some big boppers but last year there was some poor situational hitting. There were also a number of games last yaer where the REDS had huge innings when the game was already won bu couldn't get the offense going in a close game. The REDS do have a lot of all or nothing kind of batters. Home Runs are great for the fans and resume but sometimes just sacrificing and moving a guy over, taking a walk can do so much more the for the team winning. I can remember at least three games last year where the REDS had base loaded situations, no outs and didn't get any runs. Most of them are guilty of it.
Nugget is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 07:09 PM   #23
roby
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,154
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

vaticanplum: I think you might have misspelled "crappy" in your last post?!?
roby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 07:35 PM   #24
wheels
Dented and Spent
 
wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,539
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget
I can kind of see the point that the guy is trying to make. The REDS have some big boppers but last year there was some poor situational hitting. There were also a number of games last yaer where the REDS had huge innings when the game was already won bu couldn't get the offense going in a close game. The REDS do have a lot of all or nothing kind of batters. Home Runs are great for the fans and resume but sometimes just sacrificing and moving a guy over, taking a walk can do so much more the for the team winning. I can remember at least three games last year where the REDS had base loaded situations, no outs and didn't get any runs. Most of them are guilty of it.
Getting nothing out of bases loaded scenarios happens to every team.

The Reds scored 820 runs last year. The most in the National League.
__________________
"Opening Day.... Pfffft! We get all excited, thinking they're gonna have some kinda great year....Same thing over and over. Disappointment. What time do you want me to come over?" - My Dad. Opening Day 2012.
wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 08:08 PM   #25
Puffy
Puffy 3:16
 
Puffy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Panama City Beach
Posts: 13,669
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget
There were also a number of games last yaer where the REDS had huge innings when the game was already won but couldn't get the offense going in a close game.
With the Reds pitching the last couple of years no games were ever "won" before they were over. In other words, the Reds pitchers cause every run to be meaningful.
__________________
"I came here to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of bubble gum."
- - Rowdy Roddy Piper

"It takes a big man to admit when he is wrong. I am not a big man"
- - Fletch
Puffy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2006, 09:09 PM   #26
NewEraReds
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Kettering
Posts: 530
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

i kinda agree with the guys. its not how many you score over the course of an entire season, but when you score them. if you score 10 when you only need 4 to win, but score 3 when you need 6 to win. then you total runs scored doesnt mean much
NewEraReds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 12:02 AM   #27
BrooklynRedz
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 767
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Anyone catch the name of the genius on after Krivsky?
BrooklynRedz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 12:56 AM   #28
SteelSD
Member
 
SteelSD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,025
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nugget
I can kind of see the point that the guy is trying to make. The REDS have some big boppers but last year there was some poor situational hitting. There were also a number of games last yaer where the REDS had huge innings when the game was already won bu couldn't get the offense going in a close game. The REDS do have a lot of all or nothing kind of batters. Home Runs are great for the fans and resume but sometimes just sacrificing and moving a guy over, taking a walk can do so much more the for the team winning. I can remember at least three games last year where the REDS had base loaded situations, no outs and didn't get any runs. Most of them are guilty of it.
2005 Cincinnati Reds Bases Loaded:

.303 BA, .366 OBP, .539 SLG- .906 OPS

151 Runs Scored

The Reds were 2nd in the NL in OPS with the Bases Loaded and only the Phillies scored more Runs with the Bases Loaded than did the Reds- primarily because the Phillies ended up with 50 more Bases Loaded Plate Appearances than did the Reds.

Believe it or not, the Cincinnati Reds were the best situational hitting team in the National League overall in 2005. There was absolutely NOTHING wrong with that offense.
__________________
"The problem with strikeouts isn't that they hurt your team, it's that they hurt your feelings..." --Rob Neyer

"The single most important thing for a hitter is to get a good pitch to hit. A good hitter can hit a pitch that’s over the plate three times better than a great hitter with a ball in a tough spot.”
--Ted Williams
SteelSD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 01:24 AM   #29
wheels
Dented and Spent
 
wheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 6,539
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelSD
2005 Cincinnati Reds Bases Loaded:

.303 BA, .366 OBP, .539 SLG- .906 OPS

151 Runs Scored

The Reds were 2nd in the NL in OPS with the Bases Loaded and only the Phillies scored more Runs with the Bases Loaded than did the Reds- primarily because the Phillies ended up with 50 more Bases Loaded Plate Appearances than did the Reds.

Believe it or not, the Cincinnati Reds were the best situational hitting team in the National League overall in 2005. There was absolutely NOTHING wrong with that offense.
Not one single thing.

This garbage we keep being fed by the media shows me nothing more than an overall dearth of pitching knowledge.

They can't seem to figure out what actually makes a pitcher good, so they gloss over it by talking about "Manufacturing Runs" and how if they just would have scored that one run on Aug. 19, the Reds would somehow solve their pitching problems.

Gimme a dadgum break...It's all nonsense.
__________________
"Opening Day.... Pfffft! We get all excited, thinking they're gonna have some kinda great year....Same thing over and over. Disappointment. What time do you want me to come over?" - My Dad. Opening Day 2012.
wheels is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2006, 01:27 AM   #30
Aronchis
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,673
Re: Krivsky Guest Today on "Staying Hot"

Quote:
Originally Posted by wheels
Not one single thing.

This garbage we keep being fed by the media shows me nothing more than an overall dearth of pitching knowledge.

They can't seem to figure out what actually makes a pitcher good, so they gloss over it by talking about "Manufacturing Runs" and how if they just would have scored that one run on Aug. 19, the Reds would somehow solve their pitching problems.

Gimme a dadgum break...It's all nonsense.
They hit well, fielded like crap, that is what the media should be spouting. That is the square hole in the round peg treatment. Either the Reds buy a staff that can strike people out or break this team up for a better defending team while your rebuild.
Aronchis is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please.

Thank you, and most importantly, enjoy yourselves!

RedsZone.com is a privately owned website and is not affiliated with the Cincinnati Reds or Major League Baseball

Contact us: Boss | GIK | dabvu2498 | GADawg | Gallen5862 | LexRedsFan | mattfeet | MBZags | Plus Plus | redsfan1995 | The Operator | Tommyjohn25