|
02-09-2006, 06:17 PM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elida
Posts: 90
|
Westbrook v Weaver
I was chatting with a Cleveland fan today and he said that the Westbrook deal is still alive! It is very dependent on the Indians signing Weaver. He does not think that Weaver will come to Cleveland but is using them to get more money out west. Has anyone else heard this. I still would not want to trade Kearns for Westbrook. I would do Willy Mo and a prospect.
__________________
Reds fan forever! |
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:03 PM
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 158
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
Same was said about Millwood last year and he ended up in the "armpit of North America."
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 08:43 PM
|
#3 |
|
Basement-Dwelling Blogger
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 144
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
With Krivsky back in the fold, I imagine a lot of deals are back on the table. But I'd be very reluctant to trade Kearns now given what he could potentially bring if he gets hot early in the year. 'Course, if he does what he did last year, it's probably a lost cause.
Wily Mo I'm more comfortable moving, though I will say that they are both pretty cheap parts with big upsides. I'd be much happier trading Griffey, though I doubt he could bring a Westbrook in return, unfortunately. -JinAZ |
|
|
|
|
02-09-2006, 11:59 PM
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,124
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
Keep AK and WMP....Release Womack, and sign some 200 inning guys still left and hopefully something comes afloat....Barry Zito will be available early in the year rather than at the July 31st Trading Deadline....
I would rather the Reds find their Strengths with the players they have than lose one and he goes Carlos Lee on us.... JaredRoberts.com |
|
|
|
|
02-10-2006, 07:08 AM
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8,380
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
Funny, I would not trade Wily Mo for Westbrook, but I would trade Kearns for Westbrook.
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2006, 09:35 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Harry Chiti Fan
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 5,872
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
Quote:
__________________
We'll burn that bridge when we get to it. |
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2006, 09:48 AM
|
#7 | |
|
The Lineups stink.
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: West N. Carolina
Posts: 55,343
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
Quote:
Pena has tremendous power, but doesn't seem to have much of anything else.
__________________
Go Gators! |
|
|
|
|
|
02-10-2006, 10:12 AM
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Elida
Posts: 90
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
I would prefer to trade WMP just because I think Kearns will be a better all around offensive player and will provide much better defense. Westbrook is an innings eater and a ground ball pitcher, not a number 1 but better than most of what we have.
__________________
Reds fan forever! |
|
|
|
|
02-11-2006, 12:51 PM
|
#9 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Weatherford, Texas
Posts: 2,124
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
Quote:
Beane usually likes to trade his players so he has "incoming" players for more than the last 2 months of the season... Oh, and Zito will be available...I don't have any FIRM info... But Barry Zito has been on record, even on the Howard Stern show and saying how he wanted to play in New York when he becomes a Free-Agent... I know, I know...why trade for a guy headed for the Yankees??? Cause the Reds clubhouse will win him over and Krivisky hopefully will get a 72 hour window to negotiate a LTC... Anyway, Hudson and Mulder would feel left out if they were the only 2 of the A's Big 3 to get traded to the National League... JaredRoberts.com |
|
|
|
|
|
02-11-2006, 04:04 PM
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 187
|
Re: Westbrook v Weaver
I would not trade for Westbrook period. He is not the answer.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|
Board Moderators may, at their discretion and judgment, delete and/or edit any messages that violate any of the following guidelines: 1. Explicit references to alleged illegal or unlawful acts. 2. Graphic sexual descriptions. 3. Racial or ethnic slurs. 4. Use of edgy language (including masked profanity). 5. Direct personal attacks, flames, fights, trolling, baiting, name-calling, general nuisance, excessive player criticism or anything along those lines. 6. Posting spam. 7. Each person may have only one user account. It is fine to be critical here - that's what this board is for. But let's not beat a subject or a player to death, please. |
Linear Mode
